- 无标题文档
查看论文信息

论文中文题名:

 重大突发事件心理危机干预多元网格化服务模式研究    

姓名:

 张江江    

学号:

 20220226107    

保密级别:

 保密(1年后开放)    

论文语种:

 chi    

学科代码:

 085700    

学科名称:

 工学 - 资源与环境    

学生类型:

 硕士    

学位级别:

 工程硕士    

学位年度:

 2023    

培养单位:

 西安科技大学    

院系:

 安全科学与工程学院    

专业:

 安全工程    

研究方向:

 安全与应急管理    

第一导师姓名:

 田水承    

第一导师单位:

 西安科技大学    

论文提交日期:

 2023-06-19    

论文答辩日期:

 2023-06-06    

论文外文题名:

 Research on the Construction of Diversified Service Mode of Psychological Crisis Intervention in Major Emergencies    

论文中文关键词:

 重大突发事件 ; 心理危机干预 ; 服务模式 ; 扎根理论 ; 系统动力学    

论文外文关键词:

 Major emergency ; Psychological crisis intervention ; Service mode ; Grounded theory ; System dynamics    

论文中文摘要:

社会重大突发事件往往给某些民众带来严重的心理创伤,而现有的心理危机干预服务能力距满足民众心理健康需求尚有较大差距。心理危机干预有利于改善民众的心理问题,但现有心理危机干预模式较为单一、覆盖面不足、有效性欠佳。有鉴于此,本文旨在提高心理危机干预服务水平,从多元网格化视角对现有心理危机干预模式进行优化,主要研究工作和结论如下:

首先,构建了心理危机干预服务影响因素模型。阐述了心理危机干预相关理论的研究现状,基于扎根理论对X社区民众进行访谈,通过多级编码提取出7个心理危机干预服务影响因素:协同合作、服务保障、管理控制、运行动力、激励、信息反馈、服务传播,构建心理危机干预服务影响因素理论模型。根据心理危机干预服务影响因素设计调查问卷,对问卷数据进行信效度分析、模型适配度检验,构建心理危机干预服务影响因素结构方程模型,从而验证了依据扎根理论提出的心理危机干预服务影响因素模型。

其次,构建了“社区-政府-社会专业机构”联动网格化心理危机干预模式。根据福利多元理论及心理危机干预服务影响因素间的关系,构建“社区-政府-社会专业机构”联动网格化心理危机干预模式,结合网格化管理思维设计协同合作机制等7个心理危机干预模式运行子机制,综合构建“社区-政府-社会专业机构”联动网格化心理危机干预模式的总体运行机制。

最后,构建“社区-政府-社会专业机构”联动网格化心理危机干预模式系统动力学模型,对该模式进行模拟,对比分析服务水平提升效果,得出了提高心理危机干预服务水平的主要影响因素。运用系统动力学方法,分别构建协同合作机制等7个机制子系统的SD模型,发现各影响因素与相对应的子系统均呈正相关关系,各子系统均与心理危机干预服务水平呈正相关关系。对“社区-政府-社会专业机构”联动网格化心理危机干预模式及各子系统SD模型进行仿真模拟,结果表明:各影响因素对心理危机干预服务水平提升效果良好。通过各影响因素提升效果对比分析,其中社区统筹、技术保障、职能划分、完善薪酬分配制度、管理信息系统、个体自我反馈、宣传渠道等因素影响效果较好。

综上,本文通过民众心理危机干预服务影响因素的提取,得到了7个主要维度的影响因素,根据各因素间的关系构建“社区-政府-社会专业机构”联动网格化心理危机干预模式,通过对该模式的运行机制进行仿真模拟,得到影响程度较大的因素,可以为开展社区心理危机干预服务工作提供指导和参考。

论文外文摘要:

