- 无标题文档
查看论文信息

论文中文题名:

 A医药公司销售经理绩效考核体系优化研究    

姓名:

 张雯    

学号:

 21302219041    

保密级别:

 公开    

论文语种:

 chi    

学科代码:

 125100    

学科名称:

 管理学 - 工商管理    

学生类型:

 硕士    

学位级别:

 工商管理硕士    

学位年度:

 2025    

培养单位:

 西安科技大学    

院系:

 管理学院    

专业:

 工商管理    

研究方向:

 组织行为与人力资源管理    

第一导师姓名:

 白芙蓉    

第一导师单位:

 西安科技大学    

论文提交日期:

 2025-06-12    

论文答辩日期:

 2025-06-07    

论文外文题名:

 Research on the Optimization ont color='red'>ofont> the Performance Evaluation System for Sales Managers at Pharmaceutical Company A    

论文中文关键词:

 销售经理 ; 绩效考核 ; 医药公司 ; 平衡计分卡    

论文外文关键词:

 Sales Manager ; Performance Evaluation ; Pharmaceutical Company ; Balanced Scorecard    

论文中文摘要:

随着中共中央、国务院向社会公布关于深化医药卫生体制改革的意见,基于国家切实缓解“看病难、看病贵”问题的目标,医药企业根据市场现状调整销售策略已成为其发展的必然选择。销售策略的调整直接作用于销售人员身上,医药企业为了增强客户信任度及促进销售活动的顺利进行而将销售人员对外统一宣称为销售经理。因此,在新的市场规则和竞争格局下,推动销售经理的积极性尤为重要,应持续优化销售经理的绩效考核体系,最终提高医药企业的销售水平和效果。

本文以A医药公司销售经理为研究对象,对其现行的绩效考核体系存在的问题进行深入分析,并基于平衡计分卡法提出相应的优化策略。首先,基于国内外绩效考核内容、绩效考核方法和医药公司销售人员考核的相关文献研究,在目标管理理论、期望理论、公平理论的理论基础上,对A医药公司销售经理绩效考核现状进行分析,指出销售经理绩效考核体系存在的一系列问题;其次,根据平衡计分卡的财务、客户、内部流程以及员工学习与发展四个维度对A医药公司销售经理绩效考核现行体系从指标权重、评价标准、沟通机制等方面提出优化方案;最后,为确保优化方案的顺利落地,从企业文化、组织制度及实施体系三个方面提出具体的保障措施。研究发现:销售经理对现行绩效考核体系满意度未达到60%的基准线,存在考核目标设定偏差、评价指标及评价标准不合理、考核过程沟通困难、申诉机制不畅、结果应用局限等问题;基于企业文化和组织制度等保障和措施,通过调查问卷的方法对受访者进行二次调查,结果表明A医药公司销售经理绩效考核体系优化效果良好,满意度提高到80%。

本研究对优化A医药公司销售经理绩效考核体系具有重要指导作用,也能为医药行业其他企业销售经理绩效考核体系的实施提供有益借鉴。

论文外文摘要:

With the Central Committee ont color='red'>ofont> the Communist Party ont color='red'>ofont> China and The State Council releasing their opinions on deepening the reform ont color='red'>ofont> the medical and health care system to the public, based on the national goal ont color='red'>ofont> effectively alleviating the problems ont color='red'>ofont> "difficulty and high cost in seeking medical treatment", it has become an inevitable choice for pharmaceutical enterprises to adjust their sales strategies in accordance with the current market situation.The adjustment ont color='red'>ofont> sales strategies directly affects the sales staff. To enhance customer trust and facilitate the smooth progress ont color='red'>ofont> sales activities, pharmaceutical companies uniformly refer to their sales staff as sales managers when communicating with the outside.Therefore, under the new market rules and competitive landscape, it is particularly important to motivate sales managers. The performance appraisal system for sales managers should be continuously optimized to ultimately enhance the sales performance and effectiveness ont color='red'>ofont> pharmaceutical enterprises.

This paper takes the sales manager ont color='red'>ofont> Company A as the research subject, conducting an in-depth analysis ont color='red'>ofont> the issues existing in the current performance evaluation system for sales managers, and proposes corresponding optimization strategies based on the Balanced Scorecard method.Firstly, based on research from domestic and international literature regarding performance evaluation content, methods, and the assessment ont color='red'>ofont> pharmaceutical sales personnel, this study analyzes the current state ont color='red'>ofont> performance evaluation for sales managers at Company A. This analysis is conducted within the theoretical frameworks ont color='red'>ofont> goal management theory, expectancy theory, and equity theory, identifying a series ont color='red'>ofont> issues present in the existing performance evaluation system for sales managers;Secondly, based on the four dimensions ont color='red'>ofont> the balanced scorecard—financial performance, customer perspective, internal business processes, and learning and growth for employees—an optimization plan is proposed for the current performance evaluation system ont color='red'>ofont> sales managers at A Pharmaceutical Company, focusing on aspects such as indicator weights, evaluation criteria, and communication mechanisms;Finally, to ensure the smooth implementation ont color='red'>ofont> the optimization plan, specific safeguard measures are proposed from three aspects: corporate culture, organizational systems, and implementation frameworks.Research findings indicate that sales managers' satisfaction with the current performance evaluation system does not reach the 60% benchmark, highlighting issues such as improper setting ont color='red'>ofont> evaluation goals, unreasonable evaluation criteria and standards, difficulties in communication during the evaluation process, inadequate appeal mechanisms, and limited application ont color='red'>ofont> evaluation results;Based on corporate culture and organizational systems, among other safeguards and measures, a follow-up survey was conducted through questionnaires. The results indicate that the performance evaluation system for sales managers at A Pharmaceutical Company has been effectively optimized, with satisfaction levels increasing to 80%.

