- 无标题文档
查看论文信息

论文中文题名:

 高管环保认知、研发投入与企业绿色创新绩效——兼检验环境不确定性与企业透明度的调节作用    

姓名:

 李盼    

学号:

 21202098047    

保密级别:

 公开    

论文语种:

 chi    

学科代码:

 120201    

学科名称:

 管理学 - 工商管理 - 会计学    

学生类型:

 硕士    

学位级别:

 管理学硕士    

学位年度:

 2024    

培养单位:

 西安科技大学    

院系:

 管理学院    

专业:

 工商管理    

研究方向:

 资本运营与公司理财    

第一导师姓名:

 袁显平    

第一导师单位:

 西安科技大学    

论文提交日期:

 2024-06-13    

论文答辩日期:

 2024-06-07    

论文外文题名:

 Executives' Environmental Perception, R&D Investment and Corporate Green Innovation Performance:With A Discussion on the Moderating effect of Environmental Uncertainty And Information Transparency    

论文中文关键词:

 高管环保认知 ; 绿色创新绩效 ; 研发投入 ; 环境不确定性 ; 企业透明度    

论文外文关键词:

 Executives' Environmental Perception ; R&D Investment ; Green Innovation Performance ; Environmental Uncertainty ; Information Transparency    

论文中文摘要:

绿色发展已成为全球范围内的共识和趋势,也是协调生态环境保护和经济发展矛盾的新质生产力。高管团队对环境保护的认知程度和对绿色创新的重视程度,直接影响企业的战略决策和行动方向。本文以中国A股上市公司2011-2022年的数据为研究样本,结合高层梯队、注意力基础观等理论,构建负二项回归模型,实证检验了高管环保认知对企业不同形式的绿色创新绩效的影响,在此过程中着重考察了研发投入作为门槛变量对实质性绿色创新绩效的影响效果。调节效应检验中,考察了环境不确定性和企业透明度两者对不同形式绿色创新绩效的影响效果。最后本文依据企业产权性质和是否属于重污染行业进行了异质性分析,检验了在不同条件下高管环保认知对绿色创新绩效的影响情况。

主要研究成果和结论如下:(1)高管环保认知能够有效促进企业绿色创新绩效,但主要作用于策略性绿色创新绩效,经过一系列稳健性检验后,该结论依旧成立;而高管环保认知对于实质性绿色创新绩效促进作用仅在较高研发投入的情况下显现。(2)环境不确定性在高管环保认知对实质性绿色创新绩效的影响中无显著调节作用,但可以促进其对策略性绿色创新绩效的正向影响。(3)企业透明度对高管环保认知与策略性绿色创新绩效具有显著负向调节作用,对实质性绿色创新调节作用不显著。(4)异质性分析的实证结果显示,在非国有企业和重污染行业企业中,高管环保认知仅能促进企业的策略性绿色创新,对实质性绿色创新绩效的促进作用有限。

本文拓展了高层梯队理论和注意力基础观的研究边界,研究了高管团队认知层面如何驱动企业绿色创新活动。此外,探讨了环境不确定性和企业透明度对绿色创新形式的影响,进一步分析了它们之间的调节作用。本研究为企业如何有效实现绿色创新绩效提供了有益的启示和建议,具有一定的理论和实践意义。

论文外文摘要:

Green development has become a global consensus and trend, as well as a new productive force for reconciling the contradiction between ecological environment protection and economic development. The top management team's awareness of environmental protection and attention to green innovation will directly affect the strategic decision-making and action direction of enterprises. Based on the data of A-share listed companies in China from 2011 to 2022, this paper constructs a negative binomial regression model with the theories of high-level echelon theory and attention-based view, and empirically tests the influence of executives’ environmental perception of on the performance of different forms of green innovation. In the process, it focuses on the influence of R&D investment as a threshold variable on the performance of substantive green innovation. In the adjustment effect test, the effects of environmental uncertainty and enterprise transparency on the performance of different forms of green innovation are investigated. Finally, this paper analyzes the heterogeneity according to the nature of enterprise property rights and whether it belongs to heavily polluting industries, and tests the influence of executives' environmental awareness on green innovation performance under different conditions.

