股权质押作为一种融资成本低、速度快、不影响控制权的新型融资方式，深受上市公司控股股东的青睐。然而，随着股权质押的程度不断加深，潜在的风险也逐渐凸显，一旦股价异常波动，便有可能产生股价崩盘风险甚至控制权转移风险，从而对公司造成负面影响。那么控股股东为何选择股权质押这一方式？股权质押行为会对公司产生怎样的风险和经济后果？都是亟待分析的问题。因此，控股股东股权质押行为的动因及经济后果值得进一步深究。

基于此，本文选取煤炭行业股权质押比例第一位的上市公司美锦能源作为研究对象，聚焦美锦能源控股股东的股权质押行为。本文在梳理股权质押相关文献的基础上，结合委托代理理论、信号传递理论以及信息不对称理论，运用案例分析法剖析美锦能源控股股东进行股权质押的真实动因，并结合事件研究法、托宾Q值以及熵值法对股权质押产生的经济后果进行深入分析。研究发现：第一，在动因方面，美锦能源控股股东最初进行股权质押是为了在维持控制权的基础上融得资金支撑其发展，然而随着股权质押比例的不断提升，增强了控股股东进行利益侵占的动机。第二，在经济后果方面，美锦能源控股股东高频率且大规模的股权质押行为给公司带来了诸多不良的经济后果，从资金流向看，美锦能源控股股东通过股权质押融得的资金流向了自身以及上市公司，可能存在利益侵占的风险；从短期市场效应看，股权质押行为向市场传递了消极信号，导致美锦能源股价异常波动；从公司绩效看，股权质押行为对美锦能源的综合绩效产生负面影响；从公司价值看，股权质押行为对美锦能源托宾Q值造成不利影响，最终使得美锦能源面临较为严重的财务风险。为了应对股权质押产生的不良经济后果，本文针对公司、监管以及投资者三个层面提出相关建议，以防范股权质押带来的风险，同时为其他存在股权质押行为的上市公司起到一定的借鉴和警示作用。

As a new financing method with lower financing cost, faster speed and no influence on control rights, equity pledge is favored by the controlling shareholders of listed companies. However, with the deepening of the degree of equity pledge, the potential risks are gradually highlighted. Once the stock price fluctuates abnormally, there may be the risk of stock price collapse or even the risk of control transfer, which will have a negative impact on the company. why do they prefer this approach? What are the risks and economic consequences of this choice? These are pressing issues must be analyzed. Therefore, the motivation and economic consequences of the controlling shareholder's equity pledge are worthy of further study.

Based on this, this paper selects MJNY, the listed company with the highest proportion of equity pledge in the coal industry, as the research object, focuses on the equity pledge behavior of its controlling shareholders. On the basis of sorting out the relevant literature on equity pledge, this paper combines Principal-agent Theory, Signal Transmission Theory and Information Asymmetry Theory, uses case analysis method to analyze the real motivation of MJNY's controlling shareholder for equity pledge, and combines Event study, Tobin's Q and Entropy method make an in-depth analysis of the economic consequences of equity pledge. The research found: First, in terms of motivation, the controlling shareholder of MJNY initially pledged equity to raise funds to support its development on the basis of maintaining control, however, with the continuous increase of the proportion of equity pledge, the motivation of the controlling shareholders to usurp their interests is enhanced. Second, in terms of economic consequences, the high-frequency and large-scale equity pledge by the controlling shareholders of MJNY have brought many adverse economic consequences to the company. Through the capital flow, it can be found that the funds raised by the controlling shareholders of MJNY through equity pledge flow to themselves and the listed companies, which may lead to the risk of benefit encroachment. From the perspective of short-term market effects, the equity pledge is a negative signal to the market, leading to the abnormal fluctuation of MJNY's stock price; from the perspective of company performance, the behavior of equity pledge has a negative impact on the comprehensive performance of MJNY; from the perspective of company's value, the equity pledge has an adverse impact on the Tobin's Q of MJNY, which eventually made MJNY face more serious financial risks. This paper puts forward relevant suggestions for companies, regulators and investors in order to prevent the potential risks of equity pledge, and at the same time to provide certain reference and warning for other listed companies with equity pledge.

[1]La Porta Rafael, Lopez‐De‐Silanes Florencio, Shleifer Andrei. Corporate Ownership Around the World[J]. The Journal of Finance, 1999, 54(2): 471-517.

