在全球自然、人为灾害频发背景下，许多城市面临环境污染、交通堵塞等不同程度的问题。其中，城市协调发展问题尤为突出，对我国的城市和经济发展产生了巨大影响，城市内部的协调发展已成为制约城市发展的现实挑战之一。城市韧性与产业结构相互作用、相互制约，并非孤立存在，而是共同推动城市化水平的提升。通过对城市韧性和产业结构水平进行测度，并探究它们之间的耦合协调水平及其在空间上的分布情况，可为城市进一步发展提供有价值的参考依据。

本文分别构建了城市韧性与产业结构评价指标体系，基于2011—2021年中国30个省份（直辖市、自治区）的面板数据，运用熵值法分别测度了各个省份的城市韧性、产业结构发展水平；构建耦合协调模型进一步测算各个省份城市韧性与产业结构的耦合协调发展水平；借助障碍因子模型测算各个地区发展的障碍因子。

研究结果表明：（1）在研究期间内，城市韧性与产业结构水平均呈稳步增长的态势，其中在2020年初次面对新冠疫情的干扰，产业结构发展受到不同程度的影响，但全国整体情况良好。（2）城市韧性与产业结构耦合度较高，耦合协调度均值经历了“濒临失调—勉强协调—初级协调”的阶段提升，在空间上呈“东部沿海地区至西部逐渐减弱，南方地区至北方逐渐减弱”的分布格局，且在研究期间有40%的省份退出了勉强协调这一阶段，成效显著。（3）城市韧性与产业结构耦合协调水平在空间上存在集聚现象，但呈不均衡分布，东部地区出现高—高集聚，发展态势较好，而西部地区出现低—低集聚，发展较为缓慢。（4）阻碍城市韧性与产业结构耦合协调发展的准则层的障碍因子主要有就业结构、基础设施韧性与产值结构，阻碍城市韧性与产业结构耦合协调发展的指标层的障碍因子主要有第二产业就业占比、第三产业增加值与第二产业增加值的比值、第三产业所占比重、排水管道长度、城市全年供水量。基于研究结果，提出相应的政策建议。

Against the backdrop of frequent natural and man-made disasters around the world, many cities are facing problems of varying degrees of severity, such as environmental pollution and traffic congestion. Among them, the problem of coordinated urban development is particularly prominent, which has had a great impact on China's urban and economic development, and the coordinated development within cities has become one of the real challenges constraining urban development. Urban resilience and industrial structure interact and constrain each other, do not exist in isolation, but jointly promote the level of urbanization. By measuring the level of urban resilience and industrial structure and exploring the level of coupled coordination between them and their spatial distribution, it can provide a valuable reference basis for further urban development.

In this paper, the evaluation index system of urban toughness and industrial structure is constructed respectively, and based on the panel data of 30 provinces (municipalities directly under the central government and autonomous regions) in China from 2011 to 2021, the entropy method is applied to measure the development level of urban toughness and industrial structure of each province; the coupling coordination model is constructed to further measure the coupling coordination between urban toughness and industrial structure of each province; the obstacle factors of development of each region are measured by the obstacle factor model; the obstacle factors of development of each region are measured by the obstacle factor model. The coupled coordination model is constructed to further measure the coupled coordination between urban toughness and industrial structure of each province; the obstacle factors of each region are measured with the help of the obstacle factor model.

The results of the study show that: (1) the level of urban resilience and industrial structure have shown a steady growth during the study period, in which the development of industrial structure has been affected to varying degrees in the face of the interference of the Xinguancun epidemic for the first time in the year 2020, but the overall situation of the whole country is good. (2) The degree of coupling between urban resilience and industrial structure is high, and the average value of the coupling coordination degree has gone through the stage of “on the verge of dysfunction-barely coordinated-primary coordinated”, and spatially it shows the following pattern: “gradually weakening from the eastern coastal area to the west, gradually weakening from the southern area to the north, and gradually weakening from the southern area to the north”. The distribution pattern of “gradually weakening from the eastern coastal region to the west, and from the southern region to the north”, and 40% of the provinces exited the stage of barely coordinated during the study period, which is effective. (3) There is a spatial clustering phenomenon in the level of coordination of urban resilience and industrial structure coupling, but it is unevenly distributed, with the eastern region experiencing high agglomeration and better development, and the western region experiencing low agglomeration and slower development. (4) The obstacle factors at the criterion level that hinder the coupled and coordinated development of urban resilience and industrial structure are mainly employment structure, infrastructure resilience and output value structure, and the obstacle factors at the indicator level that hinder the coupled and coordinated development of urban resilience and industrial structure are mainly the proportion of employment in the secondary industry, the ratio of the added value of the tertiary industry to the added value of the secondary industry, the proportion of the tertiary industry, the length of the drainage pipeline, and the amount of urban water supply for the whole year. Based on the research results, corresponding policy recommendations are proposed.

