随着我国可持续发展意识的提高，企业可持续绩效也受到了更多的重视。对于供应链核心企业来说，平衡经营业绩、环境保护和社会责任之间的关系，以确保企业的可持续发展显得尤为重要。战略导向决定了企业的发展方向，影响着企业的创新战略、创新活动以及企业绩效。现有研究认为供应链创新不仅能提高供应链竞争力，而且能够促进企业绩效的提升，但目前供应链创新对可持续绩效影响的效应尚不明确，战略导向与供应链创新的协同如何影响可持续绩效缺乏深入研究。因此，研究战略导向与供应链创新协同对可持续绩效的影响具有重要意义。

本研究遵循“战略-创新-绩效”的分析范式，基于资源编排理论、组织学习理论、三重底线理论和权变理论，提出战略导向、供应链创新与可持续绩效之间的关系假设。借鉴成熟量表，设计调查问卷对各个变量进行测度，选取国家供应链创新地区的企业为研究对象，运用层次回归分析法研究了战略导向与供应链创新协同对可持续绩效的影响。研究结果表明：战略导向与供应链创新之间具有协同性，环境不确定性在学习导向与供应链创新之间具有负向调节作用，供应链创新在战略导向影响可持续绩效的过程中发挥了有效的中介作用，战略导向与管理创新的协同能够对企业的可持续绩效产生积极的影响。

本研究通过文献计量法分析和总结了战略导向、供应链创新、可持续绩效和环境不确定性的研究现状，并对相关文献进行了系统性综述。通过研究不同变量之间的关系，完善了供应链创新和可持续绩效相关的研究，拓展了战略导向和环境不确定性的权变研究，并确定了战略导向与供应链创新的有效协同模式，有利于企业可持续绩效的提升。在管理实践中，供应链企业应加强对供应链创新的认知，提高供应链创新能力，并注重外部环境变化的影响，对战略导向和供应链创新进行有效管理和配置，使企业可持续绩效最大化，以实现可持续发展。

With the increasing awareness of sustainable development in China, corporate sustainable performance has also received more attention. For supply chain core enterprises, it is particularly important to balance the relationship between business performance, environmental protection and social responsibility to ensure the sustainable development of the enterprise. Strategic orientation determines the development direction of a company and influences its innovation strategy, innovation activities and corporate performance. Existing studies have concluded that supply chain innovation not only improves supply chain competitiveness but also promotes corporate performance, but the effects of supply chain innovation on sustainable performance are still unclear, and how the synergy between strategic orientation and supply chain innovation affects sustainable performance lacks in-depth research. Therefore, it is of great significance to study the impact of synergy between strategic orientation and supply chain innovation on sustainable performance.

This study follows the paradigm of "strategy-innovation-performance" and proposes hypotheses on the relationship between strategic orientation, supply chain innovation and sustainable performance based on resource orchestration theory, organizational learning theory, triple bottom line theory and contingency theory. A questionnaire was designed to measure the variables by drawing on established scales, and the impact of synergy between strategic orientation and supply chain innovation on sustainable performance was investigated using hierarchical regression analysis. The results show that there is synergy between strategic orientation and supply chain innovation, environmental uncertainty has a negative moderating effect between learning orientation and supply chain innovation, supply chain innovation plays an effective mediating role in the process of strategic orientation affecting sustainable performance, and synergy between strategic orientation and management innovation can have a positive impact on sustainable performance.

This study analyzes and summarizes the research status of strategic orientation, supply chain innovation, sustainable performance and environmental uncertainty by bibliometric method, and systematically reviews the relevant literature. By studying the relationship between variables, the research on supply chain innovation and sustainable performance is improved, the contingency research on strategic orientation and environmental uncertainty is expanded, and an effective synergistic model of strategic orientation and supply chain innovation is determined, which is conducive to the improvement of sustainable performance of enterprises. In management practice, supply chain enterprises should strengthen their cognition of supply chain innovation, improve supply chain innovation ability, and pay attention to the influence of external environment changes, effectively manage and configure strategic orientation and supply chain innovation, so as to maximize the sustainable performance of enterprises and achieve sustainable development.

[1]王灿,张雅欣.碳中和愿景的实现路径与政策体系[J].中国环境管理,2020,12(06):58-64.

