- 无标题文档
查看论文信息

论文中文题名:

 煤矿员工安全素养对不安全行为的影响研究    

姓名:

 崔博露    

学号:

 19202097046    

保密级别:

 公开    

论文语种:

 chi    

学科代码:

 120100    

学科名称:

 管理学 - 管理科学与工程(可授管理学、工学学位) - 管理科学与工程    

学生类型:

 硕士    

学位级别:

 管理学硕士    

学位年度:

 2022    

培养单位:

 西安科技大学    

院系:

 管理学院    

专业:

 管理科学与工程    

研究方向:

 组织心理与行为规律    

第一导师姓名:

 李文琴    

第一导师单位:

 西安科技大学    

论文提交日期:

 2022-06-16    

论文答辩日期:

 2022-06-02    

论文外文题名:

 Research on the Influence of Safety Literacy on Unsafe Behavior of Coal Mine Employees    

论文中文关键词:

 煤矿员工 ; 安全素养 ; 不安全行为 ; 感知行为控制 ; 时间压力    

论文外文关键词:

 Coal mine employees ; Safety literacy ; Unsafe behavior ; Perceptual behavior control ; Time stress    

论文中文摘要:

在国家贯彻安全理念,保障安全发展,推动安全生产的背景下,煤矿企业降低事故率、提高安全生产能力已成为大势所趋。现阶段,煤矿员工的不安全行为是我国煤矿企业安全事故产生的主要原因之一,如何有效管理员工的不安全行为是当前煤矿安全生产面临的重要和亟需解决的问题。安全素养是煤矿员工的重要内在品质,提升其安全素养可以有效防范员工的不安全行为,进而降低煤矿事故率和死亡率。因此,深入分析煤矿员工安全素养对其不安全行为的影响作用,通过提升煤矿员工的安全素养来减少员工的不安全行为,已成为煤矿企业亟需关注和解决的问题之一。

本研究通过查阅相关文献,梳理了国内外研究现状,界定了相关概念,介绍了相关理论基础,并将安全素养划分为安全知识、安全意识、安全生理和安全心理四个维度,将不安全行为分为意向性不安全行为和非意向性不安全行为两类。基于文献梳理和理论分析,提出了本研究各变量之间的关系假设,构建了以安全素养为自变量、不安全行为为因变量、感知行为控制为中介变量、时间压力为调节变量的概念模型。借鉴成熟量表设计问卷,通过预调研对初始问卷进行修订完善后,以陕西和山西两地的煤矿企业员工为对象进行问卷调查,最终回收341份有效样本数据。借助SPSS 23.0和AMOS 23.0软件对收集的数据进行描述性统计分析、相关性分析、中介效应分析和调节效应分析,对提出的假设进行了检验。研究结果表明,安全素养及其4个维度对意向性不安全行为均有显著负向影响,且影响效应从大到小依次为安全心理、安全意识、安全知识、安全生理;安全素养及其4个维度对非意向性不安全行为均有显著负向影响,且影响效应从大到小依次为安全意识、安全知识、安全心理、安全生理;感知行为控制对安全素养与意向性不安全行为的关系具有中介作用;感知行为控制对安全素养与非意向性不安全行为的关系无中介作用;时间压力对安全素养与感知行为控制的关系具有负向调节作用。

本研究不仅为煤矿员工安全素养、感知行为控制、时间压力与不安全行为之间关系的研究提供了新的理论框架,还为煤矿企业安全管理实践提供了理论依据和管理启示。

论文外文摘要:

Under the background that the country implements the safety concept, guarantees safe development, and promotes safe production, it has become the general trend in the coal mining enterprises to reduce the accident rate and improve the safety production capacity. At the present stage, the unsafe behavior of coal mine employees is one of the main reasons for the occurrence of safety accidents in coal mining enterprises in China. How to effectively manage the unsafe behavior of employees is an important and urgent problem facing the current coal mine safety production. Safety literacy is an important intrinsic quality of coal mine employees. Improving their safety literacy can effectively prevent employees from unsafe behavior, thereby reducing the accident rate and mortality rate in coal mines. Therefore, in-depth analysis of the effect of coal mine employees' safety literacy on their unsafe behaviors and the reduction of employees' unsafe behaviors by improving their safety literacy has become one of the issues that coal mine enterprises need to pay attention to and solve urgently.