[1] 白立敏. 基于景观格局视角的长春市城市生态韧性评价与优化研究[D]. 东北师范大学, 2019.

[2] 刘志敏. 社会生态视角的城市韧性研究[D]. 东北师范大学, 2019.

[3] Klein R J T, Nicholls R J, Thomalla F. Resilience to natural hazards: How useful is this concept?[J]. Environmental Hazards, 2003, 5(1): 35–45.

[4] Holling C S. Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems[J]. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematic, 1973, 4: 1-23.

[5] Hill E, Wial H, Wolman H. Exploring regional economic resilience[R].Institute of Urban and Regional Development (IURD), University of California, Berkeley, CA, 2008.

[6] Brown A, Dayal A, Rumbaitis Del Rio C. From practice to theory: emerging lessons from Asia for building urban climate change resilience[J]. Environment and Urbanization, 2012, 24(2): 531–556.

[7] Suárez M, Gómez-Baggethun E, Benayas J, et al. Towards an Urban Resilience Index: A Case Study in 50 Spanish Cities[J]. Sustainability, 2016, 8(8): 774.

[8] Prasad N, Ranghieri F, Shah F, et al. Climate Resilient Cities: A Primer on Reducing Vulnerabilities to Disasters[M]. The World Bank, 2008.

[9] Joerin J, Shaw R, Krishnamurthy R R. Community, Environment and Disaster Risk Management[A]. 2014.

[10] Du T L T, Bui D D, Buurman J, et al. Towards adaptive governance for urban drought resilience: the case of Da Nang, Vietnam[J]. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 2018, 34(4): 597–615.

[11] Herrmann‐Lunecke M G, Villagra P. Community resilience and urban planning in tsunami‐prone settlements in Chile[J]. Disasters, 2020, 44(1): 103–124.

[12] Hemmati M, Ellingwood B R, Mahmoud H N. The Role of Urban Growth in Resilience of Communities Under Flood Risk[J]. Earth’s Future, 2020, 8(3).

[13] Shan S. Social media-based urban disaster recovery and resilience analysis of the Henan deluge[J]. Natural Hazards, 2023, 118(1): 377–405.

[14] Zhai W, Hu WY, Yuan ZH, et al. Examining disaster resilience perception of social media users during the billion-dollar hurricanes [J]. Natural Hazards, 2024, 120(1): 701–727.

[15] Kim NY, Chung JB. Disaster Resilience of Korean Cities Using Data Envelopment Analysis[J]. Natural Hazards Review, 2024, 25(2).

[16] Feofilovs M, Romagnoli F. Dynamic assessment of urban resilience to natural hazards[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2021, 62: 102328.

[17] Moraci F, Errigo M, Fazia C, et al. Making Less Vulnerable Cities: Resilience as a New Paradigm of Smart Planning[J]. Sustainability, 2018, 10(3): 755.

[18] Sharma M, Sharma B, Kumar N, et al. Establishing Conceptual Components for Urban Resilience: Taking Clues from Urbanization through a Planner’s Lens[J]. Natural Hazards Review, 2023, 24(1): 04022040.

[19] Fischer K, Hiermaier S, Riedel W, et al. Morphology Dependent Assessment of Resilience for Urban Areas[J]. Sustainability, 2018, 10(6): 1800.

[20] Sajjad M, Chan J C L, Chopra S S. Rethinking disaster resilience in high-density cities: Towards an urban resilience knowledge system[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2021, 69: 102850.

[21] Tang D, Li J, Zhao Z, et al. The influence of industrial structure transformation on urban resilience based on 110 prefecture-level cities in the Yangtze River[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2023, 96: 104621.

[22] He W, Zheng S, Zhao X. Exploring the spatiotemporal changes and influencing factors of urban resilience based on Scale-Density-Morphology—A case study of the Chengdu-Deyang-Mianyang Economic Belt, China[J]. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2023, 11: 1042264.

[23] Olsson E, Kerselaers E, Søderkvist Kristensen L, et al. Peri-Urban Food Production and Its Relation to Urban Resilience[J]. Sustainability, 2016, 8(12): 1340.

