党的第十五次代表大会确立“依法治国，建设社会主义法治国家”方略以来，我国法治建设取得长足发展，制定出大量顺应时代经济社会发展的法律，制度化的法治已在我国基本建立，满足了“有法可依”的需求；普法计划的推进，使得社会主义法律为更多公民所了解。 由于法治并非我国固有的传统，法治思想从国外移植到中国的效果也并不尽如人意，在现实生活中依然有很多与法治格格不入的现象存在，尤其是公民对待诉讼的态度，突出体现了公民法律意识中存在的问题。本文将观察到的几种现象分成三类进行论述。第一，公民对法律普通存在的冷漠、厌恶、规避心理。第二，行政权力对司法的干涉，以权压法、人情代法。第三，法律权威不足、执法不严，普通存在拒不执行法院判决的现象。 我国历史文化悠久而连续不断，分析当前许多社会现象产生的原因都摆脱不了五千年的历史文化。就以上归纳的三种现象，本文从历史和时代两方面分析原因。首先，历史原因。从四个角度出发：政治、经济、文化及法律起源。政治方面，行政司法合一历史格局导致行政司法不分、以权压法；经济方面，以小农经济为主的农业文明孕育的固态、单调人际关系，产生的纠纷很少，对法律及诉讼的需求也大大减少；法律起源，刑起于兵，导致重刑轻民的法律体系、用刑罚贯彻民事、刑事纠纷的解决中，使普通公民对法律产生恐惧和排斥情绪；文化原因，宗族礼法制度，轻法治，强调等级序列，尊崇权力。其次，时代原因。从法律权威不足、司法和执法部门在法律运行中的不公正及法院判决执行的不力等方面阐述以上三个原因对公民法律意识产生的冲击。 在分析原因的基础上，文章有针对性的提出四个解决途径。一，转变普法重点，重视法精神和主体意识的培养 ；二，改良司法机构设置，强化完善审判系统的独立性；三，经济领域的变革是完善法律意识的基础；四，建立法律信仰 。 文章在阐述现象和分析原因过程中，采用了文献法、对比法、理论联系实际的方法，在大量阅读和吸收前人论述的基础上，对比古、今及中、外公民法律意识现象，对当代我国公民诉讼中法律意识的问题，分析原因，提出对策。

Fifteenth Congress of the Party to establish "rule of law and building a socialist country ruled by law" strategy, China's legal construction has made great progress, and work out a lot of the times the laws of economic and social development and institutionalization of the rule of law has been basically established in China, to meet the "legal basis" of the demand; the promotion of legal literacy programs, making the citizens of the socialist legal for more understanding. Because of the inherent tradition of the rule of law not the rule of law ideology transplanted from abroad to China's effect is not satisfactory, in real life, there are still alien to many of the phenomenon of the existence and rule of law, in particular the attitude of citizens towards litigation, highlights the citizens Problems in the legal sense. This phenomenon will be observed in several divided into three categories were discussed. First, the existing common law citizen apathy, disgust, aversion. Second, the administrative power of judicial intervention to the right pressure method, favors on behalf of the law. Third, the lack of legal authority, lax enforcement, the general existence of the phenomenon of refusing to implement court decisions. China's long and continuous history and culture, analysis of the current causes of many social phenomena are not out of five thousand years of history and culture. Summarize the above three phenomena, this paper analyzes the history and the era of two reasons. First, the historical perspective from four aspects: political, economic, cultural and legal origin. Political, administrative and judicial unity led to the administration of justice, regardless of historical patterns, to the right pressure method; the economy, to small-scale peasant-based agricultural civilization gave birth to the solid, monotone relationships, few disputes arise, the law and litigation significantly reduce demand; legal origin, punishment from the military, resulting in the legal system of the public light felony, with penalties for carrying out civil and criminal disputes, so that ordinary citizens fear and resentment law; cultural reasons, the clan system of etiquette , light the rule of law, emphasizing the hierarchical order, respected power. In addition, lack of legal authority, judicial and law enforcement operation in the law unjust and ineffective implementation of court decisions and other times because of legal awareness of citizens also have a great impact. Based on the analysis of the reasons, the article to focus on the four solutions. First, the change in legal literacy focus, the main emphasis on law and the spirit of Consciousness; Second, the improvement of the judiciary to set, and strengthen the independence of the justice system improved; Third, changes in the economic field is to improve the legal awareness of the foundation; Fourth, the establishment of legal beliefs. The paper describes the process of the phenomenon and analyze the causes, using literature, comparative method, theory with practice in reading and absorbing a lot of discussion on the basis of previous contrast the ancient, now and in the legal sense of the phenomenon of foreign citizens on Contemporary legal consciousness of citizens of litigation issues, analyze the causes and propose a solution.