Major social emergencies often bring serious psychological trauma to some people, and there is still a large gap between the existing capacity of psychological crisis intervention services and people's mental health needs. Psychological crisis intervention is beneficial to improve people's psychological problems, but the existing psychological crisis intervention mode is relatively simple, insufficient coverage, poor effectiveness. In view of this, this study aims to improve the level of psychological crisis intervention services and optimize the existing psychological crisis intervention mode from the perspective of multivariate grid, the main research work and conclusions are as follows:

Firstly, the influencing factor model of psychological crisis intervention service is constructed. This paper elaborates on the current research status of relevant psychological crisis intervention theories and conducts interviews with X community residents based on grounded theory. Through multi-level coding, seven factors influencing psychological crisis intervention services: collaboration, service guarantee, management control, operational power, incentives, feedback, and service dissemination are extracted, and constructs a theoretical model for the factors influencing psychological crisis intervention services. Based on these factors, this paper designs a survey questionnaire and analyzes its reliability and validity, as well as the model's fitness, to construct a structural equation model for the factors influencing psychological crisis intervention services, thereby validating the model proposed by grounded theory.

Secondly, a "community-government-social professional institution" collaborative networked psychological crisis intervention model is developed. Based on the theory of welfare pluralism and the relationship between factors influencing psychological crisis intervention services, this paper constructs a collaborative networked psychological crisis intervention model for the "community-government-social professional institution" triad. By combining the concept of networked management, designs seven operational sub-mechanisms for the psychological crisis intervention model, such as collaborative mechanisms for coordinated cooperation. A overall operational mechanism of the "community-government-social professional institution" collaborative networked psychological crisis intervention model is comprehensively constructed.

Finally, a system dynamics model is constructed for the "community-government-social professional institution" linked grid psychological crisis intervention model, and simulations are conducted to compare and analyze the effect of service level improvement, identifying the main influencing factors for improving psychological crisis intervention services. Using the system dynamics method, SD models are constructed for the seven mechanism subsystems, such as the collaborative mechanism, and it is found that each influencing factor had a positive correlation with the corresponding subsystem, and all subsystems hsve a positive correlation with the level of psychological crisis intervention services. Simulations are conducted for the "community-government-social professional institution" linked grid psychological crisis intervention model and the various subsystem SD models, and the results show that each influencing factor has a good effect on improving the level of psychological crisis intervention services. Through comparative analysis of the effects of each influencing factor, it is found that factors such as community planning, technological support, functional division, improved salary distribution system, management information system, individual self-feedback, and promotion channels have a better effect on service improvement.

In summary, this study extracts the influential factors of public psychological crisis intervention services and identified 7 main dimensions. Based on the relationships among these factors, a "community-government-social professional organization" collaborative network-based psychological crisis intervention model is constructed. Through simulating the operation mechanism of this model, significant factors are identified, which can provide guidance and reference for community psychological crisis intervention services.

参考文献:

[1]张海涛, 张春龙, 栾宇, 等. 哲学视角的重大突发事件图景建构研究[J].情报学报, 2022, 41(12): 1294-1304.

[2]杨方玲, 刘梅. 新冠疫情期间高校毕业生领悟社会支持与就业焦虑的关系:心理弹性的中介作用[J]. 沧州师范学院学报, 2023, 39(01): 85-88+100.

[3]熊莉娟, 李倩, 曹雄晶, 等. 中国重症新冠肺炎医务人员出院后心理健康、健康相关生活质量和肺功能随访调查[J]. 浙江大学学报B辑(生物医学与生物技术)(英文版), 2023, 24(03): 269-275.

[4]郑海燕, 李虹静, 陈艳, 等. 新冠肺炎疫情下大学生心理健康状况及影响因素分析[J]. 卫生职业教育, 2023, 41(01): 125-129.

[5]肖秀英, 张凤, 刘敏利, 等. 新冠疫情期间酒店隔离观察者心理状况调查[J]. 心理月刊, 2022, 17(23): 217-219+222.

[6]Maunder R, Hunter J, Vincent L, et al. The immediate psychological and occupational impact of the 2003 SARS outbreak in a teaching hospital[J]. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2003, 168(10): 1245-1251.