[24] Joyce J, Chang N-B, Harji R, et al. Coupling infrastructure resilience and flood risk assessment via copulas analyses for a coastal green-grey-blue drainage system under extreme weather events[J]. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2018, 100: 82–103.

[25] Li Y, Kappas M, Li Y. Exploring the coastal urban resilience and transformation of coupled human-environment systems[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 195: 1505–1511.

[26] Xu X, Wang M, Wang M, et al. The Coupling Coordination Degree of Economic, Social and Ecological Resilience of Urban Agglomerations in China[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022, 20(1): 413.

[27] Liu N, Wang S, Su F, et al. Research on Coupling Coordination of China’s New-Type Urbanization and Urban Resilience—Taking Yangtze River Economic Belt as an Example[J]. Sustainability, 2022, 15(1): 456.

[28] Fotopoulos G, Kallioras D, Petrakos G. Spatial variations of Greek manufacturing employment growth: The effects of specialization and international trade*: Spatial variations of Greek manufacturing employment growth[J]. Papers in Regional Science, 2010, 89(1): 109–133.

[29] Drucker J. Regional Industrial Structure Concentration in the United States: Trends and Implications: ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY[J]. Economic Geography, 2011, 87(4): 421–452.

[30] Simonen J, Svento R, Juutinen A. Specialization and diversity as drivers of economic growth: Evidence from High-Tech industries: Specialization and diversity as drivers of economic growth[J]. Papers in Regional Science, 2015, 94(2): 229–247.

[31] Karray Z, Driss S. Regional Growth in Tunisia: Economic Geography Forces and Industrial Structure[J]. Economic Research Forum, Working Papers, 2008.

[32] Wu N, Liu Z. Higher education development, technological innovation and industrial structure upgrade[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2021, 162: 120400.

[33] Zhu R, Jiang J, Cong Y, et al. Does servitization of industrial structure adversely affect the quality of economic development? Evidence from China[J]. Heliyon, 2023, 9(1): e12841.

[34] Hu H, Chen Y, Li W. The green economic impact of a green comprehensive industry agglomeration: An example from the sports industry[J]. Heliyon, 2023, 9(12): e22707.

[35] 李正兆, 傅大放, 王君娴, 等. 应对内涝灾害的城市韧性评估模型及应用[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 62(2): 266–276.

[36] 杜金莹, 唐晓春, 徐建刚. 热带气旋灾害影响下的城市韧性提升紧迫度评估研究——以珠江三角洲地区的城市为例[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2020, 29(5): 88–98.

[37] 臧鑫宇, 王逸轩, 王峤. 应对典型灾害的城市适灾韧性评价与韧性地图划定[J]. 建筑学报, 2021(S1): 146–150.

[38] 陈长坤, 陈以琴, 施波, 等. 雨洪灾害情境下城市韧性评估模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(04): 1–6.

[39] 翟国方. 气候变化背景下规划视角的城市雨洪灾害韧性应对：关键概念、基本思路和通用框架[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2024(1): 29–37.

[40] 蒋应红, 沈雷洪. 疫情与灾害叠加下的城市韧性健康开放空间规划策略研究[J]. 上海城市规划, 2021(02): 76–81.

[41] 胡雨晨, 张梦琳, 毛义华, 等. 基于多灾害的城市韧性评估及应用研究[J]. 城市发展研究, 2024, 31(2): 35–43.

[42] 夏楚瑜, 董照樱子, 陈彬. 城市生态韧性时空变化及情景模拟研究——以杭州市为例[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(1): 116–126.

[43] 陈韶清, 夏安桃. 快速城镇化区域城市韧性时空演变及障碍因子诊断——以长江中游城市群为例[J]. 现代城市研究, 2020(1): 37-44+103.

[44] 刘彦平. 城市韧性系统发展测度——基于中国288个城市的实证研究[J]. 城市发展研究, 2021, 28(6): 93–100.

[45] 谭日辉, 陈思懿, 王涛. 数字平台优化韧性城市建设研究——以北京城市副中心为例[J]. 城市问题, 2022(01): 86–94.

[46] 宋宗宇, 李南枢. 基于复合空间视角的超大城市韧性建设路径思考[J]. 北京行政学院学报, 2021(06): 49–57.

[47] 朱正威, 郭瑞莲, 袁玲. 新安全格局背景下城市安全韧性评价框架：探索与构建[J]. 公共管理与政策评论, 2024, 13(3): 138–151.

