- 无标题文档
查看论文信息

论文中文题名:

 CO2两相流动管路阻力和射流特性研究    

姓名:

 吴鹏志    

学号:

 19220089028    

保密级别:

 保密(1年后开放)    

论文语种:

 chi    

学科代码:

 083700    

学科名称:

 工学 - 安全科学与工程    

学生类型:

 硕士    

学位级别:

 工学硕士    

学位年度:

 2022    

培养单位:

 西安科技大学    

院系:

 安全科学与工程学院    

专业:

 安全科学与工程    

研究方向:

 清洁气体灭火技术    

第一导师姓名:

 刘长春    

第一导师单位:

 西安科技大学    

论文提交日期:

 2022-06-22    

论文答辩日期:

 2022-05-30    

论文外文题名:

 Research on pipelines resistance and jet characteristics of CO2 two-phase flow    

论文中文关键词:

 CO2 ; 阻力特性 ; 射流特性 ; 闪蒸 ; 冲击    

论文外文关键词:

 CO2 ; resistance characteristics ; jet characteristics ; flashing ; force    

论文中文摘要:

通过管道对液态CO2进行输送或泄放到大气中的情况在消防和工业领域中非常普遍,然而,由于CO2物性特殊,在大压降和大流量条件下,常引发管道结冰堵塞、断裂、窒息、冲击和冻伤等风险。带压管道或容器安全评估的核心是能准确预测其内部流动参数的变化规律,同时液态CO2的安全输送和安全泄放与CO2流动阻力和射流特性又密切相关,因此准确掌握CO2两相流动管路阻力和射流特性,构建数学模型量化其输送和泄放过程的关键参数变化,这对CO2管道系统的安全设计和事故后果预测至关重要。

本文设计和搭建了CO2管路流动阻力特性和射流冲击特性实验装置,采用实验、数学模型和模拟的方法研究液态CO2两相流动管路阻力和喷射特性,具体工作包括:

研究了喷嘴孔径的改变对CO2传输特性(压力、温度和质量流量)的影响,并且基于液态CO2的闪蒸延迟现象对传统的HEM(Homogenous Equilibrium Model)进行了修正,并假设延迟的液/气转变跟压降大小有关,发现改进后的模型在预测管道压降,尤其是大压力梯度下的延迟液/气转变方面具有良好的准确性。通过模型分析了等效粗糙度、质量流量、环境温度和海拔对压降的影响,还发现随着初始压力从2~7 MPa的增加,压降先升高后降低,因为在这个范围内均相CO2的密度有一个极值。

研究了喷嘴孔径、初始压力和冲击距离的改变对CO2射流特性(羽流结构、质量流量、冲击温度和冲击力)的影响。基于HEM假设构建了气-液两相等熵膨胀射流模型,并且该模型对射流流量的预测具有良好的准确性。分析模型计算结果发现,初始CO2流动状态和物性参数共同决定出口质量通量和出口压力,而喷嘴孔径只是改变了流通面积大小。还发现由于喷嘴出口处液态CO2的快速闪蒸会导致射流速度急剧增大,基于动量假设的冲击力计算结果与实验结果相差甚远。

建立了考虑实际气体状态方程的可压缩两相CO2射流CFD(Computational Fluid Dynamics)模型,并采用欧拉Mixture多相流模型对CO2喷嘴射流进行模拟研究,将有限实验结果对仿真模拟结果进行了可靠性验证,还对模型的计算结果进行了分析。

论文研究成果可为CO2管道系统的安全设计和优化运行提供理论基础和数据支撑。

论文外文摘要:

The transportation of liquid CO2 through pipelines or directly released into the atmosphere is very common in fire protection and industrial fields. However, due to the special physical properties of CO2, under the conditions of large pressure drop and large flow often lead to pipeline freezing and blockage, risk of breakage, suffocation, shock and frostbite. The core of the safety assessment of a pressurized pipeline or container is to accurately predict the change law of its internal flow parameters. At the same time, the safe transportation and discharge of liquid CO2 are closely related to the CO2 flow resistance and jet characteristics. Therefore, accurately grasping the pipeline resistance and jet characteristics of CO2 two-phase flow, and building a mathematical model to quantify the changes of key parameters in the transportation and release process are crucial to the safety design and consequences prediction of the CO2 pipeline system.

