经济高质量发展背景下，我国生态环境保护和碳排放控制的成效逐渐显现，碳排放、经济增长和生态环境的协同关系也在发生变化。如何在实现碳排放目标的同时，实现经济高质量发展和生态环境优化，是我国面临的重要问题。为厘清碳排放、经济发展和生态环境的关系，推动我国碳排放-经济发展-生态环境三维系统协调发展，需要深入研究碳排放-经济发展-生态环境三维系统的协调发展关系。本文在对碳排放-经济发展-生态环境三维系统的理论成果进行梳理的前提下，融入耦合协调性理论和方法，以高质量发展理论等为基础，构建我国30个省份碳排放、经济发展、生态环境三个子系统指标体系。釆用熵值法分别计算三个子系统的综合指数。运用耦合协调模型测度二维系统、三维系统耦合协调度。并且，构建空间相关性模型和障碍度模型，对我国30个省份碳排放-经济发展-生态环境三维系统耦合协调的空间相关性、空间聚集性、障碍度进行分析。 

       结果表明，我国30个省份三维系统耦合协调度呈现上升趋势，耦合协调等级呈现出东高西低差异化特征。各省份碳排放-经济发展-生态环境的三维系统耦合协调存在显著的空间相关关系。新疆由“低-低”聚集变为“高-低”聚集，河北、山西、山东、河南形成稳定的“高-高”聚集格局，其他省份不存在聚集效应。制约三维系统协调发展的系统层障碍因素中，碳排放子系统障碍度呈上升趋势。准则层中，环境污染、环境治理、环境质量为主要的障碍因素。社会消费品零售总额增长率为主要的指标层障碍因素。最后，结合研究结果，提出调整能源结构、促进区域低碳减排合作等对策建议。

        Under the background of high-quality economic development, the effectiveness of China's ecological environment protection and carbon emission control is gradually emerging, and the synergistic relationship between carbon emission, economic growth and ecological environment is also changing. How to achieve high-quality economic development and ecological environment optimization while achieving the carbon emission target is an important problem facing China. In order to clarify the relationship between carbon emission, economic development and ecological environment and promote the coordinated development of China's three-dimensional system of carbon emission, economic development and ecological environment, it is necessary to deeply study the coordinated development relationship of the three-dimensional system of carbon emission, economic development and ecological environment. On the premise of combing the theoretical results of the three-dimensional system of carbon emission, economic development and ecological environment, this paper integrates the coupling coordination theory and method, and constructs the three subsystem index system of carbon emission, economic development and ecological environment in 30 provinces of China based on the high-quality development theory. The entropy method is used to calculate the comprehensive indexes of the three subsystems. The coupling coordination degree model is used to measure the coupling coordination scheduling of two-dimensional system and three-dimensional system. Moreover, the spatial correlation model and obstacle degree model are constructed to analyze the spatial correlation, spatial aggregation and obstacle factors of the three-dimensional system coupling coordination degree of carbon emission, economic development and ecological environment in 30 provinces of China.

        The results show that the coupling coordination degree of three-dimensional system in 30 provinces in China shows an upward trend, and the coupling coordination level shows the characteristics of high in the East and low differentiation in the West. There is a significant spatial correlation between the three-dimensional system coupling and coordination of carbon emission, economic development and ecological environment in each province. Xinjiang has changed from "low-low" aggregation to "high-low" aggregation. Hebei, Shanxi, Shandong and Henan have formed a stable "high-high" aggregation pattern, and there is no aggregation effect in other provinces. Among the system level obstacles restricting the coordinated development of three-dimensional system, the obstacle degree of carbon emission subsystem shows an upward trend. In the criterion layer, environmental pollution, environmental governance and environmental quality are the main obstacle factors. The growth rate of total retail sales of social consumer goods is the main indicator barrier factor. Finally, combined with the research results, this paper puts forward countermeasures and suggestions to adjust the energy structure and promote regional low-carbon emission reduction cooperation.

[1]陈敏鹏.《联合国气候变化框架公约》适应谈判历程回顾与展望[J].气候变化研究进展,2020,16(01):105-116.