[2]Friedman Eric, Johnson Simon, Mitton Todd. Propping and tunneling[J]. Journal of Comparative Economics, 2003, 31(4): 732-750.

[3]Peng Winnie Qian, Wei K.C. John, Yang Zhishu. Tunneling or propping: Evidence from connected transactions in China[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2011, 17(2): 306-325.

[4]Xu Jingjing, Huang Haijie. Pay more or pay less? The impact of controlling shareholders' share pledging on firms' dividend payouts[J]. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 2021, 65: 101493.

[5]Cheng Zijian, Liu Zhangxin (Frank), Sun Yupu. Share pledging and financial constraints in China[J]. Accounting & Finance, 2020, 61(3): 4147-4189.

[6]Li Yanxi, Ouyang Shanshan. Do controlling shareholders share pledging affect goodwill impairment? Evidence from China[J]. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 2021, 29(5): 793-822.

[7]Liu Jintao. Research on the Influence Mechanism of Stock Pledge of Controlling Shareholders on Stock Price Fluctuation[J]. Academic Journal of Business & Management, 2020, 2(1): 36-43.

[8]Lou Fang, Wang Jiwei, Yuan Hongqi. Causes and consequences of corporate asset exchanges by listed companies in China[J]. International Review of Economics and Finance, 2014, 31(2): 205-217.

[9]Lim Byungkwon, Park Soonhong. Insiders’ Share Pledges and Stock Price Crash Risk[J]. The Korean Journal of Financial Management, 2019, 36(2): 173-207.

[10]Lu Hengzhen, Zhu Xiaoyu, Wang Jianli,Yick Ho Yin. Share pledge transactions as an investor sentiment indicator - Evidence from China[J]. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 2021, 82(4): 230-238.

[11]Zhou Jingting, Li Wanli, Yan Ziqiao, Lyu Huaili. Controlling shareholder share pledging and stock price crash risk: Evidence from China[J]. International Review of Financial Analysis, 2021, 77: 101839.

[12]Zhao Wanlong, Zhang Wei, Xiong Xiong, Zou Gaofeng. Share pledges, tone of earnings communication conferences, and market reaction: evidence from China[J]. Accounting & Finance, 2019, 59(5): 2817-2853.

[13]Dou Ying, Masulis W Ronald, Zein Jason. Shareholder Wealth Consequences of Insider Pledging of Company Stock as Collateral for Personal Loans[J]. The Review of Financial Studies, 2019, 32(12): 4810-4854.

[14]Ronald Anderson, Michael Puleo. Insider Share-Pledging and Equity Risk[J]. Journal of Financial Services Research, 2020, 58(1): 1-25.

[15]Ouyang Caiyue, Wang Xin, Xiong Jiacai. Do Controlling Shareholders Who Pledged Their Shares Affect Sustainable Development? An Investigation Based on the Perspective of Corporate Innovation[J]. Sustainability, 2019, 11(10): 2754.

[16]Park Soonhong, Lim Byungkwon, Kim Hyeon Sook. The Effect of Managerial Share Pledges on the Cost of Debt[J]. Korean Journal of Financial Studies, 2021,50(6): 617-650.

[17]Li Michelle, Liu Chelse, Scott Tom. Share pledges and firm value[J]. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 2019, 55: 192-205.

[18]Xu Hongmei. Share Pledging and Corporate Default Risk: Evidence from the Chinese Stock Market[J]. Journal of Finance and Accounting, 2021, 9(3): 93-100.

[19]Bozec Yves, Laurin Claude. Large Shareholder Entrenchment and Performance: Empirical Evidence from Canada[J]. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 2008, 35(1-2): 25-49.

[20]Li Guoping. The pervasiveness and severity of tunneling by controlling shareholders in China[J]. China Economic Review, 2010, 21(2): 310-323.

[21]Badertscher Brad A., Katz Sharon P., Rego Sonja O.. The separation of ownership and control and corporate tax avoidance[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2013, 56(2-3): 228-250.

[22]Barka Zeineb, Hamza Taher. The effect of large controlling shareholders on equity prices in France: monitoring or entrenchment?[J]. Journal of Management and Governance, 2020, 24(3): 769-798.

[23]Li Fengchao, Zhang Xing, Ortiz Jaime. Linkages between share pledging, stock price risk and profitability: Evidence from the P.R. China.[J]. PlOS ONE, 2021, 16(11): e0260040.