[2]孙永磊,宋晶,谢永平.企业战略导向对创新活动的影响——来自苹果公司的案例分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2015,36(02):101-110.

[3]宋晶,陈菊红,孙永磊.双元战略导向对合作创新绩效的影响研究——网络嵌入性的调节作用[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2014,35(06):102-109.

[4]葛晓永,吴青熹,赵曙明.基于科技型企业的学习导向、团队信任与企业创新绩效关系的研究[J].管理学报,2016,13(07):996-1002.

[5]李丽珍,刘勇,王晖.以可持续供应链创新推进传统产业转型升级[J].宏观经济管理, 2020(11):44-50+56.

[6]Shete P. C., Ansari Z. N., Kant R. A Pythagorean fuzzy AHP approach and its application to evaluate the enablers of sustainable supply chain innovation[J]. Sustainable Production and Consumption,2020,23:77-93.

[7]郭羽含,于俊宇,刘万军,等.制造业可持续供应链网络建模及求解[J].计算机集成制造系统,2021,27(07):2112-2133.

[8]刘嵘.华为可持续供应链发展历程及启示[J].财会月刊,2019(17):143-149.

[9]张荣杰,张健.可持续供应链管理研究现状综述[J].生态经济,2012(01):90-93+97.

[10]李巍.战略导向均衡对产品创新与经营绩效影响研究[J].科研管理,2015,36(01): 143-151.

[11]康青松.组织学习导向、知识转移和吸收能力对国际企业绩效的影响研究[J].管理学报, 2015,12(01):53-60.

[12]吕斯尧,赵文红,杨特.知识基础、战略导向对新创企业绩效的影响——基于注意力基础的视角[J].研究与发展管理,2019,31(02):1-10.

[13]Gotteland D., Shock J., Sari S. Strategic orientations, marketing proactivity and firm market performance[J]. Industrial Marketing Management,2020,91:610-620.

[14]Hughes M., Chang Y., Hodgkinson I., et al. The multi-level effects of corporate entrepreneurial orientation on business unit radical innovation and financial performance[J]. Long Range Planning, 2021,54(1):101989.

[15]贾建锋,唐贵瑶,李俊鹏,等.高管胜任特征与战略导向的匹配对企业绩效的影响[J].管理世界,2015(02):120-132.

[16]彭正龙,何培旭.企业战略导向的权变选择及差别绩效效应:探索性/利用性学习的中介作用和产业类型的调节作用[J].管理评论,2015,27(05):121-134+187.

[17]吴晓波,陈小玲,李璟琰.战略导向、创新模式对企业绩效的影响机制研究[J].科学学研究,2015,33(01):118-127.

[18]周琪,苏敬勤,长青,等.战略导向对企业绩效的作用机制研究:商业模式创新视角[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2020,41(10):74-92.

[19]魏江,张妍,龚丽敏.基于战略导向的企业产品创新绩效研究——研发网络的视角[J].科学学研究,2014,32(10):1593-1600.

[20]Adams P., Freitas I. M., Fontana R. Strategic orientation, innovation performance and the moderating influence of marketing management[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2019,97:129-140.

[21]韩晨,谢言,高山行.多重战略导向与企业创新绩效：一个被调节的中介效应模型[J].管理工程学报,2020,34(06):29-37.

[22]Zhou W, Su D., Yang J., et al. When do strategic orientations matter to innovation performance of green-tech ventures? The moderating effects of network positions[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021,279:123743.

[23]蒋军锋,韩明君,程小燕.战略导向转换与创新过程整合关系的研究进展[J].科研管理, 2015,36(01):43-53.

[24]简兆权,王晨,陈键宏.战略导向、动态能力与技术创新:环境不确定性的调节作用[J].研究与发展管理,2015,27(02):65-76.

[25]袁野,蒋军锋,程小燕.动态能力与创新类型——战略导向的调节作用[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2016,37(04):45-58.

[26]王德胜,辛杰,吴创.战略导向、两栖创新与企业绩效[J].中国软科学, 2016(02):114-125.

[27]李炎炎,高山行,高宇.战略导向对技术创新影响的异质性讨论——竞争程度的调节作用[J].科学学研究,2016,34(08):1255-1262.

[28]Jean R., Kim D., Chiou J., et al. Strategic orientations, joint learning, and innovation generation in international customer-supplier relationships[J]. International Business Review,2018,27(4): 838-851.