This study reviewed the relevant literature, sorted out the research status at home and abroad, defined relevant concepts, and introduced the theoretical basis. This study divided safety literacy into four dimensions: safety knowledge, safety awareness, safety physiology and safety psychology; and divided behaviors into two dimensions: intentional unsafe behavior and unintentional unsafe behavior. Based on literature review and theoretical analysis, this study put forward the hypothesis of the relationship between the variables, and a conceptual model was constructed with safety literacy as the independent variable, unsafe behavior as the dependent variable, perceived behavior control as the mediating variable, and time pressure as the moderating variable. This questionnaire was designed with reference to mature scales, and the initial questionnaires was revised and improved through pre-investigation. A questionnaire survey was conducted on the employees of coal mining enterprises in Shaanxi and Shanxi, and 341 valid sample data were finally recovered. This study used the SPSS 23.0 and AMOS 23.0 software to perform descriptive statistical analysis, correlation analysis, mediation effect analysis and moderation effect, to test the proposed research hypotheses. The research results show that safety literacy and its four dimensions have a significant negative impact on intentional unsafe behavior, and the effect from large to small is safety psychology, safety awareness, safety knowledge, safety physiology; safety literacy and its four dimensions have a significant negative impact on non-intentional unsafe behavior, and the effect from large to small is safety awareness, safety knowledge, safety psychology, and safety physiology; perceived behavioral control has mediating effect on the relationship between and safety literacy and intentional unsafe behavior; perceived behavioral control has no mediating effect on the relationship between safety literacy and unintentional unsafe behavior; time pressure has a negative moderating effect on the relationship between safety literacy and perceived behavioral control.

This study not only provides a new theoretical framework for the study of the relationship between coal mine employees' safety literacy, perceived behavior control, time pressure and unsafe behavior, but also provides theoretical basis and management insights for the safety management practice of coal mine enterprises.

参考文献:

[1]Howell G A, Abdelhamid T S, Mitropoulos P. Systems model of construction accident causation[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering & Management, 2005, 131(7): 816-825.

[2]陈红. 中国煤矿重大事故中的不安全行为研究[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2006.

[3]曹庆仁. 基于安全行为的煤矿安全管理系统模型[J]. 煤矿安全, 2014, 45(4): 219-222.

[4]Fernandes A, Braarud P. Exploring measures of workload, situation awareness, and task performance in the main control room[J]. Procedia Manufacturing, 2015, 16(3): 1281-1288.

[5]Tucker C E. Social networks, personalized advertising, and privacy controls[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 2014, 51(5): 546–562.

[6]Webster J R, Beehr T A, Love K. Extending the challenge-hindrance model of occupational stress: the role of appraisal[J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2011, 79(2): 505-516.

[7]Searle B J, Auton J C. The merits of measuring challenge and hindrance appraisals[J]. Anxiety Stress Coping, 2015, 28(2): 121-143.

[8]Li X C, Li Q, Long Y Z. Research on evaluation of safety literacy based on social network analysis[J]. Process Safety Progress, 2020, 39(1): 125-134.

[9]Vallinkoski K K, Koirikivi P M. Enhancing Finnish basic education schools’ safety culture through comprehensive safety and security management[J]. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 2020, 2(6): 103-115.

[10]Gordillo A, Barra E, Lopez P S, et al. Development of teacher digital competence in the area of E-safety through educational video games[J]. Sustainability, 2021, 13(15): 84-85.

[11]Kim M S, Kwak H S, Chun M J, et al. How to improve patient safety literacy[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020, 17(19): 73-76.

[12]Grindle A C, Dickinson A M, Boettcher W. Behavioral safety research in manufacturing settings[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 2000, 20(1): 29-68.

[13]Heerman W J, Perrin E M, Yin H S, et al. Health Literacy and Injury Prevention Behaviors Among Caregivers of Infants[J]. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2014, 46(5): 449-456.

[14]Wang B, Wu C, Huang L. Data literacy for safety professionals in safety management: A theoretical perspective on basic questions and answers[J]. Safety Science, 2019, 117(3): 15-22.

[15]Kath L M, Magley V J, Marmet M. The role of organizational trust in safety climate’s influence on organizational outcomes[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2010, 42(5): 1488-1497.

