长期以来，股权质押以其资金变现的高效性与成本的经济性，成为上市公司股东们所偏好的一种融资方式。在此背景下，上市公司实际控制人在股权质押粉饰财务报表的事件在资本市场上频繁发生。本文在已有研究的基础上，运用案例分析法研究了实际控制人股权质押财务舞弊的成因及方式，进而提出防范股权质押财务舞弊发生的建议。

豫金刚石营收连降，股东难获主营收益，遂股权质押获资金，保留控制权并套取巨款，此行为致公司巨亏，打击市场信心，债权人受损。本文通过对豫金刚石股权质押舞弊案分析研究发现：豫金刚石股权质押财务舞弊案件是实际控制人出于私利挖空企业资产的结果。豫金刚石舞弊动因可总结为（1）监事会职能缺失，内部控制机制形同虚设，未能有效监督并约束管理层的行为；（2）股东在面临高额债务压力时，企图通过分离控制权和现金流权，以保持其对公司决策的绝对影响力；（3）为防范股价的持续下跌导致的强制平仓风险；（4）股权质押舞弊隐蔽性强，外审机构连聘多年导致定性思维固化难以发现审计风险。对此，本文提出四个层面的防范对策：（1）股东积极配合细化披露质押资金用途，股东话语权随质押比例增高而减弱；（2）公司治理方面，上市公司应提高监事会有效性、规范股权质押信息披露格式；（3）外审机构保持高度独立性、引入现代风险导向审计工作思路；（4）监管机构差异化抽检审计报告、完善会计师事务所轮换制度、创建监管信息共享平台、利用金融机构扩充信息获取渠道。本文从多视角提出预防上市公司股权质押财务舞弊的对策建议，期望对我国资本市场稳健发展提供思路。

Since 2013, financial institutions have been authorized to engage in equity pledge activities in the stock market, leading to rapid development of equity pledging in China due to its easy operation and low entry barriers. Equity pledging enables shareholders to quickly access needed funds while also separating their control and cash flow rights. Consequently, the controlling entities of listed companies have frequently manipulated their financial statements through equity pledging in the financial market. Building on existing research, this paper utilizes case analysis to investigate the reasons and techniques behind such fraudulent practices and presents recommendations for preventing equity pledge financial fraud.

Yu diamond's revenue has declined, and it is difficult for shareholders to obtain the main income, so they have pledged their shares to obtain funds, retain control and arbitrage huge sums of money, which has caused huge losses to the company, hit market confidence, and damaged creditors. Through the analysis of the Yu Diamond equity pledge fraud case, this paper finds that the Yu Diamond equity pledge financial fraud case is the result of the actual controller hollowing out the company's assets for selfish interests. The motives of Yu diamond fraud can be summarized as follows: (1) the inaction of the board of supervisors and the failure of internal control; (2) the shareholders expect to separate the control and cash flow rights in the case of high liabilities and maintain the absolute voice of the major shareholders; (3) in order to avoid the continuous decline of the stock price, the stock price is forced to liquidate; (4) the equity pledge fraud is highly concealed, and the qualitative thinking of the external audit agency is solidified. In this regard, this paper proposes four levels of preventive countermeasures: (1) shareholders actively cooperate with the detailed disclosure of the use of pledged funds, and the shareholder's voice weakens with the increase of the pledge ratio; (2) in terms of corporate governance, listed companies should improve the effectiveness of the board of supervisors and standardize the disclosure format of equity pledge information; (3) external audit institutions maintain a high degree of independence and introduce modern risk-oriented audit ideas; (4) differentiated sampling audit reports by regulators, improve the rotation system of accounting firms, and create a regulatory information sharing platform; Expand access to information with financial institutions. This paper puts forward countermeasures and suggestions to prevent financial fraud of equity pledge of listed companies from multiple perspectives, hoping to provide ideas for the steady development of China's capital market.

[1] Carey Catherine, Hodges Jacob, Webb John K. Changes in state legislation and the impacts on elder financial fraud and exploitation[J]. Journal of Elder Abuse and Neglect,2018, 30(4):309-319.