This study provides significant guidance for optimizing the performance evaluation system ont color='red'>ofont> sales managers at A Pharmaceutical Company and can also ont color='red'>ofont>fer valuable references for implementing similar systems in other pharmaceutical industry enterprises.

参考文献:

[1]Otina O F , Guantai H K , Mange D . Influence of Performance Appraisal Feedback on Service Delivery among Public Secondary School Teachers in Londiani Sub-County, Kericho County, Kenya[J]. The International Journal of Humanities & Social Studies, 2021, 9(4):101-104.

[2]Omneya A K , Ashraf S , Eldin B B . Financial Performance Appraisal Using Economic Values Added in Emerging Markets: Evidence from Egyptian Listed Firms[J]. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 2021, 09(3):415-434.

[3]Jha J K , Ray P . 'They Care & We Share'- Influence of Fairness in Performance Appraisal Systems on Knowledge Sharing of IT Professionals[J]. International Journal of Knowledge Management, 2022, 18(2):101-104.

[4]Ullah Z , Lvarez-Otero S , Sulaiman M , et al. Achieving Organizational Social Sustainability through Electronic Performance Appraisal Systems: The Moderating Influence of Transformational Leadership[J]. Sustainability, 2021, 13(10):5611-5618.

[5]Touma J . Performance Appraisal Effect on Compensation[J]. Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies, 2022,10(1):12-14.

[6]Yi X , Lu S , Tan J . Ethical Review of Performance Appraisal[M]. Asvances in Intelligent Systems and Computing,2022:269-277.

[7]Alam M, Singh P. Performance feedback interviews as affective events: An exploration of the impact of emotion regulation of negative performance feedback on supervisor– employee dyads[J].Human Resource Management Review, 2019, 31(2):1-14.

[8]Wang J . Innovation of Employee Performance Appraisal Model Based on Data Mining[J]. International Conference on Cognitive based Information Processing and Application (CIPA),2022,(2):39-43.

[9]Lu H Z, Zhao P, Liu S W. Research on Performance Appraisal Method in Internet-based Working[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series,2021,1815(1):22-27.

[10]Chopra R. 720 degree performance appraisals: a new paradigm[J]. ACADEMICIA: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal,2018,5(7):30-38.

[11]Zhou L, Wang H F, Liu L Y. Multi-Role-Based Employee Performance Appraisal Method for Manufacturing Enterprise[J]. Advanced Materials Research,2018, 5(7):628-630.

[12]Lu H, Zhao P, Liu S. Research on Performance Appraisal Method in Internet-based Working[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2021,1815(1):01-04.

[13]Habibi R, Guénette L, Lexchin J, et al. Regulating Information or Allowing Deception? Pharmaceutical Sales Visits in Canada, France, and the United States[J]. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2016(4):602-613.

[14]Zalika K K, Janko K. The assessment of pharmaceutical sales representatives by family physicians-does it affect the prescribing index?[J]. Family practice, 2013(3): 320-324.

[15]李方圆, 徐光华, 凌晨. 绩效“金字塔”评价模式逻辑框架[J]. 西南民族大学报:人文社会科学版, 2020, 41(1):81-88.

[16]李强, 暴丽艳, 郝丽等. 国内科研人员激励研究范围与热点分析[J]. 科技和产业, 2019, 19(8):61-66.

[17]张洪玮. D公司研发人员绩效考核体系研究[D]. 2019, 北京:北京交通大学.

[18]周洁, 张建卫, 李海红等.军工研发人员生涯适应力对其创新行为、离职意向的作用机制:一个整合性过程模型[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2019, 36(9):10-19.

[19]林子薇,唐海涛.软件研发人员产出度量方法的研究[J].计算机时代,2023,(08):134-136 +140.

[20]张小峰.绩效管理十原则[J].企业管理,2023(07):90-93.

[21]王磊.新医改后医院护理人员人力资源绩效考核体系构建原则与设计理念[J].护理实践与研究,2021,18(15):2318-2322.

[22]赵昌明.SMART原则在山煤集团绩效考核中的分析[J].营销界,2019(35):13-14.

[23]江帆.企业绩效考核原则[J].人才资源开发,2018(09):84-85.