[24]Rajhans Rajni Kant. Pledging and firm performance: Evidence from Indian firms[J]. Asia Pacific Management Review, 2021, 26(5): 1-9.

[25]Hu Jun, Long Wenbin, Luo Le, Peng Yuanhuai. Share pledging and optimism in analyst earnings forecasts: Evidence from China[J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2021, 132: 106245.

[26]王新红, 张行. 上市公司股权质押现状探究[J]. 财会通讯, 2016, 37(31): 40-43.

[27]王亚茹, 赵耀, 乔贵涛. 控股股东股权质押对权益资本成本的影响[J]. 财会月刊, 2018, 39(21): 59-68.

[28]林艳, 魏连宾, 李炜. 控股股东股权质押、股权性质与公司绩效研究[J]. 商业研究, 2018, 61(2): 50-56.

[29]张涛涛, 李秉祥, 祝珊. 股权质押、内部控制与企业社会责任[J]. 会计之友, 2020, 38(8): 80-86.

[30]艾大力, 王斌. 论大股东股权质押与上市公司财务: 影响机理与市场反应[J]. 北京工商大学学报(社会科学版), 2012, 27(4): 72-76.

[31]徐寿福, 贺学会, 陈晶萍. 股权质押与大股东双重择时动机[J]. 财经研究, 2016, 42(6): 74-86.

[32]廖珂, 崔宸瑜, 谢德仁. 控股股东股权质押与上市公司股利政策选择[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 61(4): 172-189.

[33]杜丽贞, 马越, 陆通. 中国民营上市公司股权质押动因及纾解策略研究[J]. 宏观经济研究, 2019, 65(7): 148-160.

[34]滕晓梅, 祝婧然, 周倩倩. 房地产企业最终控制人股权质押对上市公司价值的侵占效应[J]. 财会月刊, 2016, 37(32): 21-24.

[35]李瑞涛, 酒莉莉. 控股股东股权质押会“诱发”上市公司违规吗?[J]. 产业经济评论, 2018, 6(1): 95-116.

[36]陈泽艺, 李常青, 黄忠煌. 股权质押、股权激励与大股东资金占用[J]. 南方金融, 2018, 40(3): 23-32.

[37]柯艳蓉, 李玉敏. 控股股东股权质押、投资效率与公司期权价值[J]. 经济管理, 2019, 41(12): 123-139.

[38]胡凯, 漆圣桥. 上市公司大股东股权质押是否损害了中小投资者利益？[J]. 兰州大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 48(1): 82-92.

[39]党宏欣. 控股股东股权质押、掏空与公司财务困境[J]. 财会通讯, 2022, 43(3): 61-64+78.

[40]谢德仁, 郑登津, 崔宸瑜. 控股股东股权质押是潜在的“地雷”吗?——基于股价崩盘风险视角的研究[J]. 管理世界, 2016, 32(5): 128-140+188.

[41]李常青, 幸伟. 控股股东股权质押与上市公司信息披露[J]. 统计研究, 2017, 34(12): 75-86.

[42]程飞, 张庆君. 控股股东股权质押、股票增持与股价波动[J].南方金融, 2018, 40(11): 49-58.

[43]夏常源, 贾凡胜. 控股股东股权质押与股价崩盘：“实际伤害”还是“情绪宣泄”[J].南开管理评论, 2019, 22(5): 165-177.

[44]邵剑兵, 费宝萱. 控股股东股权质押与股价崩盘风险——基于公司控制权转移视角[J]. 商业研究, 2020, 63(12): 110-123.

[45]杨青, 叶莹莹, 沈红波. 股权质押对企业风险的杠杆效应[J]. 上海金融, 2020, 41(10): 37-48.

[46]连玉君, 刘畅. 质押新规、股价崩盘风险与公司价值[J]. 中山大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 61(05): 182-196.

[47]卜华, 杨宇晴, 张银杰. 控股股东股权质押、股权集中度与股价崩盘风险[J]. 会计之友, 2020, 38(8): 87-94.

[48]王晓彦, 代晶晶, 胡德宝. 大股东股权质押对股价崩盘风险的影响研究[J]. 宁夏社会科学, 2020, 39(6): 118-124.

[49]郝项超, 梁琪. 最终控制人股权质押损害公司价值么?[J].会计研究, 2009, 30(7): 57-63+96.