In this paper, both experimental devices for CO2 pipeline flow resistance and nozzle jet characteristics were designed and built, and the experiments, mathematical models and simulation methods were used to study the resistance and jet characteristics of liquid CO2 two-phase flow. The main works include:

The CO2 transport characteristics of different nozzle sizes were experimentally studied (including pressure, temperature and mass flow rate), and a modified HEM (Homogenous Equilibrium Model) was built to simulate the pressure drop behaviour considering the flashing delay phenomenon, assuming that the delayed liquid/vapour transition was related to the pressure drop, and the modified model has good accuracy for predicting pipe pressure drop, especially the delayed liquid/vapour transition under large pressure gradients. This model was also used to analyze the effects of equivalent roughness, mass flow, ambient temperature and elevation on the pressure drop, and it was found that with the increase of the initial pressure from 2 to 7 MPa, the pressure drop first increased and then decreased, because there is a density peak in this range.

The CO2 jet characteristics of different nozzle sizes, initial pressure and impact distance were experimentally studied (including jet structure, mass flow, impact temperature and impact force). A gas-liquid two-phase isentropic expansion jet model was built which based on HEM assumption, and this model has good accuracy for predicting the jet of mass flow rate. The model calculation results show that the initial CO2 flow and physical parameters determine the jet mass flux and outlet pressure, while the nozzle size could only change the flow area. It is also found that the rapid flashing of liquid CO2 at the nozzle outlet will increase the jet velocity. The force calculated results based on the momentum assumption are far from the experimental results.

A two-phase CO2 jet CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) model considering the real gas behavior was developed, and the Euler mixture multiphase flow model was used to simulate the CO2 nozzle jet, and the reliability of the simulation results was verified by the limited experimental results, and the CFD calculation result were analyzed.

The research results of this paper can provide theoretical basis and data support for the safe design and optimal operation of CO2 pipeline systems.

参考文献:

[1]GB50193-93. 二氧化碳灭火系统设计规范[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2010.

[2]Li Q, Chen Z A, Zhang J T, et al. Positioning and revision of CCUS technology development in China [J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2016, 46: 282-293.

[3]Aursand E, Dorum C, Hammer M, et al. CO2 Pipeline integrity: Comparison of a coupled fluid-structure model and uncoupled two-curve methods [J]. Energy Procedia, 2014, 51: 382-391.

[4]Connolly S, Cusco L. Hazards from high pressure carbon dioxide releases [J]. IChemE Symp Ser, 2007, 153: 1-5.

[5]Mendes, Renato, Lowesmith, et al. COSHER joint industry project: Large scale pipeline rupture tests to study CO2 release and dispersion [J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2015, 37: 340-353.

[6]DNV-RP-J202. Design and operation of CO2 pipelines[H]. Norway: Det Norske Veritas, 2010.

[7]Oh H K, Son C H. Flow boiling heat transfer and pressure drop characteristics of CO2 in horizontal tube of 4.57-mm inner diameter [J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2011, 31(2-3): 163-172.

[8]Jones D G, Cosham A, Armstrong K, et al. Fracture-propagation control in dense-phase CO2 pipelines // [C] 6th International pipeline technology conference: Ostend, Belgium, Tiratsoo Technical, 2013: 7-9.

[9]Brown S, Martynov S, Mahgerefteh H, et al. A homogeneous relaxation flow model for the full bore rupture of dense phase CO2 pipelines [J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2013, 17: 349-356.

[10]Martynov S, Brown S, Mahgerefteh H, et al. Modelling three-phase releases of carbon dioxide from high-pressure pipelines [J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2013, 92(1): 36-46.

[11]Munkejord S T, Hammer M. Depressurization of CO2-rich mixtures in pipes: Two-phase flow modelling and comparison with experiments [J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2015, 37: 398-411.

[12]Xu B P, Jie H E, Wen J X. A pipeline depressurization model for fast decompression and slow blowdown [J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels & Piping, 2014, 123-124: 60-69.

[13]Woolley, R. M, Fairweather, et al. An integrated multi-scale modelling approach for the simulation of multiphase dispersion from accidental CO2 pipeline releases in realistic terrain [J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2014, 27: 221-238.

[14]Baroudi H A, Patchigolla K, Thanganadar D, et al. Experimental study of accidental leakage behaviour of liquid CO2 under shipping conditions [J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2021, 153: 439-451.

