- 无标题文档
查看论文信息

论文中文题名:

 城市韧性与基础设施建设水平耦合协调研究    

姓名:

 朱静文    

学号:

 18202217026    

保密级别:

 公开    

论文语种:

 chi    

学科代码:

 085236    

学科名称:

 工学 - 工程 - 工业工程    

学生类型:

 硕士    

学位级别:

 工程硕士    

学位年度:

 2021    

培养单位:

 西安科技大学    

院系:

 管理学院    

专业:

 工业工程    

研究方向:

 工业经济    

第一导师姓名:

 史玉芳    

第一导师单位:

  西安科技大学    

论文提交日期:

 2021-06-15    

论文答辩日期:

 2021-05-30    

论文外文题名:

 Research on the Integration and Coordination of Urban Advantages and Infrastructure Construction    

论文中文关键词:

 城市韧性 ; 基础设施建设水平 ; 时空分布 ; 耦合协调度    

论文外文关键词:

 Urban resilience ; infrastructure construction level ; spatial and temporal distribution ; coupling coordination scheduling    

论文中文摘要:

~城市基础设施建设是城市发展的中坚力量,是新型城镇化建设的重要实现路径。完善的基础设施建设对城市韧性水平的提升具有重要的推动作用,而城市韧性的增强也为城市基础设施建设提供了承载空间。在当前建设韧性城市上升为国家战略的时代背景下,如何推动城市韧性与基础设施建设的协调发展,实现城市韧性与基础设施建设耦合与互动,是当前研究面临的科学问题,也是未来建设韧性城市,实现可持续发展亟待解决的现实问题。
本文以中国大陆31个省级行政区的城市整体为研究对象,在构建城市韧性与基础设施建设水平评价指标体系的基础上,对我国城市韧性水平和基础设施建设水平进行评价和分析;基于耦合协调理论构建耦合协调度模型,并进行时空演化分析,利用Geoda软件对其进行Moran’s I指数空间自相关检验,从不同地理尺度上测度并分析了城市韧性与基础设施建设水平和两者之间的耦合协调关系。主要结论如下:①我国城市韧性度呈稳步增长态势,大部分省份城市韧性水平增幅明显,广东省韧性指数增幅最大达到21.80%;空间分布呈现“东部>中部>西部>东北”的格局。②基础设施建设水平总体不高但呈平稳上升态势,年均增长率为7.24%,空间分布呈现东高西低的非均衡梯度分布格局。③城市韧性与基础设施建设水平协调度总体发展态势良好,但协调层级较低,正处于由初级协调向中级协调的过渡阶段;空间分布存在明显的区域差异,形成“东强西弱,由南向北依次递减”的分布格局。④城市韧性与基础设施建设水平耦合协调度全局分布具有显著的正向相关关系,空间分布呈现出层次分明的集聚现象;局部分布呈现出显著的非均衡空间分布特征,总体空间在东部地区呈现连片分布的现象,具有较强的空间溢出效应。基于此,本文有针对性地提出了促进城市韧性与基础设施建设协调发展的策略与建议,进而为我国建设韧性城市,实现可持续发展提供理论依据和实践贡献。

论文外文摘要:

~Urban infrastructure construction is the backbone of urban development and an important path for the realization of a new type of urbanization. Complete infrastructure construction plays an important role in promoting the level of urban resilience, and the enhancement of urban resilience also provides space for urban infrastructure construction. In the context of the current era when building resilient cities has become a national strategy, how to promote the coordinated development of urban resilience and infrastructure construction, and realize the coupling and interaction between urban resilience and infrastructure construction, is a scientific problem faced by current research, and it is also a scientific issue for future construction of resilient cities. Realizing the practical problems that need to be solved urgently to achieve sustainable development.
This article takes the city as a whole in 31 province-level administrative regions in mainland China as the research object. Based on the establishment of an evaluation index system for urban resilience and infrastructure construction level, this paper evaluates and analyzes the urban resilience and infrastructure construction level of China; based on coupling coordination theoretical construction of the coupling coordination degree model, and the analysis of spatio-temporal evolution, using Geoda software to conduct Moran's I index spatial autocorrelation test, measuring and analyzing the urban resilience and infrastructure construction level and the coupling between the two from different geographic scales coordinating relations. The main conclusions are as follows:①Chinese urban resilience is increasing steadily. Most provinces have seen a significant increase in urban resilience levels, with the largest increase in the resilience index of Guangdong Province reaching 21.80%; the spatial distribution presents a pattern of "Eastern>Central>West>Northeast".②The level of infrastructure construction is generally not high but is showing a steady upward trend, with an average annual growth rate of 7.24%, and the spatial distribution presents a non-equilibrium gradient distribution pattern of high east and low west.③The overall development trend of the coordination between urban resilience and infrastructure construction level is good, but the coordination level is low, and it is in the transitional stage from primary coordination to intermediate coordination; there are obvious regional differences in spatial distribution, forming "the east is strong and the west is weak. The distribution pattern of“decreasing in order to the north”.④The global distribution of urban resilience and the level of infrastructure construction level coupling and coordination has a significant positive correlation, and the spatial distribution presents a hierarchical agglomeration phenomenon; the local distribution presents a significant non-equilibrium spatial distribution characteristic, and the overall space is connected in the eastern region. The phenomenon of patch distribution has a strong spatial spillover effect. Based on this, this article puts forward targeted strategies and suggestions to promote the coordinated development of urban resilience and infrastructure construction, so as to provide theoretical basis and practical contributions for the construction of resilient cities in my country and the realization of sustainable development.

