在新时代背景下，区域协调发展不仅是我国建设社会主义现代化强国的必然选择，而且是我国经济社会高质量发展的重要途径。要实现区域协调发展，关键是要大力推进科技创新，打造创新驱动力，合理调整经济结构，推动产业结构升级，实现“集约式增长”。当前，国际关系复杂多变、新冠疫情依然严峻、国际竞争加剧，推动产业结构升级有利于提高全社会劳动生产率，缩小区域之间经济社会等方面的发展差距，实现区域之间的协调发展。因此，研究产业结构升级对区域协调发展的影响，具有现实意义与理论意义。

本文首先系统梳理、评述国内外相关文献，并对产业结构升级与区域协调发展的概念进行界定，然后收集2005—2020年我国30个省、市、区（不含港澳台和西藏地区）的数据，基于构建的评价指标体系运用投影寻踪法测度各样本区域协调发展水平，作为被解释变量，其次基于构建的评价指标测度各样本的产业结构升级的合理化水平与产业结构升级的高级化水平，作为解释变量，选取金融发展水平、城镇化水平和政府干预程度等指标作为控制变量，运用空间杜宾模型实证分析产业结构升级的合理化水平与高级化水平对区域协调发展的影响。结果显示：（1）产业结构升级的高级化与合理化能够有效地促进本地区区域协调发展，同时，高级化也能够促进邻近地区的区域协调发展，但合理化对邻近地区的区域协调发展没有显著影响；（2）对于东部各省份而言，产业结构升级的高级化能促进本地区的区域协调发展，而抑制邻近地区的区域协调发展，其合理化能促进本地区的区域协调发展，而对邻近地区的区域协调发展没有显著影响；（3）对于中部各省份而言，产业结构升级的高级化能促进本地区和邻近地区的区域协调发展，而合理化抑制本地区和邻近地区的区域协调发展；（4）对于西部各省份而言，产业结构升级的高级化能促进本地区和邻近地区的区域协调发展，而其合理化促进本地区区域协调发展而抑制邻近地区的区域协调发展。最后提出政企合作推动产业结构升级、协调产业之间的生产要素、鼓励科技创新、针对区域差异化制定区域协调发展政策、加强区域之间的经济文化交流等对策与建议，以期激发创新活力，优化产业结构，促进产业升级，推动区域协调发展。

In the background of the new era, regional coordinated development is not only an inevitable choice for my country to build a powerful modern socialist country, but also an important approach to high-quality economic and social development in my country. In order to achieve coordinated regional development, the key is to vigorously promote scientific and technological innovation, create a driving force for innovation, rationally adjust the economic structure, promote the upgrading of industrial structure, and achieve "intensive growth".At present, international relations are complex and changeable, the COVID-19 is still severe, and international competition is intensifying, promoting the upgrading of the industrial structure is conducive to improving the labor productivity of the whole society, narrowing the development gap, and realizing regional coordinated development. Therefore, this paper empirically studies the impact of industrial structure upgrading on regional coordinated development, which is conducive to enriching relevant theories and providing policy references for government departments, and has certain theoretical and practical significance.

This paper firstly systematically sorts out and reviews relevant domestic and foreign literatures, defines regional coordinated development and industrial structure upgrade, and then, collects the data of 30 provinces in my country (excluding Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan and Tibet) from 2005 to 2020, based on the constructed evaluation index system, uses the Projection Pursuit Classification based on Real coding based Accelerated Genetic Algorithm to measure the level of regional coordinated development of each sample as the explained variable. Secondly, based on the constructed evaluation indicators, measure the premiumization level and rationalization level of industrial structure of each sample as explanatory variables, and selects indicators such as financial development level, urbanization level and government intervention level as control variables, Finally, use Spatial Panel Dubin model to empirically analyze the impact of premiumization and rationalization of industrial structure upgrading on regional coordinated development.

