- 无标题文档
查看论文信息

论文中文题名:

 冀中能源安全会计信息披露质量 对企业价值的影响研究    

姓名:

 廖娟华    

学号:

 19302220106    

保密级别:

 公开    

论文语种:

 chi    

学科代码:

 125300    

学科名称:

 管理学 - 会计    

学生类型:

 硕士    

学位级别:

 管理学硕士    

学位年度:

 2022    

培养单位:

 西安科技大学    

院系:

 管理学院    

专业:

 会计    

研究方向:

 财务管理理论与实务    

第一导师姓名:

 史恭龙    

第一导师单位:

 西安科技大学    

论文提交日期:

 2022-06-16    

论文答辩日期:

 2022-06-06    

论文外文题名:

 Research on the influence of Jizhong Energy security accounting information disclosure quality on enterprise value    

论文中文关键词:

 煤炭行业 ; 安全会计信息 ; 信息披露质量 ; 企业价值 ; 冀中能源    

论文外文关键词:

 Coal industry ; Safety accounting information ; Quality of information disclosure ; Enterprise value ; Jizhong Energy    

论文中文摘要:

党的十九大报告明确指出,企业发展要注重安全生产,树立安全发展理念,完善安全生产责任制。这意味着企业在发展过程中不能片面追求利益最大化,理应肩负起更多安全责任,而安全会计信息作为政府和社会公众了解企业安全生产状况的窗口,其披露质量已成为当前的研究重点。企业积极主动披露安全会计信息,提高安全会计信息披露质量就是勇于承担安全责任的表现,可以树立企业良好形象,吸引更多投资者,也能提升企业社会声誉,最终影响企业价值。因此,在煤炭行业安全生产问题备受瞩目的环境下,探究煤炭企业安全会计信息披露质量对企业价值产生的影响显得尤为重要。

本文以冀中能源为例,首先对所涉及的相关概念及理论展开介绍并阐述在文章中的合理运用。其次,采用内容分析法构建煤炭行业安全会计信息披露质量评价体系,并应用在案例企业中,以此得出冀中能源2015-2020年各期间的披露质量分值。再次,通过自由现金流量贴现模型进行估值并分析冀中能源安全会计信息披露质量对企业价值的具体影响。研究发现:(1)煤炭行业安全会计信息披露模式主要有6种,董事会报告和财务报告及附注的披露模式使用较多,而招股说明书和重大事项内部报告的使用频率较小;披露内容方面,强制性披露质量较高,而自愿性披露的主动性较差。(2)冀中能源在2015-2020年间的披露模式情况与煤炭行业现状如出一辙;披露内容方面,定性披露占比高于定量披露,强制性信息披露质量优于自愿性信息披露;存在披露主动性差、披露质量不高、披露的负面信息缺失等问题,内部原因是缺乏高素质的安全会计人才、安全责任意识匮乏,外部原因则是公众安全监管意识不够、缺少外部审计。(3)冀中能源安全会计信息披露质量与企业价值整体正相关,企业安全会计信息披露的质量越高会使营业成本、财务费用、所得税费用、经营流动负债降低,而营业收入、固定资产、无形资产、商誉、长期待摊费用则会增加,最终影响企业价值的变化。基于以上研究,本文从社会、政府和企业三个角度提出对策建议,促进冀中能源提高其安全会计信息披露质量从而增加企业价值,也为煤炭行业其他企业提供相关参考和借鉴。

论文外文摘要:

The report to the 19th National Congress of the CPC clearly pointed out that enterprises should pay attention to production safety, establish the concept of safe development, and improve the responsibility system for production safety.This means that enterprises in the process of development, they should not unilaterally pursue profit maximization, should shoulder more safety responsibilities, and safety accounting information as the government and the public to understand the enterprise safety production status window, its disclosure quality has become the focus of current research.Enterprises actively disclose safety accounting information, improve the quality of safety accounting information disclosure is the performance of the courage to assume safety responsibility, can establish a good corporate image, attract more investors, but also improve the social reputation of the enterprise, and ultimately affect the value of the enterprise.Therefore, in the coal industry safety production issues under the environment of concern, it is particularly important to explore the impact of the quality of safety accounting information disclosure on the value of coal enterprises.

