论文中文题名: | 中医药企业价值评估模型的构建与应用研究——以YL药业为例 |
姓名: | |
学号: | 19302220070 |
保密级别: | 公开 |
论文语种: | chi |
学科代码: | 125300 |
学科名称: | 管理学 - 会计 |
学生类型: | 硕士 |
学位级别: | 管理学硕士 |
学位年度: | 2022 |
培养单位: | 西安科技大学 |
院系: | |
专业: | |
研究方向: | 财务管理理论与实务 |
第一导师姓名: | |
第一导师单位: | |
论文提交日期: | 2022-06-17 |
论文答辩日期: | 2022-06-07 |
论文外文题名: | Research on the Construction and Application of Value Assessment Model for Chinese Medicine Enterprises: A Case Study of YL Pharmaceutical |
论文中文关键词: | |
论文外文关键词: | Chinese medicine enterprises ; Value assessment ; Comprehensive valuation model |
论文中文摘要: |
在新冠肺炎疫情背景下,中医药在抗疫中效果显著,进而推进中药行业的复兴。与此同时,“十四五规划”中亦提出:大力发展中医药行业,号召中药新药创新。在该背景下,如何科学准确地评估企业价值,使中药企业找准定位,提升企业价值,成为重点关注。为此,本文在对国内外企业价值评估、价值评估方法以及适用性的理论与应用进行探讨的基础上,运用层次分析和熵值法等构建了中药企业综合估值模型,应用了YL药业案例数据实践了该模型,并检验其适用性。 主要研究工作及结论:(1)对国内外企业价值评估及方法适用性相关研究进行归纳总结,介绍综合估值法。研究表明:目前企业价值评估方法主要分为成本法、市场法和收益法,本文为完整体现企业价值,综合考虑企业过去、现在和未来,采用AHP法和熵值法结合的综合估值法。另外,因自由现金流折现法和市盈率法相对成熟,选择这两种方法将辅助验证所构估值模型的适用性。(2)深入分析中药行业的发展状况和特征,建立中药企业综合估值模型。研究表明:该模型是通过筛选成本、市场、收益三维度及九个指标建立企业价值评估指标体系,运用AHP法与层次分析法,结合目标企业近五年股本总和及年末收盘价均值所构建的。(3)将综合估值模型应用于YL药业中,并结合P/E模型和FCFF估值模型加以验证综合估值模型的适用性,并对中药业提出相关建议。研究表明:P/E模型低估YL药业价值,综合估值模型相比FCFF估值法更能够全面反映企业的整体价值,总结出综合估值模型高于市场价值的原因在于YL药业的创新力、种植基地等因素,从而对中药业的价值提升提出可行性建议。 本文进一步丰富了中药企业估值研究成果,对YL药业价值评估的单个案例研究也是对中医药企业价值评估方法研究的相互补充,为评估中医药企业价值研究提供了理论依据与借鉴。 |
论文外文摘要: |
Against the backdrop of the new pneumonia epidemic, Chinese medicine has been effective in fighting the epidemic and promoting the revival of the Chinese medicine industry. At the same time, the 14th Five-Year Plan also proposes to vigorously develop the Chinese medicine industry and calls for new drug innovation in Chinese medicine. In this context, how to scientifically and accurately assess the enterprise value, so that Chinese medicine enterprises can find the right position and enhance the enterprise value has become a key concern. To this end, based on the theories and applications of enterprise value assessment, value assessment methods and applicability at home and abroad, this paper constructs a comprehensive valuation model for Chinese medicine enterprises using hierarchical analysis and entropy method, applies YL Pharmaceutical case data to practice the model and tests its applicability. Main research work and conclusions: (1) summarize the domestic and foreign research related to enterprise value assessment and method applicability, and introduce the integrated valuation method. The research shows that: the current enterprise value assessment methods are mainly divided into cost method, market method and income method, and this paper adopts the integrated valuation method combining AHP method and entropy value method for the complete embodiment of enterprise value and comprehensive consideration of enterprise's past, present and future. In addition, since the discounted free cash flow method and the price-earnings ratio method are relatively mature, the selection of these two methods will assist in validating the constructed valuation model. (2) In-depth analysis of the development status and characteristics of the Chinese medicine industry and the establishment of a comprehensive valuation model for Chinese medicine enterprises. The study shows that the model is constructed by screening three dimensions of cost, market and revenue and nine indicators to establish an enterprise value assessment index system, applying the AHP method and hierarchical analysis method, and combining the total equity and the average value of year-end closing price of the target enterprises in the past five years. (3) The comprehensive valuation model is applied to YL Pharmaceutical, and the applicability of the comprehensive valuation