The main conclusions are as follows: (1) Environmental awareness of executives can effectively promote the green innovation performance of enterprises, but it mainly affects the strategic green innovation performance. After a series of robustness tests, this conclusion still holds; The direct mechanism of executives' environmental awareness on substantive green innovation performance needs to be improved with the increase of R&D investment intensity. (2) Environmental uncertainty has no significant moderating effect on the impact of executives' environmental awareness on substantive green innovation performance, but it can promote its positive impact on strategic green innovation performance. (3) Corporate transparency has a significant negative regulatory effect on executives' environmental awareness and strategic green innovation performance, but has no significant regulatory effect on substantive green innovation. (4) The empirical results of heterogeneity analysis show that in non-state-owned enterprises and enterprises with heavy pollution industries, executives' awareness of environmental protection can only promote strategic green innovation of enterprises, but has limited promotion effect on substantive green innovation performance.

This paper expands the research boundary between the high-level echelon theory and the attention-based view, and studies how the cognitive level of the top management team drives the green innovation activities of enterprises. In addition, the influence of environmental uncertainty and enterprise transparency on the form of green innovation is discussed, and the regulatory role between them is further analyzed. This study provides beneficial enlightenment and suggestions for enterprises to effectively achieve green innovation performance, which has certain theoretical and practical significance.

参考文献:

参考文献

[1] 黎文靖,郑曼妮. 实质性创新还是策略性创新?——宏观产业政策对微观企业创新的影响[J]. 经济研究, 2016, 51(04): 60-73.

[2] 孙自愿,周翼强,章砚. 竞争还是普惠?——政府激励政策选择与企业创新迎合倾向政策约束[J]. 会计研究, 2021, (07): 99-112.

[3] 王旭,杨有德. 企业绿色技术创新的动态演进:资源捕获还是价值创造[J]. 财经科学, 2018, (12): 53-66.

[4] D C Hambrick, Mason P A. Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers[J]. The Academy of Management Review, 1984, 9(2): 193-206.

[5] 吴建祖,华欣意. 高管团队注意力与企业绿色创新战略——来自中国制造业上市公司的经验证据[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2021, 42(09): 122-142.

[6] J G March, Simon H A. Organizations.[M]. Oxford, England: Wiley, 1958.

[7] 张蕊,叶艳艳,刘启亮. 高管团队环境注意力会影响审计定价吗[J]. 会计之友, 2023, (24): 43-53.

[8] 刘丽娟,任玉强,韩丽萍. 高管环保认知与企业ESG表现——基于企业绿色发展的视角[J]. 会计之友, 2024, (01): 100-108.

[9] 李亚兵,夏月,赵振. 高管绿色认知对重污染行业企业绩效的影响:一个有调节的中介效应模型[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2023, 40(7): 113-123.

[10] E Braun, Wield D. Regulation as a means for the social control of technology[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 1994, 3(6): 259-272.

[11] K Rennings. Redefining innovation — eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics[J]. Ecological Economics, 2000, 32(2): 319-332.

[12] Y Chen, Lai S, Wen C. The Influence of Green Innovation Performance on Corporate Advantage in Taiwan [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2006, 67(4): 331-339.

[13] 彭雪蓉,黄学. 企业生态创新影响因素研究前沿探析与未来研究热点展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2013, 35(9): 61-71, 80.

[14] C De Laurentis, Cooke P. Green innovation and policy: a co-evolutionary approach[A]//2008: 1-25.

[15] 曹翠珍,冯娇龙. 冗余资源对绿色创新模式选择的影响:环境规制的整合视角[J]. 管理评论, 2022, 34(05): 124-135.

[16] 席龙胜,赵辉. 高管双元环保认知、绿色创新与企业可持续发展绩效[J]. 经济管理, 2022, 44(03): 139-158.

[17] X Zhao, Zhao Y, Zeng S, et al. Corporate behavior and competitiveness: impact of environmental regulation on Chinese firms[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 86311-322.

[18] 王永贵,李霞. 促进还是抑制:政府研发补助对企业绿色创新绩效的影响[J]. 中国工业经济, 2023, (02): 131-149.