[24]朋震,陈德峰.破解职能类员工绩效考核困局——关键事件举证法的运用[J]. 企业管理,2020,(05):86-89.

[25]蒋雪丽, 郝英奇.KPI引导员工积极性的作用机理研究[J]. 科技管理研究, 2019,31(11): 5-7.

[26]赵敏姣. 企业绩效考核指标设置[J]. 商业时代, 2019,000(033):38-39.

[27]钟磊, 王鲁捷. 企业经营者绩效考核指标探究[J]. 经济学动态, 2017,000(002):39-41.

[28]杜驰平. 基于层次分析法对教师考核中教学指标权重的计算[J]. 福建茶叶, 2020, 42(3):2-4.

[29]王先利, 黄燕萍, 庞艳玉,等. PDCA循环管理法在妇产科医院临床药师绩效管理中的应用[J]. 中国药学杂志, 2019,(18):5-6.

[30]李华林.人力资源绩效考核方法与应用见解[J].中国集体经济,2022(08):104-105.

[31]洪婧,赵明娟.员工绩效考核方法对组织绩效的影响程度研究[J].商业观察,2021(09):54-56.

[32]杨永风.试论企业人力资源管理中绩效考核方法的应用[J].经济管理文摘,2021(03): 115-116.

[33]高展.人力资源绩效考核方法与应用见解[J].人才资源开发,2020(22):80-81.

[34]李星叶. SSW公司销售人员绩效考核体系优化研究[D].西安理工大学,2021.

[35]李娜. G公司销售人员绩效考核体系优化研究[D].河北工程大学,2021.

[36]邵鹏,张亚雯,李根强. 研发投入、销售费用对生物医药上市企业绩效的异质性影响[J].创新科技,2024,24(3):50-65.

[37]李璠,余伯阳,曹人元,等.基于结构-行为-绩效分析范式的药品流通领域供给侧结构性改革策略分析[J].中国药房,2017,28(10):1297-1301.

[38]段嘉.医药企业销售人员激励机制探究[J].现代商业,2016(2):109-110.

[39]刘永忠,王苛宁.浅谈药品生产企业销售人员管理[J].中国卫生产业,2015,12(12):50-52.

[40]邢丹丹.浅析融媒体中心绩效管理与激励机制的设计[J].想带商业研究,2024,(9):41-43.

[41]孙会, 徐永其, 纪兰. 基于平衡计分卡的企业绩效考核体系设计[J]. 企业管理, 2019,(9):3-6.

[42]冯兴龙, 胡泉光. 工程项目绩效考核管理研究[J]. 企业管理, 2017,(2):13-14.

[43]魏渝男, 李咏新, 殷铭. 基于BSC的通信企业绩效考核设计[J]. 财会通讯:中, 2018,(10):3-4.

[44]杨颖. M医药企业销售人员绩效管理研究[D].云南财经大学,2021.

[45]任东峰. 国有企业绩效考核问题探究——基于民生保障与应急保供背景[J]. 财会通讯, 2021,(22):4-6.

[46]郭延山, 叶青盛, 周卫华,等. 中石化共享服务公司“1+4”绩效考核的应用[J]. 财务与会计, 2021,(2):3-7.

[47]闫强, 马雷鹏, 魏锦涛,等. 探析关键绩效指标考核体系在企业绩效管理中的作用[J]. 中国周刊, 2020,(2):30-31.

[48]苏春雨. 基于KPI的企业绩效考核指标体系优化研究[J]. 商场现代化, 2018,(9):2-6.

[49]刘一丹. 企业销售员工绩效考核优化研究[D].天津财经大学,2020.

[50]陈沛然.员工绩效考评指标体系的动态螺旋模型[J].企业管理,2017(8):108-110.

[51]袁国辉,杨丽娟.KPI 考核的步骤与思路——以华为公司为例[J].新理财,2016(10):68-69.

[52]陈昱.基于 KPI 视角探讨绩效考核体系设计的方法[J].管理观察,2018(13):107-108.

[53]Jones P.绩效管理[M].上海:上海交通大学出版社,2017:137-139.

[54]Herman.A discussion of A Performance management[J].Journal of Accounting and Economics,2016(2): 32-36.

[55]Pulakos E D,Mueller,Hanson R,et al.Performance management can be fixed: An on-the-job experiential learning approach for complex behavior change[J].Industrial and Organizational Psychology,2018(1): 51-76.

[56]Levy P E,Silevrman S B,Cavanaugh C M,et al.The performance management fix is in: how practice can build on the research[J].Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2016,8(1): 80-85.

[57]张光进,廖建桥.我国知识员工绩效考核现状及启示[J].软科学,2015(2):104-108.

[58]戴治勇.法制、信任与企业激励薪酬设计[J].管理世界,2016(2):102-110.

中图分类号:

 F272.92    

开放日期:

 2025-06-27    

无标题文档

   建议浏览器: 谷歌 火狐 360请用极速模式,双核浏览器请用极速模式