参考文献:

[1]邵亦文,徐江.城市韧性:基于国际文献综述的概念解析[J].国际城市规划,2015,30(02):48-54.

[2]石崧.《新城市议程》视角下的中国城市总体规划转型[J].规划师,2017,33(12):5-10.

[3]Meerow S, Newell J P, Stults M.城市韧性的定义评述[J].城市规划学刊,2016(03):125-126.

[4]李亚,翟国方.我国城市灾害韧性评估及其提升策略研究[J].规划师,2017,33(08):5-11.

[5]Holling, C S.Resilience and stability of ecological system[J].Annual Review of Ecology & Systematics,1973,4(1):1-23.

[6]Berkes F, Folke C, Colding J.Linking social and ecological systems:Management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience[J].Cambridge University Press,1998.

[7]蔡建明,郭华,汪德根.国外弹性城市研究述评[J].地理科学进展,2012,31(10):1245-1255.

[8]Godschalk D R.Urban hazard mitigation: Creating resilient cities[J].Natural Hazards Review, 2003, 4(3):136-143.

[9]Klaus Thoma, Benjamin Scharte, Daniel Hiller,et al.Resilience engineering as part of security research: Definitions, concepts and science approaches[J].European Journal for Security Research,2016, 1(1):3-19.

[10]Marta S, Erik G B, Javier B,et al.Towards an urban resilience index: A Case Study in 50 Spanish Cities[J].Sustainability,2016,8(8):774.

[11]Gimenez R, Labaka L, Hernantes J.Building city resilience through collaborative networks: A literature review[C]// International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management in Mediterranean Countries. Springer, Cham, 2016.

[12]Nunes D M, Pinheiro M D, Tome A.Does a review of urban resilience allow for the support of an evolutionary concept?[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2019,244(AUG.15):422-430.

[13]Eija Meriläinen.The dual discourse of urban resilience:Robust city and self-organised neighbourhoods[J].Disasters,2020,44(1).

[14]Michel Bruneau, Andrei Reinhorn.Exploring the concept of seismic resilience for acute care facilities[J].Earthquake Spectra,2007,23(1):41-62.

[15]Susan L. Cutter,et al.A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters[J].Global Environmental Change,2008,18(4):598-606.

[16]Cimellaro G P, Renschler C, Reinhorn A M,et al.Peoples: A Framework for evaluating resilience[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering,2016,142(10).

[17]Ayyoob Sharifi.Urban resilience assessment:mapping knowledge structure and trends[J]. Sustainability,2020,12(15),5918.

[18]Sajjad M, Chan J, Chopra S S.Rethinking disaster resilience in high-density cities: Towards an urban resilience knowledge system[J].Sustainable Cities and Society,2021,69:102850.

[19]Shi Y, Zhai G, Xu L,et al.Assessment methods of urban system resilience: From the perspective of complex adaptive system theory[J].Cities,2021,112:103141.

[20]Zhang J, Zhang M, Li G .Multi-stage composition of urban resilience and the influence of pre-disaster urban functionality on urban resilience[J].Natural Hazards,2021(2):1-27.

[21]Ferrer A, AMT Thomé, Scavarda A J.Sustainable urban infrastructure: A review[J].Resources Conservation & Recycling,2018,128:360-372.

[22]Mohammed Ali Berawi.Managing sustainable infrastructure and urban development: Shaping a better future for ASEAN[J].International Journal of Technology,2018,9(7):1295-1298.

[23]Mohapatra D R.An economic analysis of urban infrastructure development project in the northern Indian city of Bharatpur[J].Growth and Change,2019,50(3):1134-1163.

[24]Koorosh Gharehbaghi, Bambang Trigunarsyah, Addil Balli.Sustainable urban development: Strategies to support the melbourne 2017-2050[J].International Journal of Strategic Engineering (IJoSE), 2020, 3(2):59-72.