The empirical results show: (1) The premiumization and rationalization of industrial structure can effectively promote the regional coordinated development. Simultaneously, the premiumization can also promote the regional coordinated development of neighboring regions, the rationalization has no impact on regional coordinated development of neighboring areas. (2) For provinces in the eastern region, the premiumization of industrial structure can effectively promote the regional coordinated development and inhibits the regional coordinated development of neighboring areas, the rationalization promote the regional coordinated development and has no impact on regional coordinated development of neighboring areas.(3) For the provinces in the central region, the premiumization of industrial structure can effectively promote the regional coordinated development of the region and neighboring areas, the rationalization inhibits the regional coordinated development of the region and neighboring areas.(4) For the provinces in the western region, the premiumization of industrial structure can effectively promote the regional coordinated development of the region and neighboring areas, the rationalization the rationalization inhibits the regional coordinated development of the region and neighboring areas and inhibits the regional coordinated development of neighboring areas. Finally, it puts forward countermeasures and suggestions such as government-enterprise cooperation to promote industrial structure upgrading, coordinate production factors between industries, encourage technological innovation, formulate regional coordinated development policies for regional differentiation, and strengthen economic and cultural exchanges between regions, in order to stimulate innovation vitality, optimize the industrial structure, promote industrial upgrading, and promote coordinated regional development.

[1] Williamson J G. Regional Inequality and the Process of National Development: a Description of the Patterns [J]. Economic Development and Cultural Change,1965, 13(4):1-84

[2] Goulet D. The Cruel Choice: A New Concept in the Theory of Development [M].New York: Atheneum, 1971.

[3] Ezcurra R, Pascual P. Fiscal Decentralization and Regional Disparities: Evidence from Several European Union Countries [J]. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 2008,40(5):1185-1201.

[4] Barrios S, Strobl E. The Dynamics of Regional Inequalities[J]. Regional Science and Urban Economics,2009,39(5):575-591.

[5] Geppert K, Stephan A. Regional Disparities in the European Union: Convergence and Agglomeration[J]. Papers in Regional Science, 2008,87(2):193-217.

[6] Badia-Miro M, Guilera J, Lains P. Regional Incomes in Portugal: Industrialization, Integration and Inequality, 1890–1980[J]. Revista de Historia Economica,2012, 30(2): 225-244.

[7] Tirado D A , Díez-Minguela A, Martinez-Galarraga J. Regional Inequality and Economic Development in Spain, 1860-2010[J]. Journal of Historical Geography,2016,10(54):87-98.

[8] Benini R, Czyzewski A. Regional Disparities and Economic Growth in Russia:New Growth Patterns and Catching up [J]. Economic Change and Restructuring, 2007, 40(03):91-135.

[9] Fleisher B, Li H, Zhao MQ. Human Capital, Economic Growth, and Regional Inequality in China[J]. Journal of Development Economics,2010,92(2): 215-231.

[10] Clark C. The Conditions of Economic Progress[M]. London: Macmillan, 1951.

[11] Peneder M. Industrial Structure and Aggregate Growth[J]. Structural Change & Economic Dynamics, 2003, 14(4):427-448.

[12] Jorgenson D W, Timmer M P. Structural Change in Advanced Nations: A New Set of Stylised Facts [J]. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 2011, 113(1):1-29.

[13] Eichengreen B J, Park D, Shin K. When Fast Growing Economies Slow Down: International Evidence and Implications for China [J]. Asian Economic Papers, 2012, 11(1):42-87.

[14] Humphrey J, Schmitz H. How does Insertion in Global Value Chains Affect Upgrading in Industrial Clusters?[J]. Regional Studies,2002,36(9):1017-1027.

[15] Poon S C. Beyond the Global Production Networks: a Case of Further Upgrading of Taiwan's Information Technology Industry [J]. International Journal of Technology &Globalization,2004,1(1):130-144.

[16] Psacharopoulos G ,Woodhall M. Education for Development: An Analysis of Investment Choices[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press,1986.

[17] Benhabib J, Spiegel M M. The Role of Human Capital in Economic Development Evidence from Aggregate Cross-Country Data [J]. Journal of Monetary Economics, 1994,34(2):143-173.