[2]刘洪岩.2020后全球气候谈判：新问题、新挑战、新方案[J].人民论坛,2020,28(03):110-114.

[3]翁智雄.中国实现碳中和远景目标的市场化减排机制研究[J].环境保护,2021,49(Z 1):66-69.

[4]Feng J C,Tang S,Yu Z.Integrated development of economic growth,energy consumption, and environment protection from different regions:based on city level[J].Energy Procedia,2019,158:68-87.

[5]Andrée B P J,Chamorro A,Spencer P,et al.Revisiting the Relation between economic growth and the environment;a Global Assessment of Deforestation,Pollution and Carbon Emission[J].Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,2019,114:109-115.

[6]Yao S J,Zhang S,Zhang X M.Renewable energy,carbon emission and economic growth:A revised environmental Kuznets Curve perspective[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2019,235:38-52.

[7]Fan Y P,Fang C L,Zhang Q.Coupling coordinated development between social economy and ecological environment in Chinese provincial capital cities-assessment and policy implications[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2019,229:289-298.

[8]Song Z G.Economic growth and carbon emissions: Estimation of a panel threshold model for the transition process in China[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2020,278:23-43.

[9]Shi T,Yang S Y,Zhang W,et al.Coupling coordination degree measurement and spatiotemporal heterogeneity between economic development and ecological environment-Empirical evidence from tropical and subtropical regions of China[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2020,244:11-29.

[10]Chen J D,Li Z W,Dong Y Z,et al.Coupling coordination between carbon emissions and the eco-environment in China[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2020,276:38-56.

[11]Li W W,Yi P T,Zhang D N,et al.Assessment of coordinated development between social economy and ecological environment:Case study of resource-based cities in Northeastern China[J].Sustainable Cities and Society,2020,59:56-73.

[12]Li L,Fan Z, Wu F, et al.Coupling coordination degree spatial analysis and driving factor between socio-economic and eco-environment in northern China[J].Ecological Indicators,2022,135:10-29.

[13]Du Q,Zhou J,Pan T,et al.Relationship of carbon emissions and economic growth in China's construction industry[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2019,220:99-109.

[14]Li L,Hong X F,Peng K.A spatial panel analysis of carbon emissions, economic growth and high-technology industry in China[J].Structural Change and Economic Dynamics,2019,49:83-92.

[15]Zheng J L,Mi Z F,Coffman D’M,et al.The Slowdown in China’s Carbon Emissions Growth in the New Phase of Economic Development[J].One Earth,2019,1:240-253.

[16]Salman M,Long X L,Dauda L,et al.The impact of institutional quality on economic growth and carbon emissions:Evidence from Indonesia,South Korea and Thailand [J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2019,241:11-31.

[17]Mardani A,Streimikiene D,Cavallaro F,et al.Carbon dioxide(CO2) emissions and economic growth:A systematic review of two decades of research from 1995 to 2017[J].Ence of the Total Environment,2019,649:31-49.

[18]Shahbaz M,Nasir M A,Hille E,et al.UK's net-zero carbon emissions target: Investigating the potential role of economic growth,financial development, and R&D expenditures based on historical data (1870-2017)[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2020,161:20-45.

[19]Sheng P F,Li J,Zhai M X,et al.Coupling of economic growth and reduction in carbon emissions at the efficiency level: Evidence from China[J].Energy,2020,213:11-27.

[20]Yan B,Wang F,Dong M R,et al.How do financial spatial structure and economic agglomeration affect carbon emission intensity? Theory extension and evidence from China[J].Economic Modelling,2022,108:57-75.

[21]Wang Q,Su M.Drivers of decoupling economic growth from carbon emission –an empirical analysis of 192 countries using decoupling model and decomposition method [J].Environmental Impact Assessment Review,2020,81:10-31.

[22]Das N,Roy J.India can increase its mitigation ambition:An analysis based on historical evidence of decoupling between emission and economic growth[J].Energy for Sustainable Development,2020,57:189-199.

[23]Simbi C H,Lin J Y,Yang D W,et al.Decomposition and decoupling analysis of carbon dioxide emissions in African countries during 1984-2014[J].Journal of Environmental Sciences,2021,102:85-98.