[2] Beasley, M.S. An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. The Accounting Review,October 1996(71).

[3] Skousen C J,Wright C J,Smith K R. Detecting and predicting financial statement fraud:The effectiveness ofthe fraud triangle and SAS No.99[J].Social Science Electronic Publishing,2013,13:53-81

[4] K. Fuad,A.B. Lestari,R.T.Handayani.Fraud Pentagon as a Measurement Tool for

[5] Ye Li. Identification and Prevention of Financial Fraud of Listed Companies in the Era of Digital Economy – A Forensic Accounting Perspective[J]. Journal of Global Economy, Business and Finance,2021,3(1):27-35

[6] Cottrell, D. M, Albrecht, W. S. Recognizing the Symptoms of Employee Fraud [J]. Health Care Financial Management, 1994(5): 19-25

[7] Beneish. What the Treadway Commissions Control Study Means to You [J]. Journal of Accountancy, 2015, 19(11): 52-59.

[8] Kumar P, Langberg N. Corporate fraud and investment distortions in efficient capit

[9] Shevlin Terry. Predicting Material Accounting Misstatements[J].Contemporary Accounting Research,2016(01):77-82.

[10] Dan Yang ,Hao Jiao, Roger Buckland. The determinants of financial fraud in Chinese firms does corporate governance as an institutional innovation matter[J]. Technological Forecasting & Social Change,2017(11):17-25.

[11] Nadkarni, S. Herrmann, P. O. L . CEO Personality, Strategic Flexibility, and Firm Performance: The Case of the Indian Business Process Outsourcing Industry[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2010, 53(5):1050- 1073.

[12] Farber D B. Restoring trust after fraud: Does corporate governance matter[J]. Accounting Review,2011,80 (2):539-561.

[13] Chen J, Gumming D, Hou W. Executive integrity, audit opinion, and fraud in Chinese listed firms[J].Emerging Markets Review, 2013, 15(2):72-91.

[14] Yang D. The Determinants Of Financial Fraud In Chinese Firms: Does Corporate Governance As An Institutional Innovation Matter?[J]. Technological Forecasting & Social Change,2017(125): 309-320.

[15] Kamlesh Tiwari,Mohammad Shadab Khan. Sustainability Accounting and Reporting in t he Industry 4.0[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2020,(1):1-14.

[16] Agelin Gladston,Arun Prasad Mohan. Mohamed Asfak R.Merkle Tree and Blockchain- Based Cloud Data Auditing[J].International Journal of Cloud Applications and Computing,2020(3):54-66.

[17] Soma Sinha.Blockchain—Opportunities and Challenges for Accounting Professional[J].J ournal of Corporate Accounting & Finance,2020,(2):6

[18] Ye Li. Identification and Prevention of Financial Fraud of Listed Companies in the Era of Digital Economy – A Forensic Accounting Perspective[J]. Journal of Global Economy, Business and Finance,2021,3(1):

[19] 钱爱民,张晨宇.股权质押与信息披露策略[J]. 会计研究,2018(12):034 40.

[20] 徐会超,潘临,张熙萌．大股东股权质押与审计师选择——来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J].中国软科学2019（8）：135-143．.

[21] 洪荭,胡华夏,郭春飞.基于GONE理论的上市公司财务报告舞弊识别研究[J].会计研究,2012（08）：84-90+97.

[22] 梁仕念.CFO个人特征对财务舞弊的影响研究[J].商业会计,2019（15）:4-8.

[23] 黄世忠,叶钦华,徐珊,叶凡.2010～2019年中国上市公司财务舞弊分析[J].财会月刊,2020（14）:153-160.

[24] 朱华军.浅析企业财务报表舞弊行为特征及预警信号[J].会计师,2018（02）:36-37

[25] 文炳洲,焦少杰.利益驱使、中介背书与上市公司财务舞弊——基于2008—2017年证监会处罚公告书[J/OL].财会通讯:2020（11）：1-5

[26] 柯艳蓉,李玉敏．控股股东股权质押、投资效率与公司期权价值．[J].经济管理,2019（12）: 123-139.