[29]Han C., Zhang S. Multiple strategic orientations and strategic flexibility in product innovation[J]. European Research on Management and Business Economics,2021,27(1): 100136.

[30]宋华.新兴技术与“产业供应链+”——“互联网+”下的智慧供应链创新[J].人民论坛·学术前沿,2015(22):21-34.

[31]何继新.跨境电子商务供应链模式创新:属性特征、关系模型及前提条件[J].中国流通经济,2017,31(03):52-61.

[32]解学梅,罗丹,高彦茹.基于绿色创新的供应链企业协同机理实证研究[J].管理工程学报, 2019,33(03):116-124.

[33]Wong D., Ngai E. Critical review of supply chain innovation research (1999–2016)[J]. Industrial Marketing Management,2019,82:158-187.

[34]Gupta H., Kusi-Sarpong S., Rezaei J. Barriers and overcoming strategies to supply chain sustainability innovation[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling,2020,161:104819.

[35]Nilsson F., Göransson M. Critical factors for the realization of sustainable supply chain innovations - Model development based on a systematic literature review[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2021,296:126471.

[36]高鹏,杜建国,聂佳佳,等.不同权力结构对再制造供应链技术创新策略的影响[J].管理学报,2016,13(10):1563-1570.

[37]陈广仁,唐华军.供应链管理的开放式创新机制——基于物联网的“零边际成本”的理论假设[J].中国流通经济,2017,31(08):105-115.

[38]万骁乐,郝婷婷,戎晓霞,等.共创视角下考虑开放式创新的供应链价值创造研究[J].中国管理科学,2017,25(07):57-66.

[39]邱洪全.生鲜农产品双渠道供应链协同创新对物流服务绩效的影响[J].中国流通经济, 2017,31(09):22-30.

[40]Afraz M., Bhatti S., Ferraris A., et al. The impact of supply chain innovation on competitive advantage in the construction industry: Evidence from a moderated multi-mediation model[J]. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2021,162:120370.

[41]杨洁辉,韩庆兰,水会莉.企业环境管理、创新管理、供应链管理三维融合——供应链可持续创新系统构建及应用[J].科技进步与对策,2015,32(08):18-23.

[42]狄蓉,焦玥,赵袁军.新零售背景下零售企业供应链整合创新机制[J].企业经济, 2019(08):60-67.

[43]Lee H., Shen Z. Supply chain and logistics innovations with the Belt and Road Initiative[J]. Journal of Management Science and Engineering, 2020,5(2):77-86.

[44]王福.新零售流通供应链商业模式创新体系构建[J].当代经济管理,2020,42(07):17-26.

[45]Giovanni P., Cariola A. Process innovation through industry 4.0 technologies, lean practices and green supply chains[J]. Research in Transportation Economics,2021,90: 100869.

[46]Orji I., Liu S. A dynamic perspective on the key drivers of innovation-led lean approaches to achieve sustainability in manufacturing supply chain[J]. International Journal of Production Economics,2020,219:480-496.

[47]Chowdhury M., Quaddus M. Supply chain sustainability practices and governance for mitigating sustainability risk and improving market performance: A dynamic capability perspective[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2021,278:123521.

[48]谢琍,王婷,戴君.可持续供应链管理实践对企业绩效的影响:基于中国的实证研究[J].数理统计与管理,2017,36(04):693-702.

[49]田虹,崔悦,姜雨峰.绿色供应链管理能提升企业可持续发展吗?[J].财经论丛, 2018(10):77-85.

[50]杨红雄,刘微明,梅智伶.偏差分析下供应链可持续性合作的绩效研究[J].财经论丛, 2015(09):91-97.

[51]朱新球.供应链弹性如何影响供应链绩效:可持续性的中介效应[J].中国流通经济, 2019,33(12):42-54.

[52]Jadhav A., Orr S., Malik M. The role of supply chain orientation in achieving supply chain sustainability[J]. International Journal of Production Economics,2019,217:112-125.

[53]Foo P., Lee V., Tan G.W., et al. A gateway to realising sustainability performance via green supply chain management practices: A PLS-ANN approach[J]. Expert Systems with Applications,2018,107:1-14.

[54]Ramezankhani M., Torabi S., Vahidi F. Supply chain performance measurement and evaluation: A mixed sustainability and resilience approach[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering,2018,126:531-548.