[18] Ciccone A, Papaioannou E. Human Capital, the Structure of Production, and Growth[J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics ,2009 ,91(1):66-82.

[19] Porter M. Location, Competition, and Economic Development: Local Clusters in a Global Economy [J]. Economic Development Quarterly,2000(104):15-35.

[20] Watanabe C, Asgari B, Nagamatsu A. Virtuous Cycle between R&D, Functionality Development and Assimilation Capacity for Competitive Strategy in Japan’s High-Technology Industry[J]. Technovation,2003(23):879-900.

[21] Acemoglu D, Guerrieri V. Captial Deepening and Nonbalanced Economic Growth[J]. Joural of Political Economy,2008,116(3):467-498.

[22] 梁剑峰.毛泽东区域经济均衡发展战略简论[J]. 山西农业大学学报(社会科学版),2008(01):55-57+64.

[23] 王琴梅.区域协调发展内涵新解[J]. 甘肃社会科学,2007(06):46-50.

[24] 姜文仙,覃成林.区域协调发展研究的进展与方向[J]. 经济与管理研究,2009(10):90-95.

[25] 郝寿义.区域经济学原理[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2007.

[26] 陈秀山,杨艳.我国区域发展战略的演变与区域协调发展的目标选择[J]. 教学与研究,2008(05):5-12.

[27] 肖金成.十六大以来区域政策的成效与促进区域协调发展的政策建议[J]. 西南民族大学学报(人文社科版),2008(02):104-109.

[28] 刘乃全.中国经济学如何研究协调发展[J]. 改革,2016(05):131-141.

[29] 蒋清海.区域协调发展:对区域差距的分析与思考[J]. 贵州社会科学,1995(02):7-14+19.

[30] 高志刚.中国区域经济发展及区域经济差异研究述评[J]. 当代财经,2002(05):7-9.

[31] 吴殿廷,何龙娟,任春艳.从可持续发展到协调发展——区域发展观念的新解读[J]. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),2006(04):140-143.

[32] 孙久文.论新时代区域协调发展战略的发展与创新[J]. 国家行政学院学报,2018(04):109-114+151.

[33] 张军扩.中国的区域政策和区域发展:回顾与前瞻[J]. 理论前沿,2008(14):10-13.

[34] 安树伟,郁鹏.“十一五”以来我国区域经济运行态势及未来政策取向[J]. 西南民族大学学报(人文社科版),2008(10):65-72.

[35] 魏后凯.我国西部大开发的成效与未来政策展望[J]. 新西部(下半月),2009(12):8-9.

[36] 安树伟,任媛.“十一五”以来我国区域经济发展的新态势与新特点[J]. 西发展研究,2009(09):9-14.

[37] 任媛,吉新峰,安树伟.“十一五”以来我国四大区域发展比较及“十二五”期间发展方向研究[J]. 未来与发展, 2010(08):18-23.

[38] 石清华.西部大开发以来西部地区经济收敛性及影响因素分析[J]. 经济问题探索,2011(08):71-76.

[39] 肖金成,安树伟.从区域非均衡发展到区域协调发展——中国区域发展40年[J]. 区域经济评论,2019(01):13-24.

[40] 李国平,彭思奇,曾先峰,杨洋.中国西部大开发战略经济效应评价——基于经济增长质量的视角[J].当代经济科学,2011,33(04):1-10+124.

[41] 淦未宇,徐细雄,易娟.西部大开发战略实施效果的阶段性评价与改进对策[J]. 经济地理,2011(01):40-46.

[42] 韩兆洲.区域经济协调发展统计测度研究[D].厦门大学博士学位论文,2000.

[43] 徐盈之,吴海明.环境约束下区域协调发展水平综合效率的实证研究[J]. 中国工业经济,2010(08):34-44.

[44] 薄文广,安虎森,李杰.主体功能区建设与区域协调发展:促进亦或冒进[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2011,21(10):121-128.