[16]Idrees M, Hafeez M, Kim J Y. Workers’ age and the impact of psychological factors on the perception of safety at construction sites[J]. Sustainability, 2017, 9(5): 745-748.

[17]Vinodkumar M N, Bhasi M. Safety management practices and safety behaviour: Assessing the mediating role of safety knowledge and motivation[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2010, 42(6): 2082-2093.

[18]Smith T D, Hughes K, DeJoy D M, et al. Assessment of relationships between work stress, work-family conflict, burnout and firefighter safety behavior outcomes[J]. Safety Science, 2018, 103(3): 287-292.

[19]Nævestad T O, Phillips R O, Storkersen K V, et al. Safety culture in maritime transport in Norway and Greece: exploring national, sectorial and organizational influences on unsafe behaviours and work accidents[J]. Marine Policy, 2019, 99(2): 1-13.

[20]Jung M, Lim S, Chi S. Impact of work environment and occupational stress on safety behavior of individual construction workers[J]. Public Health, 2020, 17(22): 83-89.

[21]Rajabi F, Mokarami H, Cousins R, et al. Structural equation modeling of safety performance based on personality traits, job and organizational related factors[J]. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 2020, 103(2): 31-34.

[22]Lee J H, So S H, Min S N, Lee K S. The effects of personality types on self-reported safety behavior: Focused on plant workers in Korea[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2018, 121(3): 20-27.

[23]Sadeghi Y M, Rastegarzadeh E, Soltanzadeh A, et al. Modeling the occurrence of unsafe behaviors based on safety climate and organizational leadership style dimensions in oil platforms using the fuzzy logic approach[J]. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 2021, 34(4): 128-132.

[24]Mahnaz S, Mehdi J, Moslem A, et al. Individual cognitive factors affecting unsafe acts among Iranian industrial workers: An integrative meta-synthesis interpretive structural modeling approach[J]. Safety Science, 2019, 120(2): 89-98.

[25]Koo K E, Nurulazam M D A, Rohaida M Z S, et al. Examining the potential of safety knowledge as extension construct for theory of planned behaviour: Explaining safety practices of young adults at engineering laboratories and workshops[J]. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014, 116(3): 1513-1518.

[26]Park S, Kang J. More is not always better: Determinants of choice overload and satisfaction with customization in fast casual restaurants[J]. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 2021, 13(4): 1-21.

[27]Sijbom R B L, Anseel F, Crommrlinck M. Why seeking feedback from diverse sources may not besufficent for stimulating creativity: The role of performance dynamism and creative time pressure[J]. Journal of Organizatonal Behavior, 2017, 39(3): 1-14.

[28]贺超,宋学锋,王建军. 基于物联网的360度煤矿安全管理信息系统探讨[J]. 工业安全与环保, 2013, 39(8): 80-82.

[29]谭波,王悦,赵彤. 安全工程专业人才信息素养培养模式研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(9): 171-176.

[30]周平,裴瑞江,陈滋顶. 基于3D应急演练的铁路职工安全素质提升研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(2): 138-142.

[31]杨辰飞,陈雪波,孙秋柏. 企业员工安全意识影响因素的探索和分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2015, 25(1): 34-39.

[32]唐凯,田水承,李红霞,等. 企业安全文化培训效能路径研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2019, 19(5): 1638-1642.

[33]柯亮. 基于结构方程模型的幼儿教师安全素养内涵体系构建及测评[J]. 陕西学前师范学院学报, 2021, 37(2): 111-118.

[34]潘言,刘妍,黄子轩,等. 基于G1法与熵权法的社区居民安全素养评价模型[J]. 安全, 2022, 43(1): 59-64.

[35]王双龙. 员工的时间压力对个体双元性的影响机制研究[J]. 软科学, 2018, 32(10): 62-66.

[36]王宁,张王,周密,等. 因时而变: 时间压力视角下反馈寻求时机对创造力的影响机制研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2021, 38(23): 141-150.

[37]胡博,李开容,陈雨嘉,等. 时间压力下图标语义距离对雷达界面信息工作记忆的影响[J]. 心理科学, 2021, 44(5): 1073-1080.

[38]叶贵,越宏哲,杨晶晶,等. 建筑工人认知水平对不安全行为影响仿真研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(9): 36-42.