[19] 张泽南,钱欣钰,曹新伟. 企业数字化转型的绿色创新效应研究:实质性创新还是策略性创新?[J]. 产业经济研究, 2023, (01): 86-100.

[20] 南建设. 企业内部环境的概念及构成要素研究述评及展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2015, 37(4): 76-83.

[21] R B Duncan. Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1972, 17(3): 313-327.

[22] R L Tung. Dimensions of Organizational Environments: An Exploratory Study of Their Impact on Organization Structure [J]. The Academy of Management Journal, 1979, 22(4): 672-693.

[23] F J Milliken. Three Types of Perceived Uncertainty About the Environment: State, Effect, and Response Uncertainty[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1987, 12(1): 133-143.

[24] 葛家澍. 关于高质量会计准则的几个问题[J]. 会计研究, 2002, (10): 16-23.

[25] W Ocasio. Towards an Attention-based View of the Firm[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1997, 18187-206.

[26] 冯健,戴维奇,周丹. 高管团队职能背景与公司创业投资:注意力焦点的中介作用[J]. 管理评论, 2022, 34(12): 121-130.

[27] 操友根,任声策,杜梅. 专利诉讼、高管团队创新注意力与企业创新——基于诉讼事件属性的二次调节作用[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(02): 189-199.

[28] M C Jensen, Meckling W H. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976, 3(4): 305-360.

[29] 赵领娣,王小飞. 企业绿色投资及绿色费用能否提升经营绩效?——基于EBM和面板Tobit模型的经验分析[J]. 北京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 24(3).

[30] 邹志勇,辛沛祝,晁玉方,等. 高管绿色认知、企业绿色行为对企业绿色绩效的影响研究——基于山东轻工业企业数据的实证分析[J]. 华东经济管理, 2019, 33(12): 35-41.

[31] W M Cohen, Levinthal D A. Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation[J]. Administrative science quarterly, 1990, 128-152.

[32] D L Gadenne, Kennedy J, McKeiver C. An Empirical Study of Environmental Awareness and Practices in SMEs[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2009, 84(1): 45-63.

[33] S Kaplan. Research in Cognition and Strategy: Reflections on Two Decades of Progress and a Look to the Future[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2011, 48(3): 665-695.

[34] Y Sun, Sun H. Executives’ Environmental Awareness and Eco-Innovation: An Attention-Based View[J]. Sustainability, 2021, 13(8): 4421.

[35] S Ren, Wang Y, Hu Y, et al. CEO hometown identity and firm green innovation[J]. Business strategy and the environment, 2021, 30(2): 756-774.

[36] B Xu, Gao X, Cai W, et al. How Environmental Leadership Boosts Employees’ Green Innovation Behavior? A Moderated Mediation Model[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2022, 12.

[37] 冯忠垒,谢雄标,严良. 社会网络情境下企业绿色行为的形成机制模型——基于社会认知论的社会网络、管理者认知与绿色行为三方互动分析[J]. 生态经济, 2015, 31(10): 174-179.

[38] 徐建中,贯君,林艳. 制度压力、高管环保意识与企业绿色创新实践——基于新制度主义理论和高阶理论视角[J]. 管理评论, 2017, 29(09): 72-83.

[39] 曹洪军,陈泽文. 内外环境对企业绿色创新战略的驱动效应——高管环保意识的调节作用[J]. 南开管理评论, 2017, 20(06): 95-103.

[40] 邢丽云,俞会新. 绿色动态能力对企业环境创新的影响研究——环境规制和高管环保认知的调节作用[J]. 软科学, 2020, 34(06): 26-32.

[41] 梁敏,曹洪军,王小洁. 高管环保认知、动态能力与企业绿色创新绩效——环境不确定性的调节效应[J]. 科技管理研究, 2022, 42(04): 209-216.

[42] 范黎波,于心悦,吴易明. 高管团队注意力对企业绿色创新的影响研究——基于注意力基础观视角[J]. 江西社会科学, 2023, 43(04): 78-89.

[43] S F M. Firm Size, Market Structure, Opportunity, and the Output of Patented Inventions [J]. The American Economic Review, 1965, 55(5): 1097-1125.

[44] D C Mueller. Patents, Research and Development, and the Measurement of Inventive Activity.[J]. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 1966, 26-37.