[15]Liu X, Godbole A, Lu C, et al. Study of the consequences of CO2 released from high-pressure pipelines - ScienceDirect [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2015, 116: 51-64.

[16]Liu Z, Zhao Y, Ren T, et al. Experimental study of the flow characteristics and impact of dense-phase CO2 jet releases [J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2018, 116: 208-218.

[17]Pursell M. Experimental investigation of high pressure liquid CO2 release behaviour [J]. 2012, Institution of Chemical Engineers Symposium Series, 2012, : 164-171.

[18]Vree B, Ahmad M, Buit L, et al. Rapid depressurization of a CO2 pipeline – an experimental study [J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2015, 41: 41-49.

[19]Xie Q, Tu R, Jiang X, et al. The leakage behavior of supercritical CO2 flow in an experimental pipeline system [J]. Applied Energy, 2014, 130(oct.1): 574-580.

[20]Huh C, Cho M I, Hong S, et al. Effect of impurities on depressurization of CO2 pipeline transport [J]. Energy Procedia, 2014, 63: 2583-2588.

[21]Cooper R. National Grid's COOLTRANS research programme [J]. Journal of Pipeline Engineering, 2012, 11(3): 155-172.

[22]Witlox H, Harper M, Oke A, et al. Phast validation of discharge and atmospheric dispersion for pressurised carbon dioxide releases [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2014, 30: 243-255.

[23]Han S H, Chang D, Kim J, et al. Experimental investigation of the flow characteristics of jettisoning in a CO2 carrier [J]. Process Safety & Environmental Protection, 2014, 92(1): 60-69.

[24]Clausen S, Oosterkamp A, Strom K L. Depressurization of a 50 km Long 24 inches CO2 Pipeline [J]. Energy Procedia, 2012, 23: 256-265.

[25]Cosham A, Jones D G, Armstrong K, et al. The decompression behaviour of carbon dioxide in the dense phase [C]. //proceedings of the International Pipeline Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 2012: 1-18.

[26]Botros K K, Hippert E, Craidy P. Measuring decompression wave speed in CO2 mixtures by a shock tube [J]. Pipelines Int, 2013, 16: 22-28.

[27]Michael, Drescher, Kristoffer, et al. Experiments and modelling of two-phase transient flow during pipeline depressurization of CO2 with various N2 compositions [J]. Energy Procedia, 2014, 63: 2448-2457.

[28]Gu S, Li Y, Teng L, et al. An experimental study on the flow characteristics during the leakage of high pressure CO2 pipelines [J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2019, 125: 92-101.

[29]Cosham A, Jones D G, Armstrong K, et al. Ruptures in gas pipelines, liquid pipelines and dense phase carbon dioxide pipelines //[C] proceedings of the 2012 9th International Pipeline Conference, IPC 2012, American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2012: 465–82.

[30]Ahmad M, Osch B V, Buit L, et al. Study of the thermohydraulics of CO2 discharge from a high pressure reservoir [J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2013, 19: 63-73.

[31]Mahgerefteh H, Wong S M A. A numerical blowdown simulation incorporating cubic equations of state [J]. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 1999, 23(9): 1309-1317.

[32]Oke A, Mahgerefteh H, Economou I, et al. A transient outflow model for pipeline puncture [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2003, 58(20): 4591-4604.

[33]Martynov S, Brown S, Mahgerefteh H, et al. Modelling choked flow for CO2 from the dense phase to below the triple point [J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2013, 19: 552-558.

[34]Botros K K, Hippert E, Craidy P. Measuring decompression wave speed in CO2 mixtures by a shock tube [J]. Pipelines Int, 2013, 16: 22-28.

[35]Webber D M. Generalising two-phase homogeneous equilibrium pipeline and jet models to the case of carbon dioxide [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2011, 24(4): 356-360.

[36]Allason D, Armstrong K, Barnett J, et al. Behaviour of releases of carbon dioxide from pipelines and vents //[C] 10th Int American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 2014: 1-10.

[37]Li K, Zhou X, Tu R, et al. The flow and heat transfer characteristics of supercritical CO2 leakage from a pipeline [J]. Energy, 2014, 71: 665-672.

[38]Liu Y H, Calvert G, Hare C, et al. Size measurement of dry ice particles produced from liquid carbon dioxide [J]. Journal of Aerosol Science, 2012, 48: 1-9.

