钢结构的应用和研究己有近百年的历史，技术上日趋成熟。但关于考虑填充墙在钢框架结构中作为抗侧力构件的问题，国内外的研究都十分有限。我国的钢结构设计规范也没有具体涉及到这方面的内容，且在结构计算时各类砌体填充墙常不考虑其对钢框架抗侧力的贡献。然而在实际的受力过程中，由于砌体填充墙与框架梁柱之间的耦连作用，使填充墙框架结构的受力情况与纯框架的受力情况有较大差异，因此其受力机理及承载力方面的研究具有重要的理论意义和工程参考价值。本文研究了填充墙钢框架的整体受力性能，以更好地协调结构承载力、刚度和延性三者的关系，对于指导设计工作具有十分重要的现实意义。 本文通过对4个系列共15个试件的计算与分析，主要研究了填充墙钢框架的在单调和循环荷载作用下的受力性能、破坏机理及轴压比、高跨比、接触面上的摩擦系数、填充墙本构关系等参数对填充墙钢框架整体受力性能的影响。得出的主要结论为：在水平荷载作用下，填充墙钢框架结构中砌体填充墙如同斜压支撑一样成为框架结构的斜向支撑并约束框架结构的水平位移，从而充当结构的主要抗侧力构件，有效地提高了结构的刚度和承载力；填充墙钢框架在循环荷载作用下，结构有明显的滑移现象，整体耗能性能较好；在水平荷载作用下，填充墙受力区域主要集中在沿受力方向对角线范围之内，裂缝也主要在该区域产生，而对角线范围之外等效应力相对很小；填充墙角部与梁柱连接部位的应力集中现象严重，在地震荷载作用下会首先发生破坏；填充墙钢框架结构的破坏是由于填充墙破坏而引起的结构承载力的降低，作为主要受力构件的钢框架还没有发生破坏，结构还有很大的安全富裕度，在地震中，如果只填充墙破坏，则仅需进行墙体置换，结构仍可继续使用；填充墙钢框架节点域受力复杂，为满足“强节点弱构件”的抗震设计要求，应在结构设计中对节点域钢板宽厚比予以限值；结构的轴压比的改变对钢框架的承载力、变形能力和延性影响较小，说明填充墙能够降低P-Δ效应对钢框架的影响，且轴压比在小于0.4的范围各项受力性能较优；高跨比大于0.5时，结构表现出良好的耗能能力和延性性能，抗震性能较好；随着填充墙与钢框架粘结系数的增大，极限承载能力变化相对较小，但初始刚度增大，结构延性性能出现劣化。 本文全面、系统、深入地分析了填充墙钢框架在单调和循环荷载作用下的受力性能，研究工作和得到的结论对于指导工程设计具有重要的参考价值，为进一步研究填充墙钢框架的抗震性能打下了良好的基础。

Many achievements have made in the research and application of structure steel since almost one hundred years ago. But there is little research about fill wall with frame as a lateral resistant member, and there are correlative clauses about there in steel structures Design Specification (GBJ17-88). There is a few consideration of the masonry infill panel’s contribution to the lateral resistance of steel frame under calculation; actually, the load bearing of the masonry-infilled steel frame is far from the bare frame for the interaction between the panel and the frame. So the study of it possesses important theoretic and engineering reference value. This paper researched steel frame construction of filled wall effect on the whole stress performance from many parameters in order to coordinate the relationship between the structure’s strength rigidity and ductility, It is very meaningful to direct design. The paper researches studies the performance and fail mechanism of filler wall, steel frame construction under monotone and circle loads, and the effect of performance about filler wall steel frame with axial-press ratio, depth-span ratio, friction factor of contact plate, filler wall material coefficient. It got some main conclusions: the filler wall of steel frame as a baroclinic brace restraint the horizon displacement of frame structure. It effectively enhances the rigidity and bearing capacity of structure as a lateral resistant member. The filler wall steel frame has an obvious slipping phenomena and well power-wasting nature under circle load. The stress surface region of filler wall and crack is mostly centralizing at stress direction of diagonal. The equivalent effective stress of this region is comparatively small. The stress concentration phenomena focus on the corner of filler wall and the connection of part between beam and pole under earthquake load that will damage firstly. The reduction of bearing capacity is aroused by the destruction of filler wall. As a mostly bearing structure, the steel frame doesn’t damage at this time, showing that structure have great safety margin. Furthermore, when filler wall is at damage moment, structure may carry over using below exchanging filler wall, and the bearing capacity frame have little infection. The node of filler wall steel frame has complex bearing, for the request of earthquake-resistance design should “powerful node, weak construction”. It should restrain the width-thick ratio of steel plate at node region, increase the width of steel plate at node region, or install ribbed stiffener, to stiffen node region. The change of axial-press ratio has less infection for the bearing capacity, deformability and ductility. Filler wall can recede the infection of P-Δeffect. When axial-press ratio of structure is less than 0.4, all of bearing capability is good. The structure shows better power-wasting ductility and earthquake-resistance capability, when depth-span ratio of structure is larger than 0.5. With development of felt coefficient between filler wall of steel frame, the limiting load is small, but original rigidity is accretion, ductility capacity appear deterioration. The paper analyzes bearing capacity of steel frame construction of fill wall under the monotone circle load deeply. It is valuable to modify related codes, and to direct practical engineering design. It is a good foundation for earth-quake resistance of filler wall steel frame construction.