[39]Wang D, Wang X, Xia N. How safety‑related stress affects workers safety behavior: the moderating role of psychological capital[J]. Safety Science, 2018, 103(4): 247‑259.

[40]刘玉姣,刘剑,朱宝岩. 认知心理学视角下矿工的信息加工模型研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2015, 11(11): 161-166.

[41]杨佳丽,栗继祖,冯国瑞,等. ABC分析法在煤矿意向性不安全行为管理中的应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2016, 26(5): 140-145.

[42]安宇,王袆,李子琪,等. 基于TPB的矿工不安全行为形成机制[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(10): 20-26.

[43]程恋军,仲维清. 代际划分视角下矿工不安全行为研究[J]. 财经论丛, 2016, 25(1): 90-96.

[44]刘钰欣,栗继祖,冯国瑞. 差错管理氛围对矿工习惯性违章行为的影响机制研究[J]. 煤矿安全, 2018, 49(8): 289-292.

[45]曹庆仁,李凯,李静林. 管理者行为对矿工不安全行为的影响关系研究[J]. 管理科学, 2011, 24(6): 69-78.

[46]王霞. 心理资本对员工不安全行为的影响——基于犬儒主义的中介作用[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2019, 15(9): 116-120.

[47]刘超,罗云,仝世渝,等. 基于层次分析法的电力企业员工安全素质测评指标体系研究[J].中国安全科学学报, 2009, 19(9): 132-138.

[48]刘阳阳,刘何清,何昌富. 基于多级物元分析的企业职工安全素质评价研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2012, 8(12): 184-189.

[49]王路宽,徐敏,李静,等. 公民基本安全素养指数的分析与构造[J]. 安全, 2016, 37(2): 34-37.

[50]马艳春. 国有煤矿从业人员安全素质与安全能力[J]. 煤矿安全, 2010, 41(9): 157-160.

[51]曹琦. 人的不安全行为分析及治理[J]. 人类工效学, 1998, 12(4): 36-38.

[52]孙林岩. 人因工程[M]. 北京: 中国科学技术出版社, 2001.

[53]陈红,祁慧,谭慧. 基于特征源与环境特征的中国煤矿重大事故研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2005, 15(9): 33-38.

[54]周刚,程卫民. 人因失误与人不安全行为相关原理的分析与探讨[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2008, 18(3): 10-14.

[55]Reason J. Human Error[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge university press, 1990.

[56]曹庆仁. 浅析煤矿员工不安全行为的影响因素[J]. 矿业安全与环保, 2007, 33(6): 80-82.

[57]孙勇,钟卓玲,李璐. 基于班组安全氛围的建筑工人不安全行为预测[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2019, 15(8): 156-161.

[58]李乃文,牛莉霞. 矿工工作倦怠、不安全心理与不安全行为的结构模型[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2010, 24(3): 236-240.

[59]Burger J M. Desire for control and the illusion of control: The effects of familiarity and sequence of outcomes[J]. Journal of Research in Personality, 1986, 20(1): 66-76.

[60]Skinner E A. A guide to constructs of control[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1996, 71(3): 549-570.

[61]Rotter J B. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement[J]. Psychological Monographs, 1966, 80(1): 1-28.

[62]Sarah E. Predicting substance abuse treatment completion using a new scale based on the theory of planned behavior[J]. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 2015, 46(2): 174-182.

[63]Blair K. The moderated influence of internal control: An examination across health-related behaviors[J]. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2003, 13(4): 377-386.

[64]Naman S, Shankar P, Pradip S. Impact of culture, behavior and gender on green purchase intention[J]. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2018, 41(3): 177-189.

[65]Drach Z A, Freund A. Team effectiveness under stress: A structural contingency approach[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2007, 28(4): 423-450.

[66]Guinote A, Brown M, Fiske S T. Minority status decreases of control and increase interpretive processing[J]. Social Cognition, 2006, 24(2): 169-186.

[67]季忠洋,李北伟,朱婧祎,等. 情感体验和感知控制双重视角下社交媒体用户倦怠行为机理研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2019, 42(4): 129-135.

[68]Ohly S, Fritz C. Work characteristics, challenge appraisal, creativity, and proactive behavior: A multi-level study[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2010, 31(4): 543-565.