[7]Norman A. Principles of Preventive Psychiatry by Gerald Caplan[J]. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 2015, 15(2): 271-272.

[8]Chellam N, Divya D. The effect of promoting mental health through employee assistance program[J]. Journal of Education, Society & Multiculturalism, 2022, 3(2): 48-60.

[9]Soltan Mohamed, Dawoud Mariam. Psychological crisis intervention protocol for isolated coronavirus disease 2019 patients[J]. Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry, 2022, 43(1): 1-6.

[10]Tian F Y, Li H X, Tian S C, et al. Psychological symptoms of ordinary Chinese citizens based on SCL-90 during the level I emergency response to COVID-19[J]. Psychiatry Research, 2020, 288: 112992.

[11]Giordano Filippo, Losurdo Antonia, Quaranta Vitaliano Nicola, et al. Effect of single session receptive music therapy on anxiety and vital parameters in hospitalized Covid-19 patients: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Scientific Reports, 2022, 12(1): 3154.

[12]Davis D M, Hayes J A. What are the benefits of mindfulness? A practice review of psychotherapy-related research [J]. Psychotherapy, 2011, 48(2): 198-208.

[13]Poremski D, Loo E, Chan C Y W, et al. Reducing injury during restraint by crisis intervention in psychiatric wards in singapore.[J]. East Asian Archives of Psychiatry : Official Journal of the Hong Kong College of Psychiatrists, 2019, 29(4): 129-135.

[14]Aroff Shimin. Basic strategies of online preventive psychological crisis intervention for school children aged 12-15[J]. Journal of Educational Research and Policies, 2023, 5(2).

[15]沈叶萍. 初中生青春期发展性心理危机现状分析及预防研究 [D]. 上海: 上海社会科学院, 2014.

[16]柳静, 王铭, 孙启武, 等. 我国大学生心理咨询与危机干预的管理现状调查[J].中国临床心理学杂志, 2022, 30(02): 477-482.

[17]王建平, 李欢. 芦山地震心理危机干预“二次伤害”的法律控制——以张支蓉叠加性损害的心理援助义务法律化为视角[J]. 理论与改革, 2014, 200(06): 150-154.

[18]于红军. 汶川地震后幸存人员心理危机干预方法研究[J]. 灾害学, 2019, 34(04): 176-180.

[19]田方圆, 田水承, 李红霞, 等. 新冠疫情下民众心理特征与应急管理体系完善[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(11): 30-36.

[20]李明, 曹海军. 我国网格化服务管理政策的特质与调适——基于97份中央和省级政策文本的分析[J]. 东南学术, 2023(01): 114-125.

[21]徐淑华, 陈建新, 祁慧. 基层网格化应急治理:主要问题及改进路径[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(01): 8-17.

[22]张雪琴. 国外重大灾害心理援助机制和组织方式的研究[J]. 现代预防医学, 2011, 38(06): 1057-9+62.

[23]曹蓉, 刘奕. 应急管理心理干预的政府角色探析[J]. 中国行政管理, 2013, (02): 36-9.

[24]张华威, 彭琨. 国外政府应急管理中的心理危机干预经验与启示[J]. 广州市公安管理干部学院学报, 2017, 27(04): 36-40.

[25]王疐曈. 政府主导的应急管理心理危机干预模式的构建[J]. 党政干部学刊, 2016(11): 60-63.

[26]季卫东, 周国权, 方文莉, 等. 社区心理危机应对干预实验模型的初步建构及其作用[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2010, 18(02): 162-4.

[27]叶瑜敏. 媒体在公共危机管理中的角色与功能——公共管理的视角[J]. 兰州学刊, 2010(11): 32-4.

[28]苗地. 公共危机管理中的媒体责任——以“抢盐事件”为例[J]. 黑龙江教育学院学报, 2011, 30(11): 191-2.