[24]Vujović T,Petković Z,Pavlović M,et al.Economic growth based in carbon dioxide emission intensity[J].Physica A:Statistical Mechanics and its Applications,2018,506:179-185.

[25]Li J Y,Li S S.Energy investment, economic growth and carbon emissions in China-Empirical analysis based on spatial Durbin model[J].Energy Policy,2020,140:42-65.

[26]Nguyen T T,Pham T A T,Tram H T X.Role of information and communication technologies and innovation in driving carbon emissions and economic growth in selected G-20 countries[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2020,261:62-84.

[27]Akadiri S S,Alola A A,Olasehinde-Williams G,et al.The role of electricity consumption, globalization and economic growth in carbon dioxide emissions and its implications for environmental sustainability targets[J].Science of the Total Environment,2020,708:46-69.

[28]Liu J P,Tian Y,Huang K,et al.Spatial-temporal differentiation of the coupling coordinated development of regional energy-economy-ecology system: A case study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt[J].Ecological Indicators,2021,124:94-112.

[29]范慧平,孟天醒,文倩,等.河南省生态环境与经济发展关系的动态计量分析[J].河南农业大学学报, 2015,49(04):511-516.

[30]谷国锋,王雪辉.东北地区经济发展与生态环境耦合关系时空分析[J].东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,68(04):154-160.

[31]周茜.中国经济增长对环境质量的互动效应研究[J].统计与决策,2019,35(01):150-154.

[32]李强,韦薇.长江经济带经济发展质量与生态环境优化耦合协调度研究[J].软科学,2019,33(05):117-122.

[33]刘玉凤,高良谋.京津冀城市群经济与环境的耦合协调发展及时空演化分析[J].统计与决策,2019,35(10):134-137.

[34]苏胜亮.宁夏回族自治区生态环境与经济发展耦合协调研究[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(02):367-374.

[35]李静,马亚亚,王杰,等.固原市原州区生态环境与经济系统的耦合协调发展[J].水土保持通报,2020,40(01):229-235.

[36]高林安.经济发展与生态环境耦合协调性识别与优化路径研究——以东北地区为例[J].统计与信息论坛,2020,35(01):74-81.

[37]丁晓健,杜鹏.辽宁省经济与生态环境耦合协调性分析[J].生产力研究,2020,35 (05):85-88.

[38]朱玉鑫,姚顺波.基于生态系统服务价值变化的环境与经济协调发展研究——以陕西省为例[J].生态学报,2021,41(09):3331-3342.

[39]武娜,沈镭,钟帅,等.晋陕蒙地区经济发展与碳排放时空耦合关系[J].经济地理,2019,39(09):17-23.

[40]原嫄,孙欣彤.城市化、产业结构、能源消费、经济发展与碳排放的关联性分析——基于中国省际收入水平异质性的实证研究[J].气候变化研究进展,2020,16(06):738-7 47.

[41]田云,林子娟.长江经济带农业碳排放与经济增长的时空耦合关系[J].中国农业大学学报,2021,26(01):208-218.

[42]宁亚东,章博雅,丁涛.长江经济带碳排放脱钩状态及其驱动因素研究[J].大连理工大学学报,2017,57(05):459-466.

[43]王越,赵婧宇,李志学,等.东北三省碳排放脱钩效应及驱动因素研究[J].环境科学与技术,2019,42(06):190-196.

[44]宋旭,贾俊松,陈春谛,等.江西省能耗碳排放时空特征、脱钩关系及其驱动因素[J].生态学报,2020,40(20):7451-7463.

[45]王杰,李治国,谷继建.金砖国家碳排放与经济增长脱钩弹性及驱动因素——基于Tapio脱钩和LMDI模型的分析[J].世界地理研究,2021,30(03):501-508.

[46]吴鸣然,赵敏.能源消费、环境污染与经济发展的动态关系——基于中国1990-2014年时间序列数据[J].技术经济与管理研究,2016,37(12):25-29.