[69]Cavanaugh M A, Boswell W R, Roehling M V, et al. An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among US managers[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2000, 85(1): 65-74.

[70]Szollos A. Toward a psychology of chronic time pressure: Conceptual and methodological review[J]. Time Society, 2009, 18(2): 332-350.

[71]Chong D, Eerde W V, Chai K H, et al. A double-edged sword: the effects of challenge and hindrance time pressure on new product development teams[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2011, 58(1): 71-86.

[72]Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991, 50(2): 179-211.

[73]Shukri M, Jones F, Conner M. Theory of planned behaviour, psychological stressors and intention to avoid violating traffic rules: A multi-level modelling analysis[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2022, 169(3): 624-635.

[74]Mitchell G T R. Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1992, 17(2): 183-211.

[75]张晓娟,李贞贞. 基于社会认知理论的智能手机用户信息安全行为意愿研究[J]. 现代情报, 2017, 37(9): 16-22.

[76]王国猛,张梦思,赵曙明,等. 个性化契约与核心员工亲组织不道德行为: 社会认知理论的视角[J]. 管理工程学报, 2020, 34(4): 44-51.

[77]杨振宏,李盼,王文杰. 基于社会认知理论的事故体验对矿工不安全行为影响研究[J].安全与环境学报, 2021, 21(4): 1607-1614.

[78]Baumeister R F, Bratslavsky E, Muraven M, et al. Ego depletion:Is the active self a limited resource[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, 74(2): 1252-1265.

[79]Fischer P, Greitemeyer T, Frey D. Ego depletion and positive illusions: Does the construction of positivity require regulatory resources[J]. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2007, 33(2): 1306-1321.

[80]张亚军,张军伟,崔利刚,等. 组织政治知觉对员工绩效的影响:自我损耗理论的视角[J].管理评论, 2018, 30(1): 78-88.

[81]李锡元,张秋,王红梅. 创新时间压力与知识隐藏相关机制研究[J]. 华东经济管理, 2021, 35(2): 57-64.

[82]王丹,秦云云,张瑞雪. 高危行业企业员工不安全行为传播的影响因素本土化研究[J]. 建筑经济, 2020, 41(S2): 295-299.

[83]Hussain N, Kadir M M, Nafees A A, et al. Needs assessment regarding occupational health and safety interventions among textile workers: a qualitative case study in Karachi, Pakistan[J]. Community Health Science, 2019, 8(1): 87-93.

[84]钟茂华,田向亮,刘畅,等. 基于结构方程模型的地铁乘客安全行为影响因素分析[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2018, 14(1): 5-11.

[85]Della R H , Lirn T C , Shang K C. The study of safety behavior in ferry transport[J]. Safety Science, 2020, 131(3): 104-115.

[86]Shin M, Lee H S, Park M, et al. A system dynamics approach for modeling construction workers safety attitudes and behaviors[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2014, 68(2): 95-105.

[87]Saedi A M, Majid A A, Isa Z. Relationships between safety climate and safety participation in the petroleum industry: A structural equation modeling approach-Science Direct[J]. Safety Science, 2020, 121(4): 240-248.

[88]曹璐璐,刘艳. 有限空间作业人员不安全心理及行为量表研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(11): 37-42.

[89]范中洲,王宁飞. 基于SEM的船员不安全行为研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2021, 21(2): 682-687.

[90]黄浪,吴超,王秉. 基于信息认知的个人行为安全机理及其影响因素[J]. 情报杂志, 2018, 37(8): 121-127.

[91]孙先洪. 高校教师计算机自我效能感与计算机态度的实证研究[J]. 江苏高教, 2017, 15(5): 64-66.

[92]Guerrero S, Challiol J H. Idiosyncratic deals and helping behavior: The moderating role of I-deal opportunity for Co-workers[J]. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2016, 31(3): 433-443.

[93]Cristea M, Gheorghiu A. Attitude, perceived behavioral control, and intention to adopt risky behaviors[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2016, 43(2): 157-165.

[94]Jik K B, Koo J W, Gil J S. A Mediating Effect of Job Stress Between Physical Environmental Risk and Safety Behavior, and Moderating Effect of Perceived Control[J]. Journal of the Korean Society of Safety. 2017, 32(2): 105-111.