[50]郑国坚, 林东杰, 林斌. 大股东股权质押、占款与企业价值[J]. 管理科学学报, 2014, 17(9): 72-87.

[51]李洪涛. 上市公司大股东股权质押对公司价值的影响——以华映科技为例[J]. 财会通讯, 2017, 38(5): 64-68.

[52]谢露, 王超恩. 控股股东股权质押与上市公司过度投资[J]. 上海金融, 2017, 38(7): 43-49.

[53]侯婧, 朱莲美. 控股股东股权质押与公司非效率投资行为[J]. 财会月刊, 2018, 39(18): 81-89.

[54]陈丹, 王珊珊, 刘畅. 控股股东股权质押对企业价值的影响研究——基于研发投入视角[J]. 工业技术经济, 2020, 39(9): 130-135.

[55]凌暄, 王志涛. 成长机会门槛下股权质押与企业价值研究[J]. 财会通讯, 2020, 41(21): 77-81.

[56]庄俊明, 林永佳, 于守金. 控股股东股权质押与公司战略激进度[J]. 管理现代化, 2022, 42(01): 40-47.

[57]胡进. 控制权与现金流权分离下的上市公司成长性实证研究[J]. 统计与决策, 2013, 29(24): 191-193

[58]王新红, 张行, 薛泽蓉. 大股东股权质押对公司绩效的影响研究——基于内部控制的调节作用[J]. 会计之友, 2018, 36(10): 58-64.

[59]夏婷, 闻岳春, 袁鹏. 大股东股权质押影响公司价值的路径分析[J]. 山西财经大学学报, 2018, 40(8): 93-108.

[60]李益娟, 张英丽. 大股东控制、股权质押与企业价值[J]. 财会月刊, 2020, 41(14): 15-22.

[61]朱文莉, 陈鑫鑫, 阚立娜. 股权质押如何影响上市公司价值[J]. 财会月刊, 2020, 41 (02): 48-55.

[62]王斌, 蔡安辉, 冯洋. 大股东股权质押、控制权转移风险与公司业绩[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2013, 33(7): 1762-1773.

[63]方杰, 杨超颖, 方重. 上市公司股权质押的风险探析[J]. 清华金融评论, 2016, 4(12): 77-81.

[64]胡旭微, 李平娜. 上市公司大股东股权质押融资经济后果研究综述[J]. 经营与管理, 2017, 35(10): 14-16.

[65]夏一丹, 肖思瑶, 夏云峰. 大股东股权质押影响了公司业绩吗——来自沪深A股上市公司的经验证据[J]. 财经科学, 2019, 63(10): 59-70.

[66]常利民. 控股股东股权质押与公司业绩预告行为[J]. 财经论丛, 2020, 36(9): 74-83.

[67]曹海敏, 张晓茜. 控股股东股权质押与公司业绩关系研究——基于企业生命周期视角[J]. 会计之友, 2021, 39(20): 56-62.

[68]刘娅, 李欣, 赵淑鹏. 机构持股、大股东股权质押与企业绩效[J]. 财会通讯, 2021, 42 (22): 41-43.

[69]何威风, 刘怡君, 吴玉宇. 大股东股权质押和企业风险承担研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2018, 33(05): 110-122.

[70]黄登仕, 黄禹舜, 周嘉南. 控股股东股权质押影响上市公司“高送转”吗?[J]. 管理科学学报, 2018, 21(12): 18-36+94.

[71]李晓庆, 杨帆. 控股股东股权质押经济后果的影响机理分析[J]. 财会月刊, 2020, 41(20): 146- 151.

[72]刘铭. 大股东股权质押与上市公司财务重述[J]. 财会通讯, 2021, 42(10): 66-71.

[73]王新红, 曹帆. 控股股东股权质押是否增加企业的财务风险?——来自民营企业的经验证据[J]. 南京审计大学学报, 2021, 18(3): 42-50.

[74]张原, 宋丙沙. 控股股东股权质押、公司治理与财务风险[J]. 财会月刊,2020, 41(20): 152-160.

[75]吴静, 袁芳英. 股权质押、公司治理与财务危机预警[J]. 财会通讯, 2020, 41(12): 45-49.

[76]刘艳霞, 祁怀锦, 曹修琴. 控股股东股权质押与公司财务状况：“掠夺之手”抑或“扶持之手”[J]. 经济与管理, 2021, 35(4): 56-63.