[25]Schmid B .Hybrid infrastructures: The role of strategy and compromise in grassroot governance[J]. Environmental Policy and Governance,2021(1).

[26]Sun H L, Hu Y P. Research on sustainable development evaluation system of large-scale infrastructure projects based on AHP[J].Applied Mechanics & Materials,2012,174-177:2931-2935.

[27]Choi J.Stress-strain capacity analysis for the impact of natural disasters on coupled infrastructure facilities.[D].Purdue University.2015.

[28]Jung H, Son J D.Estimation of urban infrastructure demand with consideration of urban characteristics[J].Icic Express Letters Part B Applications An International Journal of Research & Surveys,2016,7:295-300.

[29]Balali V, Yaseri K, Ham Y.Algorithmic development of life-cycle assessment:Application of urban water infrastructure systems in Iran[J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering,2017,21(5):1979-1990.

[30]Mansourianfara M H, Haghshenasb H.Micro-scale sustainability assessment of infrastructure projects on urban transportation systems: Case study of azadi district, Isfahan, Iran[J].Cities,2018,72:149-159.

[31]翟长海,刘文,谢礼立.城市抗震韧性评估研究进展[J].建筑结构学报,2018,39(09):1-9.

[32]张明顺,李欢欢.气候变化背景下城市韧性评估研究进展[J].生态经济,2018,34(10):154-161.

[33]臧鑫宇,王峤.城市韧性的概念演进、研究内容与发展趋势[J].科技导报,2019,37(22):94-104.

[34]肖文涛,王鹭.韧性城市:现代城市安全发展的战略选择[J].东南学术,2019(02):89-99+246.

[35]李亚,翟国方.我国城市灾害韧性评估及其提升策略研究[J].规划师,2017,33(08):5-11.

[36]廖茂林,李菲菲,高佳琳.低碳韧性城市:可持续发展的必由之路[J].城市,2017(11):60-66.

[37]李刚,徐波.中国城市韧性水平的测度及提升路径[J].山东科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2018,20(02):83-89+116.

[38]彭翀,林樱子,顾朝林.长江中游城市网络结构韧性评估及其优化策略[J].地理研究, 2018,37(06):1193-1207.

[39]修春亮,魏冶,王绮.基于“规模—密度—形态”的大连市城市韧性评估[J].地理学报, 2018,73(12):2315-2328.

[40]张明斗,冯晓青.长三角城市群内各城市的城市韧性与经济发展水平的协调性对比研究[J].城市发展研究,2019,26(01):82-91.

[41]缪惠全,王乃玉,汪英俊,林陪晖.基于灾后恢复过程解析的城市韧性评价体系[J].自然灾害学报,2021,30(01):10-27.

[42]龚定勇,蒋爱民.基础设施建设与城市经济增长的关系[J].城市问题,2004(01):46-50.

[43]曹琳剑,王杰.京津冀城市化与基础设施建设耦合演进分析—基于适宜性理论[J].建筑经济, 2018,39(09):98-104.

[44]廖茂林,许召元,胡翠,喻崇武.基础设施投资是否还能促进经济增长?—基于1994-2016年省际面板数据的实证检验[J].管理世界,2018,34(05):63-73.

[45]王晓娟,田慧,孙小军.交通基础设施建设对省份进口的影响—来自公路与铁路里程数的证据[J].宏观经济研究,2019,252(11):158-165.

[46]马荣,郭立宏,李梦欣.新时代我国新型基础设施建设模式及路径研究[J].经济学家,2019(10):58-65.

[47]马昱,邱菀华,王昕宇.城市基础设施、技术创新与区域经济发展—基于中介效应与面板门槛模型分析[J].工业技术经济,2019,38(08):116-123.

[48]陈智颖,钱崇秀,陈苗臻.城镇化、基础设施建设与区域均衡发展—基于2003-2017年省际面板数据的实证检验[J].云南财经大学学报,2020,36(02):19-31.

[49]张灿.河北省城市基础设施建设水平评价研究[D].河北地质大学,2016.

[50]陈银娥,孙琼.中国基础设施发展水平测算及影响因素—基于省级面板数据的实证研究[J].经济地理,2016,36(08):23-30.

[51]宋贤萍.我国城市基础设施建设可持续发展水平评价研究[D].重庆大学,2016.

[52]田时中,占沁嫣,孙阳贯南.长江经济带省域基础设施发展水平比较研究—来自11省市2008-2015年的面板证据[J].长春理工大学学报(社会科学版),2017,30(03):92-97.