[95]Atasoy O, Morewedge C K. Digital goods are valued less than physical goods[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2018, 44(6): 1343-1357.

[96]杨秀秀,胡惠闵. 个体特征和工作环境对教研员工作投入的影响: 自我效能感的中介作用[J]. 全球教育展望, 2021, 50(8): 116-128.

[97]陆昌勤,凌文辁,方俐洛. 管理自我效能感与管理者工作态度和绩效的关系[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 42(2): 276-280.

[98]Yu X B, Mehmood K, Paulsen N, et al. Why Safety Knowledge Cannot be Transferred Directly to Expected Safety Outcomes in Construction Workers: The Moderating Effect of Physiological Perceived Control and Mediating Effect of Safety Behavior[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2021, 147(1): 105-118.

[99]雷婷,杨乃定. 突发事件中时间压力和情绪调节对框架效应的影响[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2016, 26(10): 163-168.

[100]Morf M C, Feierabend A, Staffelbach B. Task variety and counterproductive work behavior[J]. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 2017, 13(1): 6-8.

[101]Kustubayeva A, Matthews G, Panganiban A R. Emotion and information search in tactical decision-making: Moderator effects of feedback[J]. Motivation and Emotion, 2012, 36(4): 529-543.

[102]徐选华,马志鹏,陈晓红. 大群体冲突、风险感知与应急决策质量的关系研究: 决策犹豫度的调节作用[J]. 管理工程学报, 2020, 34(6): 90-99.

[103]陈世平,张琳,王晓庄. 组织危机沟通回应策略对员工情绪和行为的影响[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2017, 15(3): 379-384.

[104]Vinodkumar M N, Bhasi M. Safety management practices and safety behavior: Assessing the mediating role of safety knowledge and motivation[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2010, 42(6): 2082-2093.

[105]马振鹏,俞秀宝,吴宗法,等. 安全知识对安全绩效的影响机制研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2016, 26(7): 141-146.

[106]Barling J, Loughing C, Kelloway E K. Development and test of a model linking safety-specific transformation leadership and occupational safety[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2002, 87(3): 488-496.

[107]李乃文,姜秋敏. 矿工不安全心理的结构和测量[J]. 心理学探新, 2010, 30(3): 91-96.

[108]佟瑞鹏,陈策. 煤矿组织安全行为对个体不安全行为的作用机理研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术, 2015, 11(12): 40-45.

[109]赵泓超,黄欣,田水承. 基于生理特性与人格因素测评的矿工不安全行为研究[J]. 技术与创新管理, 2016, 37(4): 386-391.

[110]郑莹. 煤矿员工不安全行为的心理因素分析及对策研究[D]. 河北理工大学, 2008.

[111]梁振东. 组织及环境因素对员工不安全行为影响的SEM研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2012, 22(11): 16-22.

[112]Sherer M, Maddux J E, Mercandante B, et al. The self-efficacy scale: construction and validation[J]. Psychological Reports, 1982, 51(2): 663-671.

[113]Taylor S D, Bagozzi R P, Gaither C A. Decision making and effort in the self-regulation of hypertension: Testing two competing theories[J]. Health Psychol, 2005, 10(4): 505-530.

[114]Semmer N, Zapf S D, Dunckel H. Assessing stress at work: a framework and an instrument[J]. Psychologisches Institut, 1995, 49(2): 105-113.

[115]Podsakoff P M, Organ D W. Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects[J]. Journal of Management, 1986, 12(4): 531-544.

[116]Mackinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Williams J. Confidence limits for the indirect effect: distribution of the product and resampling methods[J]. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2004, 39(1): 99-128.

[117]刘铁忠,李志祥. 知识视角下的企业安全管理能力增长研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2009, 26(13): 65-67.

[118]黄钢. 从提高“注意力”入手, 培养员工健康的安全心理[J]. 工业安全与环保, 2010, 36(12): 63-64.

[119]Yam K C, Fehr R, Keng F T, et al. Out of control: A self-control perspective on the link between surface acting and abusive supervision[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2016, 101(2): 292-301.

中图分类号:

 TD79    

开放日期:

 2022-06-16    

无标题文档

   建议浏览器: 谷歌 火狐 360请用极速模式,双核浏览器请用极速模式