[55]Bag S., Wood L., Xu L., et al. Big data analytics as an operational excellence approach to enhance sustainable supply chain performance[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2020,153:104559.

[56]Geyi D., Yusuf Y., Menhat M., et al. Agile capabilities as necessary conditions for maximising sustainable supply chain performance: An empirical investigation [J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2020,222:107501.

[57]曹裕,易丹,熊寿遥.基于TBL理论的可持续供应链评价[J].系统管理学报,2014,23(05): 668-673.

[58]张毕西,张明珠,韩正涛.基于模糊TOPSIS的绿色供应链绩效评价[J].天津工业大学学报,2014,33(04):76-79.

[59]戴君,贾琪,谢琍,等.基于结构方程模型的可持续供应链绩效评价研究[J].生态经济, 2015,31(04):86-89+169.

[60]蔡霞,耿修林.精益绿色供应链绩效评价设计及实证研究[J].科技管理研究, 2016,36(09):85-88.

[61]曹炳汝,樊颜青.基于DEA与主成分分析的绿色农产品供应链绩效评价研究[J].科技管理研究,2017,37(06):72-77.

[62]杜丽霞.基于平衡计分卡的绿色供应链绩效评价研究[J].商业经济,2017(11): 124-125+128.

[63]Latan H., Jabbour C. J. C., Jabbour A. B. L. S., et al. Effects of environmental strategy, environmental uncertainty and top management's commitment on corporate environmental performance: The role of environmental management accounting[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2018,180:297-306.

[64]陈彪,卢珊.环境不确定性与新创企业产品创新战略[J].当代经济研究,2019(05):64-71.

[65]刘婧,罗福凯,王京.环境不确定性与企业创新投入——政府补助与产融结合的调节作用[J].经济管理,2019,41(08):21-39.

[66]王炳成,郝兴霖,刘露.战略性新兴产业商业模式创新研究——环境不确定性与组织学习匹配视角[J].软科学,2020,34(10):50-55.

[67]王慧,孙慧,肖涵月,等.“谨小慎微”抑或“险中求胜”?——环境政策不确定性与污染密集型企业绿色创新[J].产业经济研究,2021(02):30-41+127.

[68]王则仁,刘志雄.环境不确定性对软件与信息技术服务企业创新绩效的影响——创新注意力的中介作用和政府补助的调节作用[J].科技进步与对策,2021,38(15):82-89.

[69]陈逸同,董正英.企业网络中心性与绩效的倒U型关系——创业导向的中介作用及环境不确定性的调节作用[J].科技管理研究,2018,38(12):192-204.

[70]姚艳虹,张翠平.知识域耦合、知识创新能力与企业创新绩效——环境不确定性和战略柔性的调节作用[J].科技进步与对策,2019,36(23):76-84.

[71]Haarhaus T., Liening A. Building dynamic capabilities to cope with environmental uncertainty: The role of strategic foresight[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2020,155:120033.

[72]张颖,顾远东,高杰.服务化与产品创新:环境不确定性的调节效应[J].科研管理, 2020,41(04):140-150.

[73]刘业鑫,吴伟伟.技术管理能力对突破性技术创新行为的影响:环境动荡性与竞争敌对性的联合调节效应[J].科技进步与对策,2021,38(07):10-18.

[74]Ahammad M. F., Basu S., Munjal S., et al. Strategic agility, environmental uncertainties and international performance: The perspective of Indian firms[J]. Journal of World Business,2021,56(4):101218.

[75]石秀,侯光明,景睿,等.企业创新活动的系统耦合效应研究[J].科研管理,2021, 42(09):52-60.

[76]韩晨,谢言,高山行.多重战略导向与企业创新绩效:一个被调节的中介效应模型[J].管理工程学报,2020,34(06):29-37.

[77]Hakala H. Strategic orientations in management literature: Three approaches to understanding the interaction between market, technology, entrepreneurial and learning orientations[J]. International Journal of Management Reviews,2011,13(2): 199-217.

[78]李颖,赵文红,杨特.创业者先前经验、战略导向与创业企业商业模式创新关系研究[J].管理学报,2021,18(07):1022-1031+1106.

[79]Slater S. F., Narver J. C. Market orientation and the learning organization[J]. Journal of Marketing, 1995,59(3):63-74.