Taking Jizhong Energy as an example, this paper first introduced the relevant concepts and theories involved and expounded the reasonable application in the article.Secondly, the content analysis method was used to construct the quality evaluation system of safety accounting information disclosure in the coal industry, and applied it in the case enterprises, so as to obtain the disclosure quality score of Jizhong Energy during each period from 2015-2020.Thirdly, the free cash flow discount model was valued and the specific impact of the quality of safety accounting information disclosure on the enterprise value was analyzed.The research found that: (1)There were 6 main kinds of safety accounting information disclosure mode in coal industry, and the disclosure mode of board report, financial report and notes was widely used, while the prospectus and internal report of major matters were used less; In terms of disclosure content, while the quality of mandatory disclosure was high, the initiative of voluntary disclosure was poor. (2)The disclosure mode of Jizhong Energy from 2015-2020 was exactly the current situation of the coal industry; In terms of disclosure content, qualitative disclosure was higher than quantitative disclosure, mandatory information disclosure was better than voluntary information disclosure; Poor disclosure initiative, low disclosure quality and missing negative information, internal reasons were lack of high-quality safety accounting talents and safety responsibility awareness; External reasons were insufficient public safety supervision awareness and external audit. (3)Jizhong Energy security accounting information disclosure quality was correlated to the value of the enterprise as a whole, the higher the quality of enterprise security accounting information disclosure would make the operating costs, financial expenses, income tax, operating current liabilities, and operating income, fixed assets, intangible assets, goodwill, long-term deferred expenses would increase, eventually affected the change of enterprise value.Based on the above research, this paper puts forward countermeasures and suggestions from the perspectives of society, government and enterprises to promote Jizhong Energy to improve its safety accounting information disclosure quality and increase the value of the enterprise, and also provide relevant reference for other enterprises in the coal industry.

参考文献:

[1]Asdiou A, Mokhtari B. The indicators of the corporate social responsibility: A search for efficiency or a concern for legitimacy towards stakeholders: A proposed explanatory model[J]. International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering and Technology, 2019, 10(1): 62-76.

[2]Isabelle. Environmental accounting information disclosure: A summary[C]. Computer Science and Electronic Technology International Society, 2019: 703-707.

[3]Roshima. Disclosure of carbon accounting information in a low carbon economy[C]. Science and Engineering Research Center, 2019: 168-172.

[4]Wang Peixin. Does mandatory corporate social responsibility disclosure affect share price responses to earnings Aannouncements?Evidence from China[J]. Journal of International Accounting Research, 2021, 20(3): 137-164.

[5]Azevedo Freire, Maria Macileya,Antonio Rodrigues. The Influence of corporate social responsibility on the quality of accounting statements of Brazilian companies[J]. Revista Catarinense Da Ciência Contábil, 2022, 21(1): 1-16.

[6]Corinne Cortese. Corporate social responsibility reporting quality, board characteristics and corporate social reputation[J]. Pacific Accounting Review, 2015, 19(27):95-118.

[7]Christine. The use of Corporate social responsibility accounting information disclosure [J]. Journal of accounting and Policy, 2018, 13(22): 325-345.

[8]Kilian. Analysis of social responsibility accounting information disclosure of coal enterprises in China[C]. China Journal of Accounting Research, 2019: 500-503.

[9]Huang Fangliang, Xiang Lijin. The IPO corporate social responsibility information disclosure: Does the stock market care?[J]. Accounting & Finance, 2019, 59(11): 57-98.

[10]沈剑. 企业安全会计体系构建研究[D]. 西安科技大学, 2008.

[11]刘琮洁, 刘朝霞. 安全会计应用与安全信息披露研究[J]. 商业会计, 2010, 31(16): 18-19.

[12]孙雪晨, 张林. 上市公司社会责任信息披露问题探析[J]. 商业经济, 2014, 33(22):121-122.

[13]陈建芸, 严云娇. 上市公司社会责任信息披露对财务绩效的影响研究[J]. 现代商业, 2016, 11(29):149.

[14]栾麒. 我国安全会计信息披露研究综述[J]. 财会学习, 2018, 13(32): 75-77.

[15]李恩柱, 朱琼. 高危行业上市公司安全会计信息披露现状分析[J]. 会计之友, 2010, 28(02): 90-92.

[16]李恩柱, 杨立永. 我国上市公司安全会计信息披露现状及问题分析[J]. 齐鲁珠坛, 2014, 35(06): 12-15.

[17]李明. 高危行业上市公司安全会计信息披露研究综述[J]. 财会学习, 2017, 12(09): 78-79.

[18]张卫锋. 浅析专项储备会计业务处理的特殊性——以煤炭企业安全费用为例[J]. 财会学习, 2019, 14(23): 94-95.

[19]杨立永. 企业安全会计信息披露影响因素研究[D]. 山东财经大学, 2015.

[20]陈香兰. 高危行业上市公司安全会计信息披露问题及对策研究[J]. 财会学习, 2017, 12(18): 88-89.

[21]囤秀秀, 张波. 新三板挂牌公司商业模式信息披露质量研究[J]. 财会月刊, 2020, 41(13): 74-82.

[22]肖土盛, 宋顺林, 李路. 信息披露质量与股价崩盘风险:分析师预测的中介作用[J]. 财经研究, 2017, 43(02): 110-121.