[45] 冯江茹,范新英.中国区域协调发展水平综合评价及测度[J]. 企业经济,2014(08):136-139.

[46] 邓宏兵,曹媛媛.中国区域协调发展的绩效测度[J]. 区域经济评论,2019(01):25-32.

[47] 姜泽华,白艳.产业结构升级的内涵与影响因素分析[J]. 当代经济研究, 2006,134(10):53-56.

[48] 方慧,吕静,段国蕊.中国承接服务业国际转移产业结构升级效应的实证研究[J]. 世界经济研究,2012(6):60-65+90-91.

[49] 潘冬青，尹忠明.对开放条件下产业升级内涵的再认识[J]. 管理世界,2013(05):178-179.

[50] 于斌斌.金融集聚促进了产业结构升级吗:空间溢出的视角——基于中国城市动态空间面板模型的分析[J]. 国际金融研究,2017(2):14-25.

[51] 徐德云.产业结构升级形态决定、测度的一个理论解释及验证[J]. 财政研究,2008(1):46-49.

[52] 王林梅,邓玲.我国产业结构优化升级的实证研究——以长江经济带为例[J]. 经济问题,2015(05):39-43.

[53] 陶长琪,周璇.产业融合下的产业结构优化升级效应分析——基于信息产业与制造业耦联的实证研究[J]. 产业经济研究,2015(3):21-31,110.

[54] 金英君.人口老龄化背景下我国人口结构特征对产业结构优化升级的影响研究[J]. 科学决策,2018(11):1-17.

[55] 曾国安,马宇佳.土地价格对城市产业结构升级的影响研究——基于全国105个地级及以上城市数据的实证分析[J]. 宏观经济研究,2019(06):95-107.

[56] 陈东景,彭明铭,刘瑞超.FDI与环境规制对产业结构升级的影响研究[J]. 江汉学术,2019,38(05):84-93.

[57] 仲颖佳,孙攀,高照军.基于时空数据的财政政策对产业结构升级的影响研究——来自281个城市的经验证据[J]. 软科学,2020,34(10):56-62.

[58] Akamatsu K. A Historical Pattern of Economic Growth in Developing Countries[J]. The Developing Economies,1962,1(1):3-25.

[59] Vernon R. International Investment and Investment Trade in The Product Cycle[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics,1966(80):190-207.

[60] 韩秀兰,崔梦韬.民间投资、产业结构与经济增长[J]. 工业技术经济,2021,40(09):143-149.

[61] 蓝管秀锋,匡贤明.产业结构转型升级对城乡收入差距的影响分析——基于金融“脱实向虚”视角[J]. 产经评论,2021,12(03):104-113.

[62] Fukuyama H, Weber W L.A Directional Slacks-based Measure of Technical Inefficiency [J]. Socio-economic Planning Sciences,2009,43(4):274-287.

[63] Chung Y H, Fare R, Grosskopf S. Productivity and Undesirable Outputs: A Directional Distance Function Approach[J]. Microeconomics,1997,51(3):229-240.

[64] 单豪杰.中国资本存量K的再估算:1952-2006年[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究,2008(10):17-31.

[65] 韩永辉,黄亮雄,王贤彬.产业结构优化升级改进生态效率了吗?[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究,2016,33(04):40-59.

[66] 刘伟,张辉,黄泽华.中国产业结构高度与工业化进程和地区差异的考察[J]. 经济学动态,2008(11):4-8.

[67] 周璇,陶长琪.技术融合式创新对产业结构高度化的驱动效应研究——基于垂直式知识溢出视角[J]. 管理评论,2021,33(07):130-142.

[68] 郑鑫.城镇化对中国经济增长的贡献及其实现途径[J]. 中国农村经济,2014(06):4-15.

[69] 颜廷峰,袁安妮,徐旭初.互联网金融、政府干预与经济增长质量——基于面板门限回归模型的实证检验[J]. 财政研究,2019(09):47-61.

[70] 吕朝凤.金融发展、不完全契约与经济增长[J]. 经济学(季刊),2018,17(01):155-188.