model is verified by combining the P/E model and FCFF valuation model, and relevant recommendations are made to YL Pharmaceutical. The study shows that the P/E model underestimates the value of YL Pharmaceutical, and the integrated valuation model can reflect the overall value of the company more comprehensively than the FCFF valuation method. It concludes that the reason for the integrated valuation model being higher than the market value is the innovation power and cultivation base of YL Pharmaceutical, and thus makes feasible suggestions for the value enhancement of Chinese Medicine Industry. This paper further enriches the valuation research results of Chinese medicine enterprises, and the single case study on the valuation of YL Pharmaceuticals is also a mutual complement to the research on the valuation methods of Chinese medicine enterprises, which provides a theoretical basis and reference for the valuation research of Chinese medicine enterprises. |
参考文献: |
[1]Fisher I. The Impatience Theory of Interest[J].American Economic Review,1913,3(3)610-618. [3]Kester W.C. Today's options for tomorrow's growth. Harvard Business Review[J].1984,62:153-160. [8]埃斯瓦斯达莫达兰等.估值:难点、解决方案及相关案例[M].机械工业出版社,2013. [14]Shimin Chen.Operating Income, Redual Income and EVA: Which Metric is More Relevant?[J].Journal of Managerial Issues,1997(13):231-322. [20]Benjamin Cohen, Michal Neubert. How Do Corporate Valuation Methods Reflect the Stock Price Value of SaaS Sofware Firms[J]. ISM Journal of International Business.2019,3(1):9-15 [21]孙琳.农业上市公司内在价值与股票价格之间的关系研究[D].内蒙古农业大学,2009. [22]王未卿,洪贤,邓静涛.对Black-Scholes期权定价模型的修正及检验[J].财会月刊,2012(33):56-59. [23]杨易.基于实物期权法的新三板企业股权价值评估研究[J].贵州师范大学学报(自然 [24]薛永刚,张明丽.基于神经网络和实物期权的新药研发项目估值模型研究[J].中国新 [25] 李正伟.现金流量折现法视角下企业价值评估体系研究[J].财会研究,2016(02):57-59+67. [26]胡靖宣.基于生命周期视角下企业价值评估方法研究——以中国移动为例[D].云南财经大学,2016. [27]吴东晟.我国企业价值评估方法比较及其发展趋势研究[J].科学咨询(科技·管理),2018(10):12-13. [28] 赵振洋,张渼.科创板生物医药企业价值评估研究——基于修正的FCFF估值模型[J]. [29]鄢琼叶.基于EVA模型和B-S模型组合的成长期高新技术企业价值评估研究[D].江 [30]伍丹.公司高管持股与企业价值相关性研究[D].西南财经大学,2010. [31]刘艳玲.高新技术企业价值评估方法的选择与应用——基于生命周期的视角[J].会计 [32]孙若璇.基于企业价值评估视角谈成长期企业财务管理战略[J].财会研究,2012(08): [33]苑秀娥,魏冬梅,刘志彬.基于实物期权法的风力发电企业评估研究[J].会计之友,2014 [34]李冬.传播与文化类企业价值评估方法研究[J].中国资产评估,2015(2):36-43. [35]郭建峰,王丹,樊云,刘樱.互联网企业价值评估体系研究——基于实物期权模型的分 析[J].价格理论与实践,2017(07):153-156. [36]汪冬梅,姚雅莉.生命周期视角下资本结构与企业价值的关系研究—来自我国生物医 药业的经验数据[J].中国资产评估,2017(04):20-25. [37]孔晓旭,郭毅.引入社会责任指标的企业价值评估探微[J].财会月刊,2017(19):67-74. [38]宋光辉,孙影.基于行业市盈率的股票估值APT及有效性分析[J].财会月刊2017(29):116-121. [39]刘佳颖.基于用户价值的初创互联网企业估值研究[D].北京交通大学,2019. [40]袁明哲,潘爱玲.实用企业价值评估模型:建模与实证[J].经济经纬,2016(1):96-100. [41]李尧.市盈率和市净率估值有效性实证比较[J].时代金融,2016(29):255. [42]韩兴国,刘瑞芳.基于自由现金流量折现模型的上市公司价值评估——以伊利股份为 [43]潘声海.现金流折现法在轻资产公司并购估值中的运用[J].财会学习,2018(13):203- [44]陈欣欣,郭涛.基于现金流量的温氏股份评估模型[J].中国农业会计,2019,(11)33-34. [45]唐圆圆.基于自由现金流量的企业价值评估:以索芙特公司为例[J].江苏商论,2020(4):95-98.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-0061.2020.04.026. [46]付东鹏,王艳莎.基于自由现金流量法的HKWS企业价值评估[J].现代经济信 [47]韩雪,刘尧远.修正市盈率法在拟上市公司估值中的应用[J].财会通讯,2013(35):56-58. [48]黄鹭苇.绝对估值法和相对估值法比较——基于市盈率法和自由现金流模型对股票 的实证分析[J].时代金融,2014(2):107-108. [49]胡秋菊.基于市场法的企业IPO定价研究[D].东南大学,2017 [50]刘欣宜.企业价值评估中市场法的参数选择研究[J].现代商业,2017(5):98-99. [51]郭雨露.基于市盈率对比模型度量缺乏流动性折扣的研究[J].现代商贸工业,2018(9): [52]橹楠.医疗器械行业企业估值方法分析[J].经济研究导刊,2021(1):90-92.DOI:10.39 69/j.issn.1673-291X.2021.01.029. [53]孟洁莹.基于PCA-LASSO方法的行业市盈率预测及影响因素分析[J].中国商论,2021 (9):58-60.DOI:10.19699/j.cnki.issn2096-0298.2021.09.058. [54]李刚.EVA企业价值评估体系及其应用——以华为公司为例[J].财会月刊,2017(22):8 [55]林振民.基于经济增加值(EVA)的企业价值管理分析[J].现代国企研究,2017(20):58. [56]谢喻江.基于EVA的成长期高新技术企业价值评估[J].财会通讯,2017. [57]史吉霞.基于EVA阿里巴巴的企业价值评估研究[D].沈阳理工大学2018. [58]顾炎勐.基于EVA模型下的医药企业价值评估——以九芝堂为例[J].纳税,2018(13): |
中图分类号: | F426.7 |
开放日期: | 2022-06-17 |