[23]杨静. 会计信息披露与企业绩效关系的研究综述[J]. 中国商论, 2018, 27(06): 133-135.

[24]王健忠. “能说就要说”还是“能不说就不说”——自愿性信息披露与企业创新[J]. 北京社会科学, 2018, 33(01): 40-56.

[25]张月兰, 徐静雅, 沙莹莹. 环境信息披露质量对企业创新的影响研究[J]. 长春师范大学学报, 2021, 40(10): 116-124.

[26]刘琨, 徐嘉威, 谭雯. 女性和党员比例与环境会计信息披露质量关系研究——以云南省上市公司为例[J]. 财务管理研究, 2021, 70(11): 48-54.

[27]朱鹏, 张亚澜. 科创板企业招股说明书的文本信息披露质量分析与评价[J]. 财会月刊, 2022, 43(06): 76-82.

[28]贺宝成, 吴雨桐, 任佳. 自然资源资产离任审计如何影响企业环境信息披露质量[J]. 财会月刊, 2022, 43(05): 69-78.

[29]Fisher. The relationship between corporate social responsibility disclosure and corporate governance characteristics in Malaysian public listed companies[J]. Social Responsibility Journal, 1906, 11(05): 212-216.

[30]Tam King Univ. Valuation of a construction company[M]. Boston, 2015.

[31]Tom Copeland, Tim Koller, Jack Merlin. Valuation: Measuring and managing the value of companies[J]. Mc Kinsey & Company, 2017, 23(32): 428.

[32]Vayas Ortega Germania, Soguero Ruiz Cristina.On the differential analysis of enterprise valuation methods as a guideline for Unlisted companies assessment: Empowering discounted cash flow valuation[J]. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10(17):115-120.

[33]Li Ximei.Research on value assessment of scientific and technological enterprises based on BP neural network[J]. IOP Conference Series:Materials Science and Engineering, 2020, 35(02): 75-83.

[34]Kamstra. The Impact of corporate social responsibility disclosure on corporate reputation:a non-professional stakeholder perspective[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2016, 151(02): 112-118.

[35]Aswath. Methodological Themes: Constructing a research database of social and environmental reporting by UK companies[J]. Accounting Auditing and Accountability Journal, 2016, 16(09): 8-12.

[36]Jennifer Francis. Enterprise Value[J]. Palgrave Macmillan, 2018, 12(3): 35-39.

[37]Andreas Schuler. Zur kapitalwertorientierten Bewertung von immateriellen Vermgenswerten in der intemationalen Rechnungslegung[J]. Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift fur betxiebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 2020, 43(03): 371-396.

[38]王建中, 李海英. 基于自由现金流量的公司价值评估[J]. 中国总会计师, 2019, 17(12): 42-45.

[39]姜毅. 基于自由现金流量折现模型的上市公司价值评估——以青岛啤酒为例[J]. 价值工程, 2019, 38(32): 1-4.

[40]刘欣童. FCFF模型在伊利企业价值评估中的应用[J]. 河北企业, 2020, 32(02): 24-25.

[41]张晓慧, 孔淑慧. 相对估值指标在中国股票市场的有效性研究[J]. 国际商务, 2015, 29(2): 57-67.

[42]贾延娜. 市场法在证券公司并购估值中的应用研究[D]. 北京交通大学, 2016.

[43]董依敏. 基于市场法的碧水源企业价值评估研究[J]. 现代营销, 2020, 28(02): 213.

[44]赵安然. 线上美术作品版权价值评估市场法探析[J]. 商讯, 2020, 38(31): 149-150.

[45]朱曦, 赵虹, 肖力. 基于多元线性回归的市场法企业价值评估研究——S公司收购欧元区某国B企业涉及的B企业全部股东权益价值评估案例分析[J]. 中国资产评估, 2021, 26(04): 69-81.

[46]Schadewit, Niskala. Disclosure and the loan spread on private debt[J]. Financial Analysts Journal, 2015, 61(03):83-95.

[47]Liu Xiang, Zhang Chen. Corporate governance, Social responsibility information Disclosure, and Enterprise Value in China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 142(10): 75-84.

[48]Ayat Karaja, Emad Al Shikh, Israa Mansour. Impact of applying social responsibility accounting on companies' financial performance[J]. European Journal of Business and Management, 2019, 11(15): 113-119.

[49]Lyndon M.Etale, Ayaundu E.Sawyerr. Social responsibility accounting and profitability of dangote cement PLC listed in the NSE[J]. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 2020, 7(05):23-27.

[50]Barnett M L, Salomon R M. Does it pay to be really good?Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2016, 33(11): 1304-1320.

[51]Plumlee M. Earnings, book value and dividends in valuation[J]. Contemporary Accounting Research, 2019, 11(02): 661-687.