[27] 崔苗青.财务舞弊常用手段及其防范[J].会计师,2020（16）:26-27.

[28] 赵纳晖,张天洋.基于MD&A文本和深度学习模型的财务报告舞弊识别[J/OL].会计之友,2021（12）:1-10.

[29] 何威风,李思昊,周子露.控股股东股权质押与股份回购[J].中国软科学,2021（7）：106-119．

[30] 徐龙炳,汪斌.股权质押下的控股股东增持：“价值信号”还是“行为信号”? [J].金融研究,2021（1）：188-206

[31] 杨青,叶莹莹．民营企业股权质押何以缓解“融资贵”：从控制权转移风险的视角[J].上海经济,2020（3）：91-105.

[32] 徐寿福,贺学会,陈晶萍．股权质押与大股东双重择时动机[J].财经研究,2016（6）：74-86.

[33] 余峰燕,朱婧知．股权质押,控股股东制衡与银行信贷定价[J].南开学报（哲学社会科学版）,2020（5）：159-172.

[34] 郝项超,梁琪.最终控制人股权质押损害公司价值么?[J].会计研究,2009,(7):57-63+96.

[35] 周中胜,陈汉文.大股东资金占用与外部审计监督[J].审计研究,2006( 3) : 73-81.

[36] 郑国坚,林东杰,张飞达.大股东财务困境、掏空与公司治理的有效性——来自大股东财务数据的证据[J].管理世界2013(5)：157-168.

[37] 谢德仁,廖珂.控股股东股权质押与上市公司真实活动盈余管理[J].审会计研究,2018(8)21-27.

[38] 李乾杰,郭芳源.集团公司财务舞弊案件影响与启示[J].新经济,2015（05）:89-90

[39] 邵美晨.财务舞弊的手段剖析与防范措施研究[J].纳税,2017（29）:13-14.

[40] 韩志萍,刘子惠.瑞幸咖啡财务造假问题思考[J].合作经济与科技,2020（20）:174-175.

[41] 牛羿恒.上市公司财务舞弊动因与治理研究——基于舞弊风险因子理论与博弈论共同视角[J].财会通讯,2020（12）:99-103.

[42] 吴春梅.论析上市公司财务舞弊行为防范与治理[J].现代商业,2013（08）:254-255.

[43] 陈建平.试论内部控制与财务舞弊的影响关系[J].现代经济信息,2015（20）:235.

[44] 张志涛,毛加昌.造假-监督博弈模型视角下的财务舞弊动因及对策分析——以绿大地为例[J].会计师,2017（11）:38-41.

[45] 吴莹.内部控制视角下的财务舞弊防范研究[J].财务与金融,2021（04）:38-42.

[46] 张力派,程晨,陈玲玲.大数据时代对上市公司财务舞弊的影响——研究综述及展望[J].管理现代化,2020（05）:122-129.

[47] 李浩尘,谢劲松.基于信息理论与技术的审计证据强度辨识方法[J].审计月刊,2019（12）:7-9.

[48] 刘杰,韩洪灵,陈汉文.大数据时代的审计变革:分析框架与实现路径[J].财务研究,2019（03）:42-53.

[49] 胡明霞.基于财会监督视角防治财务舞弊——以瑞幸咖啡为例[J].财务与会计,2021（18）:44-47.

[50] 沈添.会计师事务所应对财务舞弊审计分析[J].审计与理财,2021（12）:50-51.

[51] 张兴东,魏丹,刘宣杰.上市公司财务舞弊与审计对策研究[J].企业改革与管理,2021（22）:127-128.

[52] 孙继辉,沈子琪.基于演化博弈模型的社会审计监管对审计合谋影响研究[J].财会通讯,2021（23）:123-127.

[53] 闫明杰.证券交易所非行政处罚性监管的效应分析——基于会计监管视角[J].财会月刊,2021（18）:131-135.

[54] 郜秀菊,王晓东,王帅超.证券虚假陈述案件中法务会计的应用分析[J].财会通讯,2021（23）:110-114.