[39]Lin T C, Shen Y J, Wang M R. Effects of superheat on characteristics of flashing spray and snow particles produced by expanding liquid carbon dioxide [J]. Journal of Aerosol Science, 2013, 61: 27-35.

[40]Toesse S, Vaagsaether K, Lundberg J, et al. Experimental study of CO2 Releases from a Saturated Liquid Reservoir [J]. Energy Procedia, 2013, 37(1): 4818-4824.

[41]Wareing C J, Fairweather M, Falle S A E G, et al. Modelling ruptures of buried high pressure dense phase CO2 pipelines in carbon capture and storage applications—Part I. Validation [J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2015, 42: 701-711.

[42]Peng D-Y, Robinson D B. A new two-constant equation of state [J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals, 1976, 15(1): 59-64.

[43]Span R, Wagner W. A new equation of state for carbon dioxide covering the fluid region from the triple‐point temperature to 1100 K at pressures up to 800 MPa [J]. Journal of Physical & Chemical Reference Data, 1996, 25(6): 1509-1596.

[44]Soave G. Equilibrium constants from a modified Redlich-Kwong equation of state [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 1972, 27(6): 1197-1203.

[45]Munkejord S T, Hammer M, Løvseth S W. CO2 transport: Data and models – A review [J]. Applied Energy, 2016, 169: 499-523.

[46]Liu X, Godbole A, Lu C, et al. Source strength and dispersion of CO2 releases from high-pressure pipelines: CFD model using real gas equation of state [J]. Applied Energy, 2014, 126: 56-68.

[47]Woolley R M, Fairweather M, Wareing C J, et al. Experimental measurement and Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes modelling of the near-field structure of multi-phase CO2 jet releases [J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2013, 18: 139-149.

[48]Wilding W V, Rowley R L, Oscarson J L. DIPPR® Project 801 evaluated process design data [J]. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 1998, 150-151:413-420.

[49]vanderVoort M M, vandenBerg A C, Roekaerts D J E M, et al. Blast from explosive evaporation of carbon dioxide: experiment, modeling and physics [J]. Shock Waves, 2012, 22(2): 129-140.

[50]Zheng W, Mahgerefteh H, Brown S, et al. Integral multiphase turbulence compressible jet expansion model for accidental releases from pressurized containments [J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2016, 55(27): 7558-7568.

[51]Wang X, Song Z, Pan X, et al. Simulation study on near-field structure and flow characteristics of high-pressure CO2 released from the pipeline [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2021, 71:104481.

[52]李康. 小尺度超临界二氧化碳泄漏过程物理机理研究[D]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2016.

[53]Kieffer S W. Sound speed in liquid - gas mixtures: Water - air and water - steam [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1977, 82(20): 2895-2904.

[54]Daugherty R L, Ingersoll A C. Fluid mechanics [M]. McGraw-Hill, 1954.

[55]Wallis G B. One-dimensional two-phase flow [M]. McGraw-Hill, 1969.

[56]Kunz O. The GERG-2004 Wide-Range Equation of State for Natural Gases and Other Mixtures [J]. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 2007, 57(11): 3032–3091.

[57]Colebrook C F. Turbulent flow in pipes, with particular reference to the transition region between the smooth and rough pipe laws [J]. Journal of the ICE, 1939, 11(4): 133-156.

[58]McAdams W H, Woods W K, Heroman L C. Vaporization inside horizontal tubes. II benzene-oil mixture [J]. Trans ASME, 1942, 64(3): 193-200.

[59]杨世铭, 陶文铨. 传热学[M]. 第4版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006: 460-462

[60]Zucrow M, Hoffman J. Gas dynamics. Volume 2 - Multidimensional flow [M]. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1977.

[61]Elias E, Lellouche G S. Two-phase critical flow [J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 1994, 20: 91-168.

[62]孔珑. 工程流体力学[M]. 第2版. 北京:水利电力出版社, 1979.

[63]Liu L G . Compression and phase behavior of solid CO2 to half a megabar [J]. Earth & Planetary Science Letters, 1984, 71(1):104-110.

[64]Teng L, Liu X, Bian J, et al. A homogeneous relaxation model for multi-phase CO2 jets following the release of supercritical CO2 pipelines [J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2020, 84:103609.

中图分类号:

 TU998.1    

开放日期:

 2023-06-22    

无标题文档

   建议浏览器: 谷歌 火狐 360请用极速模式,双核浏览器请用极速模式