[52]Feng Bo, Cheng Liting. Study on enterprise value evaluation based on ESG:Taking Tesla enterprise as an example[J]. Canadian Social Science, 2022, 18(01).61-74.

[53]陈西婵. 社会责任会计信息披露对企业价值创造影响的实证分析[J]. 工业技术经济, 2018, 38(12): 120-126.

[54]郭子悦. 煤炭与建材行业上市公司社会责任会计信息披露与市场价值相关性研究[J]. 统计科学与实践, 2018, 37(07): 12-13.

[55]刘栩萌. 社会责任会计信息披露对企业价值的影响——以陕西省上市公司例[J]. 西安工程大学学报, 2018, 33(6): 776-78.

[56]朱清香. 社会责任会计信息披露、市场化进程与企业价值——来自中国化学制品行业上市公司的经验证据[J]. 中国注册会计师, 2019, 31(02): 53-57.

[57]汤小芳. 信息披露质量对资产价格波动的影响研究——基于会计稳健性视角的分析[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2020, 40(09): 115-118.

[58]徐光华, 卓瑶瑶, 张艺萌. ESG信息披露会提高企业价值吗?[J]. 财会通讯, 2022, 43(04): 33-37.

[59]董淑兰, 王成. 社会责任会计信息披露质量、股权融资成本和企业价值[J]. 商业会计, 2016, 47(19): 28-31.

[60]曾晓, 韩金红. 社会责任信息披露、行业性质与企业价值——基2012-2014年CDP中国报告的实证研究[J]. 财会通讯, 2016, 37(18): 38-41.

[61]李力, 刘全齐. 社会责任会计信息披露对上市公司价值影响的实证研究——以医药制造业为例[J]. 当代经济, 2015, 31(24): 123-125.

[62]滕雨函. 企业价值与社会责任信息披露相关性研究述评[J]. 知识经济, 2019, 21(07): 10-11.

[63]杨璐. 我国上市央企自愿性信息披露与企业价值关系实证研究[J]. 企业研究, 2017, 33(13): 62-65.

[64]张长江. 社会责任会计信息披露与企业价值的实证研究——基于京津冀上市工业企业的经验数据[J]. 商业会计, 2018, 39(04): 4-6.

[65]张玉兰. 机构投资者、社会责任会计信息披露质量与企业价值关系的实证分析[J]. 统计与决策, 2018, 34(12): 162-165.

[66]R. E. Freeman. Strategic Management Stakeholder Approach[M]. Boston: Pitman, 1984.

[67]Sheldon. 《管理哲学》[M]. (刘敬鲁译). 北京: 商务印书馆. 2013.

[68]Bowen. 《商人的社会责任》[M]. (肖红军, 王晓光, 周国银译). 北京: 经济管理出版社. 2015.

[69]Akerlof G A. The Market for "Lemons": Quality uncertainty and the Market mechanism[J]. The quarterly journal of economics, 1970, 84(3): 488-500.

[70]李南海. 企业环境信息披露对自由现金流量的影响[J]. 财会月刊, 2020, 41(02): 83-91.

[71]王德发, 曹素文. 环境责任与企业价值的共存关系研究[J]. 财会通讯, 2020, 41(17): 71-74.

[72]Seong Mi Bae, Hyoung-Tae An, Jong Dae Kim. Mediators linking information quality and the cost of equity capital[J]. Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Study, 2020, 49(3): 410-437.

[73]朱清香, 马焕超, 郭欢. 企业环境责任履行对权益资本成本的影响研究——基于产权性质及行业性质的分析[J]. 会计之友, 2019, 37(07): 127-132.

[74]徐文娟, 史兴松. 近十年SSCI期刊工商管理研究中内容分析法的应用[J]. 情报探索, 2020, 34(06): 123-131.

[75]张萌. 浅谈内容分析法在企业管理研究中的应用[J]. 商讯, 2020, 38(01): 103-104.

[76]刘桐. 安全会计信息披露水平与权益资本成本[J]. 财会学习, 2016, 11(18): 84-85+95.

[77]郑玲, 杨淑兰, 钱子龙. 公司治理、财务状况与安全会计信息披露[J]. 财会通讯, 2011, 31(30): 91-93+145.

[78]张晓红, 马广奇. 基于现金流量折现法的企业价值评估研究——以康佳集团为例[J]. 财会通讯, 2013, 33(32): 87-89.

[79]蔡文春. 基于自由现金流量的企业并购协同价值估算[J]. 财会通讯, 2016, 36(29): 11-14.

[80]陈绿荫. 收益法在物流上市企业价值评估中的应用研究[D].暨南大学,2016

中图分类号:

 F279.27    

开放日期:

 2022-06-16    

无标题文档

   建议浏览器: 谷歌 火狐 360请用极速模式,双核浏览器请用极速模式