[47]傅强,张小漫,张亚军.环境污染与经济发展、能源消费、FDI和城镇化的双向耦合关系[J].华东经济管理,2017,31(01):83-91.

[48]李力,洪雪飞,王俊,等.基于PLS与ESDA的经济-能源-环境系统耦合协调发展研究[J].软科学,2018,32(11):44-48.

[49]朱鹏飞,包青.能源使用、环境保护与经济发展的关系——基于排污权的区域协调研究[J].华东经济管理,2018,32(07):120-125.

[50]关伟,金一.中国能源利用、经济发展演进对生态环境的脉冲响应[J].经济地理,2020,40(02):31-40.

[51]曹成龙,殷艺桐,林刚,等.区域能源-经济-环境系统耦合协调演化特征——以宁波市为例[J].科技导报,2020,38(11):70-77.

[52]陈丹临.开放经济环境下长三角地区能源-环境-经济系统协调度评价[J].现代经济探讨,2020,39(12):74-79.

[53]张磊.财政政策支持下的新兴产业对能源-经济-环境发展的影响[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版),2020,22(03):152-160.

[54]杨志清.河南省能源、经济与环境(3E)系统绿色发展评价与分析[J].河南农业大学学报,2021,55(01):180-190.

[55]李淑文.基于IPAT的区域能源消费碳排放时空代谢路径及影响因素研究[D]:南开大学,2016.

[56]廖重斌.环境与经济协调发展的定量评判及其分类体系——以珠江三角洲城市群为例[J].热带地理,1999,17(02):76-82.

[57]吴跃明,郎东锋,张子珩,等.环境-经济系统协调度模型及其指标体系[J].中国人口•资源与环境,1996,07(02):51-54.

[58]Brundtland G H,Khalid M.Our common future[J].Earth&Us,1991,11(01):29-31.

[59]牛文元.可持续发展理论的基本认知[J].地理科学进展,2008,27(03):1-6.

[60]张军扩,侯永志,刘培林,等.高质量发展的目标要求和战略路径[J].管理世界,2019,35(07):1-7.

[61]禹湘,陈楠,李曼琪.中国低碳试点城市的碳排放特征与碳减排路径研究[J].中国人口•资源与环境,2020,30(07):1-9.

[62]王岱.中国碳排放-经济发展-环境保护耦合协调关系分析[D].西北师范大学,2020.

[63]刘志华,徐军委,张彩虹.省域碳减排-经济增长-环境保护协调发展的时空分异及驱动机制[J].海南大学学报(人文社会科学版),2021,39(05):63-72.

[64]张建威,黄茂兴.黄河流域经济高质量发展与生态环境耦合协调发展研究[J].统计与决策,2021,37(16):142-145.

[65]王瑛,缪勤.省域经济与环境动态综合评价及耦合协调测度[J].湖南大学学报(社会科学版),2021,35(04):63-68.

[66]杨丽,孙之淳.基于熵值法的西部新型城镇化发展水平测评[J].经济问题,2015, 37(03):115-119.

[67]杨阳,唐晓岚,贾艳艳,等.长江流域人口-土地-经济城镇化的时空耦合协调性与驱动因子分析[J].世界地理研究,2021,30(05):978-990.

[68]田泽,景晓栋,肖钦文.长江经济带碳排放-产业结构-区域创新耦合度及时空演化[J].华东经济管理,2020,34(02):10-17.

[69]Anselin L.Local Indicators of Spatial Association LISA[J].Geographical Ana-lysis,1995, 27(02):93-115.

[70]吴英玲,尹鹏,周丽君,等.中国省域旅游产业与人居环境耦合关系及其障碍因子研究[J].生态经济,2019,35(02):155-159.

[71]吕靖烨,张林辉.技术创新视角下环境规制与经营绩效研究[J].经济与管理,2021,35(02):40-46.

[72]吕靖烨,胡美艳,文启湘.新贸易壁垒下外资企业退出我国市场的问题研究[J].南都学坛,2019,39(05):110-115.

[73]吕靖烨,姚佳棋,李朋林.西安市科技资源配置效率浅析[J].技术与创新管理,2019,40(04):465-469.