[45] B H Hall, Lotti F, Mairesse J. Evidence on the impact of R&D and ICT investments on innovation and productivity in Italian firms[J]. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2013, 22(3): 300-328.

[46] J Lee, Kwon H, Pati N. Exploring the relative impact of R&D and operational efficiency on performance: A sequential regression-neural network approach[J]. Expert Systems With Applications, 2019, 137420-431.

[47] 陶爱萍,马金龙,蒯鹏. R&D资金投入结构对技术创新效率的影响研究——基于中国工业行业的实证分析[J]. 华东经济管理, 2019, 33(05): 83-90.

[48] 李静怡,王祯阳,武咸云. 政策激励与研发投入交互作用对创新绩效的影响[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(5): 99-110.

[49] 梅冰菁,罗剑朝. 财政补贴、研发投入与企业创新绩效——制度差异下有调节的中介效应模型检验[J]. 经济经纬, 2020, 37(01): 167-176.

[50] 卫平,汤雅茜. 高新技术企业创新能力提升及其驱动因素——来自7城市企业微观调查数据的证据[J]. 改革, 2020, (06): 136-147.

[51] D Ravšelj, Aristovnik A. The Impact of R&D Expenditures on Corporate Performance: Evidence from Slovenian and World R&D Companies[J]. Sustainability, 2020, 12(5): 1943.

[52] 杨武,杨大飞,雷家骕. R&D 投入对技术创新绩效的影响研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2019, 37(9): 1712-1720.

[53] 杜雯秦,郭淑娟. 企业异质性、研发投入与创新绩效——基于GPS的实证研究[J]. 科技管理研究, 2021, 41(23): 124-132.

[54] 何颖青. 股权激励、研发投入与企业创新绩效——基于创业板上市公司的经验证据[J]. 技术与创新管理, 2022, 43(01): 40-47.

[55] V Panousi, Papanikolaou D. Investment, Idiosyncratic Risk, and Ownership [J]. The Journal of Finance, 2012, 67(3): 1113-1148.

[56] H Gulen, Ion M. Policy Uncertainty and Corporate Investment[J]. Review of Financial Studies, 2015, 29(3): 523-564.

[57] B N Ashraf, Shen Y. Economic policy uncertainty and banks' loan pricing[J]. Journal of Financial Stability, 2019, 44(C): 100695.

[58] Z Xu. Economic policy uncertainty, cost of capital, and corporate innovation[J]. Journal of banking & finance, 2020, 111(C): 105698.

[59] Y Zhu, Sun Z, Zhang S, et al. Economic Policy Uncertainty, Environmental Regulation, and Green Innovation—An Empirical Study Based on Chinese High-Tech Enterprises[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021, 18(18): 9503.

[60] 郭田勇,孙光宇. 经济政策不确定性、融资成本和企业创新[J]. 国际金融研究, 2021, (10): 78-87.

[61] 马勇,石甘霖,刘云涛. 环境不确定性对企业创新的影响研究[J]. 财经理论与实践, 2022, 43(1): 2-8.

[62] 李晓涛,段杰虎. 环境不确定性、高管激励与企业技术创新——来自重污染企业的经验数据[J]. 会计之友, 2022, (04): 88-95.

[63] X Yang, Mao S, Sun L, et al. The Effect of Economic Policy Uncertainty on Green Technology Innovation: Evidence from China’s Enterprises[J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14(18): 11522.

[64] X Peng, Zou X, Zhao X, et al. How does economic policy uncertainty affect green innovation?[J]. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 2023, 29(1): 114-140.

[65] 王慧,孙慧,肖涵月,等. “谨小慎微”抑或“险中求胜”?——环境政策不确定性与污染密集型企业绿色创新[J]. 产业经济研究, 2021, (02): 30-41.

[66] 魏建,李世杰. 不确定性感知与企业绿色技术创新——基于区域与企业异质性视角的分析[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 30(01): 33-52.

[67] 成琼文,陆思宇. 经济政策不确定性、环境管制与绿色创新[J]. 华东经济管理, 2022, 36(11): 44-53.