[53]程艺.基于层次分析法的河北省城市基础设施评价指标体系研究[J].西部皮革,2018,40(07):94-95.

[54]史富文.城市基础设施发展水平评价研究[J].工程经济,2019,29(12):64-68.

[55]周利敏,原伟麒.迈向韧性城市的灾害治理—基于多案例研究[J].经济社会体制比较, 2017(05):22-33.

[56]艾伯特·赫希曼.经济发展战略[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1991.

[57]蔡孝箴.城市经济学(修订版)[M].南开大学出版社,1998.

[58]李志军.中国农村基础设施配置调控研究[D].东北师范大学,2001.

[59]Holling C S.Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience[J].Engineering Within Ecological Constraints,1996:31-44.

[60]Wildgen J, Wagner F.The resilient city:How modern cities recover from disaster, edited by Lawrence J. Vale and Thomas J. Campanella (Eds.)[J].Journal of Urban Affairs,2007,29(5):548-550.

[61]Brendan Gleeson.Waking from the dream: An Australian perspective on urban resilience[J].Urban Studies,2008,45(13):2653-2668.

[62]周倩,刘德林.长三角城市群城市韧性与城镇化水平耦合协调发展研究[J].水土保持研究, 2020,27(04):286-292.

[63]陈韶清,夏安桃.长江中游城市群城市韧性与规模关系的时空分析[J].湖南师范大学自然科学学报, 2020,43(03):10-17.

[64]张明斗,李维露.东北地区城市韧性水平的空间差异与收敛性研究[J].工业技术经济, 2020,39(05):3-12.

[65]程皓,阳国亮,纪晓君.中国十大城市群城市韧性与环境压力脱钩关系研究[J].统计与决策, 2019,35(07):79-83.

[66]冯洁瑶,刘耀龙,王军,等.经济发展水平、环境压力对城市韧性的影响—基于山西省11个地级市面板数据[J].生态经济,2020,36(09):101-106+163.

[67]张慧,刘耀龙,冯洁瑶.城市化质量、城市韧性对洪涝灾害风险的影响—基于山西11个地级市面板数据[J].经济问题,2020(04):114-120.

[68]朱金鹤,孙红雪.中国三大城市群城市韧性时空演进与影响因素研究[J].软科学,2020,34(02):72-79.

[69]白立敏,修春亮,冯兴华,等.中国城市韧性综合评估及其时空分异特征[J].世界地理研究, 2019,28(06):77-87.

[70]许兆丰,田杰芳,张靖.防灾视角下城市韧性评价体系及优化策略[J].中国安全科学学报, 2019,29(03):1-7.

[71]唐晓灵,张青.城市基础设施空间配置效率评价模型及实证研究[J].现代城市研究, 2019(05):122-128.

[72]荣月静,张慧,赵显富.基于多因素综合评价法的长三角地区城市基础设施建设水平研究[J].科技通报,2016,32(02):104-110.

[73]王晓楠,孔凡文.区域经济发展质量与基础设施建设水平协调性评价分析[J].建筑经济, 2017,38(10):11-16.

[74]向鹏成,曹园园.城市基础设施供给与城市人口匹配度研究—以重庆市为例[J].人口与发展, 2016,22(02):33-38.

[75]姜旭,卢新海.长江中游城市群城镇化与人居环境耦合协调的时空特征研究[J].中国土地科学, 2020,34(01):25-33.

[76]白玉娟,洪增林,薛旭平,石卫.关中平原城市群土地集约利用与生态文明建设耦合性研究[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(03):272-280.

[77]张明斗,冯晓青.中国城市韧性度综合评价[J].城市问题,2018(10):27-36.

[78]张可云,裴相烨.中国区域协调发展水平测度—基于省级数据分析[J].郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2019,52(06):29-34+125.

[79]贾琦,运迎霞,尹泽凯.城市群土利地用效益与城镇化水平的时空耦合分析—我国三大城市群的实证分析[J].现代城市研究,2014(08):9-13.

[80]李迅.防控重大风险建设韧性城市[J].城市发展研究,2020,27(04):1-6.

[81]赵冬月,施波,陈以琴,等.协同管理对城市韧性增强机制的影响[J].管理评论, 2016,28(08):207-214.

[82]王辉,苑莹,刘帆,等.辽宁省人口、经济与环境协调发展的空间自相关分析[J].人口与发展, 2013,19(03):29-37.

[83]申韬,李卉卉.“一带一路”沿线国家金融生态环境、经济增长耦合集聚效应分析[J].南洋问题研究,2018(02):46-61.

中图分类号:

 F282    

开放日期:

 2021-06-15    

无标题文档

   建议浏览器: 谷歌 火狐 360请用极速模式,双核浏览器请用极速模式