[80]Sinkula J. M., Baker W. E., Noordewier T. A Framework for Market-Based Organizational Learning: Linking Values, Knowledge, and Behavior[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1997,25(4):305-318.

[81]Narver J. C., Slater S. F. The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability[J]. Journal of Marketing, 1990,54(4) :20-35.

[82]Ojha D., Shockley J., Acharya C. Supply chain organizational infrastructure for promoting entrepreneurial emphasis and innovativeness: The role of trust and learning[J]. International Journal of Production Economics,2016,179:212-227.

[83]Lee V. H., Ooi K. B., Chong A. Y. L., et al. Creating technological innovation via green supply chain management: An empirical analysis[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2014,41(16):6983-6994.

[84]Alshanty A. M., Emeagwali O. L. Market-sensing capability, knowledge creation and innovation: The moderating role of entrepreneurial-orientation[J]. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge,2019 (4):171–178.

[85]Abu Seman N. A., Govindan K., Mardani A., et al. The mediating effect of green innovation on the relationship between green supply chain management and environmental performance[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2019,229:115-127.

[86]Jajja M. S. S., Kannan V. R., Brah S. A., et al. Linkages between firm innovation strategy, suppliers, product innovation, and business performance: insights from resource dependence theory[J]. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 2017,37(8):1054-1075.

[87]Elkington J. Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st - century business[J]. Environmental Quality Management, 1998, 8(1): 37-51.

[88]Seth D., Shrivastava R., Shrivastava S. K., et al. An empirical investigation of critical success factors and performance measures for green manufacturing in cement industry[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management,2016,27(8):1076-1101.

[89]Pérez-Luño A., Gopalakrishnan S., Cabrera R. V. Innovation and performance：the role of environmental dynamism on the success of innovation choices[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,2014,61(3):499-510.

[90]王新成,李垣,马凤连,等.环境动态性与创新战略选择——企业创业导向和技术能力的调节作用[J].研究与发展管理,2021,33(04):111-120+182.

[91]Miller D., Friesen P. H. Strategy-Making and Environment: The Third Link[J]. Strategic Management Journal,1983,4(3):221-235.

[92]Zahra S. A., Sapienza H. J., Davidsson P. Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: A review, model and research agenda[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2006,43(4): 917-955.

[93]邓程,杨建君,刘瑞佳,耿娜娜.技术知识与新产品开发优势:战略导向的调节作用[J].科学学研究,2021,39(09):1632-1640.

[94]陈泽文,陈丹.新旧动能转换的环境不确定性背景下高管环保意识风格如何提升企业绩效——绿色创新的中介作用[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2019,40(10):113-128.

[95]Zailani S., Jeyaraman S., Vengadasan G., et al. Sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) in Malaysia: A survey[J]. International Journal Production Economics, 2012,140 (1):330-340.

[96]Zhu Q., Sarkis J., Lai K. Confirmation of a measurement model for green supply chain management practices implementation[J]. International Journal Production Economics, 2008,111(2):261-273.

[97]Yildiz Ç. S., Sezen B. Effects of green supply chain management practices on sustainability performance[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 2019,30(1): 98-121.

[98]Paulraj A. Understanding the relationships between internal resources and capabilities, sustainable supply management and organizational sustainability[J]. Journal of Supply Chain Management,2011,47(1):19-37.

[99]Tan J. J., Litschert R. J. Environment-strategy relationship and its performance implications: an empirical study of the Chinese electronics industry[J]. Strategic Management Journal,1994,15(1):1-20.

[100]Armstrong J. S., Overton T. S. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys [J]. Journal of Marketing Research,1977,14(3):396-402.

[101]周浩,龙立荣.共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法[J].心理科学进展,2004(06): 942-950.

[102]Fornell C., Larcker D. F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error[J]. Journal of Marketing Research,1981,18(1):29-50.

[103]方杰,温忠麟.基于两水平回归模型的调节效应分析及其效应量[J].心理科学进展, 2022,30(05):1183-1190.

[104]Chin W. W., Marcolin B. L., Newsted P. R. A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study[J]. Information Systems Research,2003,14(2):189-217.

[105]温忠麟,叶宝娟.中介效应分析:方法和模型发展[J].心理科学进展,2014,22(05): 731-745.

[106]温忠麟,侯杰泰,张雷.调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用[J].心理学报,2005(02): 268-274.