[68] 何超,李延喜,徐润香. 企业不确定性感知对创新决策的影响研究[J]. 管理学报, 2023, 20(4): 543-557.

[69] R I Zhong. Transparency and firm innovation[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2018, 66(1): 67-93.

[70] J R Brown, Martinsson G. Does Transparency Stifle or Facilitate Innovation?[J]. Management Science, 2018, 65(4): 1600-1623.

[71] 李建军,钱昱舟. 企业透明度与企业创新——基于我国沪深主板上市公司的实证研究[J]. 现代管理科学, 2019, (10): 70-72.

[72] 高燕,万萌菲,龙子午. 企业透明度与科技创新——基于高新技术企业的实证检验[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2019, 36(07): 105-114.

[73] 刘柏,徐小欢. 信息透明度影响企业研发创新吗?[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2020, 42(2): 30-42.

[74] 徐良果. 盈余信息透明度、代理问题与企业技术创新[J]. 中国注册会计师, 2021, (03): 64-68.

[75] 王可第. 信息透明度与企业技术创新——来自中国上市公司的证据[J]. 当代财经, 2021, (07): 77-89.

[76] 冯怡. 会计信息透明度、双重创新与企业价值创造能力[J]. 财会通讯, 2020, (13): 49-53.

[77] 雷新途,温卿云. 信息透明度对创新投入与创新成果的促进机理——来自上市公司的经验证据[J]. 华东经济管理, 2021, 35(06): 53-67.

[78] 王馨,王营. 环境信息公开的绿色创新效应研究——基于《环境空气质量标准》的准自然实验[J]. 金融研究, 2021, (10): 134-152.

[79] 谢雪燕,徐晓慧. 信息透明度与中小企业技术创新——基于融资结构与代理问题的双重视角[J]. 武汉金融, 2023, (03): 42-52.

[80] 陈洪玮,徐清如,陈霏. 制度环境与研发投入对高技术产业创新绩效的影响[J]. 统计与决策, 2021, 37(18): 166-170.

[81] 俞立平,张宏如. 区域创新升级:如何从创新数量走向创新质量——基于统计学视角的模式识别及跃迁机制研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2023, (02): 35-45.

[82] 崔维军,孙成,陈光. 距离产生美? 政企关系对企业融通创新的影响[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2021, 42(06): 81-101.

[83] L Fleming, Sorenson O. Science as a map in technological search[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2004, 25(89): 909-928.

[84] 李青原,肖泽华. 异质性环境规制工具与企业绿色创新激励——来自上市企业绿色专利的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2020, 55(09): 192-208.

[85] 邹国平,刘洪德,王广益. 我国国有企业规模与研发强度相关性研究[J]. 管理评论, 2015, 27(12): 171-179.

[86] 叶志强,赵炎. 独立董事、制度环境与研发投入[J]. 管理学报, 2017, 14(07): 1033-1040.

[87] 申慧慧,于鹏,吴联生. 国有股权、环境不确定性与投资效率[J]. 经济研究, 2012, 47(07): 113-126.

[88] 辛清泉,孔东民,郝颖. 公司透明度与股价波动性[J]. 金融研究, 2014, (10): 193-206.

[89] 张玉明,刘晗,李双. 信息透明度、环保关注与重污染企业绿色创新[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2023, 1-12.

[90] J Hausman, Taylor W. Panel data and unobservable individual effects[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 1981, 16(1): 155.

[91] 阮敏,肖风. 自愿参与型环境规制与企业技术创新——公众关注度和市场进程的调节作用[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2022, 39(02): 79-90.

[92] B E Hansen. Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and inference[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 1999, 93(2): 345-368.

[93] 李虹,邹庆. 环境规制、资源禀赋与城市产业转型研究——基于资源型城市与非资源型城市的对比分析[J]. 经济研究, 2018, 53(11): 182-198.

[94] 王宏鹏,张阳,田鸣. 政府研发补贴、慈善捐赠对绿色创新的影响及其门槛效应研究[J]. 软科学, 2022, 36(07): 1-7.

中图分类号:

 F273.1    

开放日期:

 2024-06-14    

无标题文档

   建议浏览器: 谷歌 火狐 360请用极速模式,双核浏览器请用极速模式