[48] 李娜, 张广来, 张宁. 中国城市韧性水平综合评价及区域异质性分析[J]. 统计与决策, 2023, 39(19): 117–120.

[49] 白帅, 吴金华, 王祯. 河南省城市韧性与土地利用效率的耦合协调性[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022, 42(1): 308–316.

[50] 和佳慧, 吴映梅, 李婵. 城市韧性与科技创新耦合协调发展研究——以成渝地区双城经济圈为例[J]. 资源开发与市场, 2022, 38(1): 46–52.

[51] 周倩, 刘德林. 长三角城市群城市韧性与城镇化水平耦合协调发展研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2020, 27(4): 286–292.

[52] 罗巍, 黄志华, 程遂营, 等. 黄河流域城市韧性与经济发展水平协调性研究[J]. 人民黄河, 2022, 44(07): 8–13.

[53] 毛丽娟,夏杰长,刘睿仪.数字技术与城市韧性耦合——基于我国285个城市的实证分析[J].河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2024,26(02):95-106.

[54] 贺嘉霖,王敏,王大树,等.大运河沿线地区城市韧性与科技创新耦合协调机制[J].地域研究与开发,2024,43(01):53-60.

[55] 张慧, 易金彪. 经济高质量发展与城市韧性的耦合关系及时空演变分析——以中国十大城市群为例[J]. 西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2023, 44(10): 110–121.

[56] 刘璇, 李长英. 产业结构变迁、互联网发展与全要素生产率提升[J]. 经济问题探索, 2022(07): 124–138.

[57] 杨文捷, 蒋晓阳, 朱顺和. 产业结构、宏观经济不稳定性与经济增长[J]. 统计与决策, 2022, 38(10): 112–115.

[58] 黄寰, 黄辉, 肖义, 等. 产业结构升级、政府生态环境注意力与绿色创新效率——基于中国115个资源型城市的证据[J]. 自然资源学报, 2024, 39(1): 104–124.

[59] 孙勇, 张思慧, 赵腾宇, 等. 数字技术创新对产业结构升级的影响及其空间效应——以长江经济带为例[J]. 软科学,2022,36(10):9-16.

[60] 王勇, 张耀辉. 创业水平对产业结构升级的影响[J]. 经济问题, 2022(02): 69–78.

[61] 冯素玲, 许德慧. 数字产业化对产业结构升级的影响机制分析——基于2010—2019年中国省际面板数据的实证分析[J]. 东岳论丛, 2022, 43(01): 136-149+192.

[62] 李涛, 李芸萌. 人口流动、城市集群发展与产业结构优化——基于吉林省实践路径的考察[J]. 税务与经济, 2024(3): 106–112.

[63] 李健. 数字经济、要素市场化与产业结构转型升级[J]. 统计与信息论坛, 2024, 39(5): 31–44.

[64] 熊兴, 余兴厚, 汪亚美. 成渝地区双城经济圈新型城镇化与产业结构升级互动关系研究[J]. 经济体制改革, 2022(2): 42–49.

[65] 张明斗, 翁爱华. 东北地区产业结构优化与城市土地集约利用协调性[J]. 自然资源学报, 2022, 37(3): 734–752.

[66] 张竣喃, 逯进, 周惠民. 技术创新、产业结构与金融发展的耦合效应研究——基于中国省域数据的实证分析[J]. 管理评论, 2020, 32(11): 112–127.

[67] 刘七军, 那静文, 李昭楠, 等. “一带一路”省域绿色金融与产业结构耦合协调发展时空分异[J]. 生态经济, 2022, 38(10): 62–69.

[68] 赵建吉, 王艳华, 张洁, 等. 中部地区人口结构与产业结构的时空耦合[J]. 经济地理, 2019, 39(12): 129–137.

[69] 师应来,赵一帆,肖烯岚.产业结构升级、科技创新与经济高质量发展的耦合协调研究[J].统计与决策,2024,40(01):119-124.

[70] 张佩,孙勇.新基建与产业升级耦合协调发展的空间格局及影响因素[J].长江流域资源与环境,2023,32(03):464-477.

[71] 徐圆, 邓胡艳. 多样化、创新能力与城市经济韧性[J]. 经济学动态, 2020(8): 88–104.

[72] 彭荣熙, 刘涛, 曹广忠. 中国东部沿海地区城市经济韧性的空间差异及其产业结构解释[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(6): 1732–1748.