[29]伊庆山. 基层治理中网格化服务管理的实践经验与问题破解[J]. 领导科学, 2022(02): 92-97.

[30]孟秋赟. 协同视域下社区碳达峰与网格化治理耦合路径研究——以S市X小区为例[J]. 环境科学与管理, 2022, 47(02): 97-101.

[31]常丽艳, 高建武, 茹敬涵. 网格化管理标准化的现状及建议[J]. 中国标准化, 2022, (04): 52-55.

[32]何继新, 付美佳. 网格化管理在社区基层公共服务网络关系中的变迁动力与反思对策[J]. 杭州师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 43(06): 114-123.

[33]陈莉莉. 公共图书馆信息素养教育多元化服务模式研究[J]. 图书馆工作与研究, 2021(11): 5-10.

[34]张夸夸, 姜鑫. 网格化管理在基层社会治理中的应用[N]. 中国社会科学报, 2023(11).

[35]秦攀博. 突发公共事件影响下城市社区弱势群体的心理疏导——以危机心理干预为视角[J]. 理论月刊, 2022, 482(02): 103-113.

[36]Kanellopoulos Dora, Solomonov Nili, Ritholtz Shira, et al. The CopeNYP program: A model for brief treatment of psychological distress among healthcare workers and hospital staff.[J]. General Hospital Psychiatry, 2021, 73: 24-29.

[37]Zhang Li, Li Lingjiang, Zheng Wanhong, et al. Psychosocial crisis intervention for coronavirus disease 2019 patients and healthcare workers.[J]. Journal of Central South University, 2023, 48(1): 192-105.

[38]Karimian Zahra, Farrokhi Majid Reza, Moghadami Mohsen, et al. Medical education and COVID-19 pandemic: a crisis management model towards an evolutionary pathway[J]. Education and Information Technologies, 2021:21-22.

[39]North C S, Hong B A. Project Cerst: a new model for mental health intervention after a community disaster[J]. American Journal of Public Health, 2000, 90(7): 1057-8.

[40]Anuradha Yellanki. Critical Incident Stress Management (CISM)[J]. International Journal of Emergency Mental Health and Human Resilience, 2021, 23(3): 55-56.

[41]Besse Sarah, Kaniuka Andréa, Zabelski Sasha, et al. The holistic prevention & intervention model: A public health approach to college mental health and suicide prevention[J]. Journal of American College Health : J of ACH, 2023:1-5.

[42]Mette Aadahl, Mette Aadahl, Henrik Vardinghus-Nielsen, et al. Our healthy community conceptual framework and intervention model for health promotion and disease prevention in municipalities[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2023, 20(5): 3901.

[43]安芹, 贾晓明, 李波, 等. 危机事件后心理干预模式的探索—非典后大学生小组心理干预研究报告[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2005(01): 51-3.

[44]耿婕. 社会性危机事件处理新模式:危机干预与危机管理的结合[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2005.

[45]张玉茹. 突发社会灾难的危机干预研究[J]. 河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2004(01): 93-95.

[46]董旻晔. 基于模拟教育的心理危机干预核心能力发展模式研究[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2019.

[47]常欣. 社区心理危机干预工作面临的问题及对策[J]. 科技展望, 2015, 25(26): 252.

[48]于芮. 呼伦贝尔市海拉尔区蒙古族多元化养老服务模式构建研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2017.

[49]陈梦琪. 大学生心理健康的监管和心理危机干预的模式探索—以高校网络育人体系为视角[J]. 成才, 2021(19): 52-53.

[50]赵楠, 杨侠. 完善沈阳城市应急心理服务体系的新模型[J]. 理论界, 2020, 566(12): 104-108.

[51]南菲菲, 赵毅, 傅素芬, 等. 浙江省新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情下远程心理危机干预服务[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2021, 29(03): 367-370.

[52]王志敏, 仲学锋, 张莲芝, 等. 安徽省突发公共事件后公众心理危机干预状况及需求调查[J]. 安徽预防医学杂志, 2010, 16(05): 366-8.