[73] 刘成昆, 李欣然. 突发公共卫生事件下产业结构多元化对城市韧性的影响分析——以粤港澳大湾区为例[J]. 贵州社会科学, 2021(1): 116–125.

[74] Alberti M, Marzluuff J M, Shulenberger E, et al. Integrating humans into ecology: Opportunities and challenges for studying urban ecosystems[J]. BioScience,2003,53(12):1169-79.

[75] Campanella T J. Urban resilience and the recovery of new orleans[J]. Journal of the American planning association,2006,72(2):141-6.

[76] Hamilton W. Resilience and the city: The water sector[J].Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Urban Design Planning,2009,162(3):109-21.

[77] Ahern J. From fail-safe to safe-to-fail: Sustainability and resilience in the new urban world[J].Landscape urban Planning,2011,100(4):341-3.

[78] Boschma R. Towards an evolutionary perspective on regional resilience[J].Regional Studies,2015,49(5):733-51.

[79] Santos J, Yip C, Thekdi S, et al. Workforce/population, economy, infrastructure, geography, hierarchy, and time (weight): Reflections on the plural dimensions of disaster resilience[J].Risk analysis,2020,40(1):43-67.

[80] Amegavi G B, Nursey-Bray M, Suh J. Exploring the realities of urban resilience: Practitioners’ perspectives[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2024, 103: 104313.

[81] 司愉佳. 甘肃省产业结构调整优化路径研究[D].兰州财经大学,2023.

[82] 苏东水. 产业经济学[Z].高等教育出版社,2010.

[83] 朱丽娜（Juliana Forero）. 基于社会文化可持续性的城市历史文化遗产保护研究[D].华中科技大学,2013.

[84] 世界资源研究所，联合国环境规划署，联合国开发计划署.世界资源报告1992-1993[M].中国环境科学出版社,1993.

[85] 张明斗, 冯晓青. 长三角城市群内各城市的城市韧性与经济发展水平的协调性对比研究[J]. 城市发展研究, 2019, 26(01): 82–91.

[86] 程皓, 阳国亮, 纪晓君. 中国十大城市群城市韧性与环境压力脱钩关系研究[J]. 统计与决策, 2019, 35(07): 79–83.

[87] 张卫国, 黄晓兰, 郑月龙, 等. 包容性城镇化与产业结构的协调发展评价[J]. 经济与管理研究, 2016, 37(2): 28–34.

[88] 范凯歌.中国城市韧性的区域差异及影响因素研究[D].兰州大学,2022.

[89] 冯晓青.城市韧性的空间格局特征及作用因素研究[D].东北财经大学,2019.

[90] 刘成杰,苏虹,高兴波等.数字经济发展与城市韧性提升——水平测度和影响机制分析[J].城市问题,2023,(11):94-103.

[91] 应超,李加林,刘永超等.东海海岸带县域城市韧性演化及影响因素[J].地理学报,2024,79(02):462-483.

[92] 高运龙. 黑龙江省产业结构优化问题研究[J]. 中国市场, 2021(22): 45–46.

[93] 韩文艳, 熊永兰. 科技大国创新驱动产业结构优化的比较研究[J]. 科技管理研究, 2020, 40(11): 1–8.

[94] 王鹏飞, 李红波. 基于产业结构关联视角的区域经济韧性作用机理研究——以江苏省为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2022, 41(2): 224–238.

[95] 陈奕玮, 吴维库. 产业集聚、产业多样化与城市经济韧性关系研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2021, 38(18): 64–73.

[96] 张振, 赵儒煜, 杨守云. 东北地区产业结构对区域经济韧性的空间溢出效应研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2020, 37(5): 37–46.

[97] 胡晓辉. 区域经济弹性研究述评及未来展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2012, 34(8): 64–72.

[98] 马海涛,张雪莹,梁源钊,等.东北地区黑土保护与区域发展综合评价及耦合协调研究[J].地理科学,2023,43(12):2183-2195.

[99] 方大春, 张凡. 人口结构与产业结构耦合协调关系研究[J]. 当代经济管理, 2016, 38(09): 54–60.

[100] 傅国华, 马恺阳, 张德生. 构建现代产业体系背景下海南自贸港产业结构优化研究[J]. 海南大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2022, 40(2): 92–100.

[101] 包思勤. “双碳”背景下内蒙古产业结构战略性调整思路探讨[J]. 内蒙古社会科学, 2021, 42(5): 199–206.