[53]钱静, 刘奕. 突发事件分析的EOC概念模型[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 62(02): 259-265.

[54]高丽娜. 萨提亚模式在大学生预防性心理危机干预中的应用[J]. 心理月刊, 2022, 17(14): 193-195.

[55]高存友, 王振, 汪晓晖, 等. 新型冠状病毒肺炎定点收治医院医患心理援助服务模式的构建与应用[J]. 中国卫生资源, 2021, 24(01): 85-89.

[56]栾宇, 张海涛, 庞宇飞, 等. 面向重大突发事件的智慧政府情报决策系统构建研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2023, 46(03): 51-59.

[57]张滨熠. 突发事件心理危机干预的进展与思考——以我国新冠肺炎疫情应对为例[J]. 中国应急管理科学, 2022, (01): 36-43.

[58]Alexander Hicks. Two possible welfare state futures: left corporatist sweden and "Welfare Pluralism" theory[J]. Contemporary Sociology, 1989, 18(2): 247-251.

[59]卫小将. 中国社会福利发展的动因与机理[J]. 吉林大学社会科学学报, 2022, 62(05): 59-71+236.

[60]田雨同, 张艳, 王荣华, 等. 基于福利多元理论的医养结合养老服务的发展现状[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2020, 40(08): 1773-1777.

[61]宋娜, 毛娅琪, 肖智, 等. 基于扎根理论的蒙古族文创产品设计研究[J]. 包装工程, 2023, 44(08): 343-351.

[62]贠丽萍. 健康中国视域下新时代大学生心理健康及其培育研究[D]. 西安: 陕西师范大学, 2021.

[63]张培, 李楠. 核心企业开放式服务创新平台构建过程机理—基于扎根理论[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(06): 132-141.

[64]胡志宏, 曾嵘, 刘祖德. 基于系统动力学理论的事故解释方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(10): 50-55.

[65]李乃文, 郑诚, 唐水清, 等. 基于系统力学结构方程模型(SEM-SD)的高危岗位矿工习惯性违章行为干预策略研究[J]. 科技促进发展, 2019, 15(03): 281-288.

[66]牛瑞兰, 刘银芳, 伍伟. 优质干预服务对重症肺炎患者临床疗效、负性心理及住院成本的影响[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2019, 27(12): 1808-1811.

[67]高允锁, 郭敏, 康延海, 等. 海南省灾后心理危机干预服务网络的构建与运行[J]. 医学与社会, 2012, 25(10): 82-84.

[68]田水承, 景国勋. 安全管理学[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2022.

[69]洪永淼, 刘俸奇, 薛涧坡. 政府与市场心理因素的经济影响及其测度[J]. 管理世界, 2023, 39(03): 30-51.

[70]董春雨, 郭艳娜. 认识黑箱视角下相关性与因果性关系之辨析[J]. 自然辩证法研究, 2020, 36(12): 54-59.

[71]胡锦梁, 郑小华, 黄薇, 等. 四川省医疗卫生服务资源优化配置评估研究[J]. 现代预防医学, 2019, 46(13): 2393-2397.

[72]王挺昂, 张富强. 我国严格产品责任的扩张及其理性限制——以国家适度干预原则为视角[J]. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2015(05): 118-126.

[73]党秀云. 论志愿服务可持续发展的价值与基础[J]. 中国行政管理, 2019, 413(11): 118-123.

[74]郭龙健. 以人为本:后疫情背景下研究生教育治理的视角、原则与对策[J]. 学位与研究生教育, 2021, 347(10): 16-21.

[75]邵新哲, 计国君. 城市网格化管理与智慧社区协同运作机制研究——以四川省S市社区网格化管理为例[J]. 软科学, 2021, 35(02): 137-144.

中图分类号:

 X921    

开放日期:

 2024-06-20    

无标题文档

   建议浏览器: 谷歌 火狐 360请用极速模式,双核浏览器请用极速模式