经济全球化的不断推进及社会公众意识与期望的增强使中国海外承包业务逐渐增多，越来越多的承包企业试图进入国际市场。企业社会责任是企业为利益相关者做出的负责任的承诺与行为，其不仅成为中国对外工程承包企业进入国际市场的必要举措，还成为企业在全球化进程中平衡挑战和机遇时的优势。企业社会绩效是企业将社会责任融入到日常行为中，从而给社会和环境带来可持续的积极影响效益。尽管中国对外工程承包企业已从理念与实践方面推进企业社会责任建设，然而其企业社会绩效表现却不佳，项目质量不合格、环境安全不达标、劳工利益受损等问题仍旧存在。中国对外工程承包企业是中国海外企业的一面旗帜，社会责任实践关系到承包企业社会绩效的健康发展，也关系到中国对外工程行业的转型升级。因此，本文试图通过探索中国对外工程承包企业社会责任实践与企业社会绩效之间的联系，探索二者之间的影响机理，使企业在应对利益相关者需求时，能够更有效地配置并利用有限的资源实现企业社会绩效最大化。

本研究主要基于利益相关者理论、企业资源观理论、社会交换理论以及社会网络理论，分析企业社会责任实践与企业社会绩效之间的关系网络。首先，通过文献研究法对已有研究进行梳理，以识别出本文涉及的中国对外工程承包企业社会责任实践与企业社会绩效初步内容。其次，通过专家访谈法和问卷调查法形成了适用于本研究情景的初始问卷，基于专家意见与预调研数据将修正后的问卷用于正式调研。本文主要借助网络平台发放在线问卷进行数据收集，调研对象为中国对外工程承包企业的管理人员。回收的问卷在进行剔除与筛选后总共获得355份有效样本。最后，利用SPSS26.0、UCINET对有效样本数据进行分析与检验。

研究结果表明了每项企业社会责任实践与企业社会绩效之间的联系。其中，核心的企业社会责任实践有“提高技术研发投资”、“帮助合作伙伴提升产能和技术”、“提前评估项目对社区的影响”、“保护行业知识产权”、“将社会责任标准纳入合作合同”、“组织员工参与生态保护活动”以及“建立合规经营制度”。核心企业社会绩效则是“促进行业技术创新”、“企业声誉”、“创新资源增多”、“污染排放减少”、“当地社区进步”以及“能源消耗减少”。中国对外工程承包企业社会责任实践与企业社会绩效社会网络呈现出“three-keys”的网络特征。从核心/外围结构分析，相较于外围区域的企业社会责任实践，处于核心区域的3项CSR实践与9项企业社会绩效具有更密切的联系。因此，本文提出了相应的建议，以此帮助中国对外工程承包企业部署企业社会责任资源协作方案提供有益参考，为实现利益相关者的“共享价值”做出一定的理论贡献。

The ongoing progression of economic globalization and the heightened societal awareness and expectations have resulted in a surge in the number of international construction projects. An increasing number of China international contractors are endeavoring to penetrate the international market.Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is the responsible commitment and behavior of a corporation for its stakeholders. CSR has evolved into not only an essential prerequisite for Chinese enterprises engaged in international construction project to access global markets, but also a strategic advantage enabling them to navigate the challenges and opportunities inherent in the process of globalization. Corporate social performance (CSP) pertains to the incorporation of social responsibility into a corporation's daily operations, resulting in sustainable and beneficial impacts on society and the environment. Although Chinese international contractors has promoted CSR practice, its CSP is poor. The problems such as substandard project quality, lack of safety and environmental protection, and infringement of labor rights and interests still exist.As a flag of China's overseas enterprises, the CSR of Chinese international contractor is related to the healthy development of the global contracting market and the transformation and upgrading of the contracting industry. Therefore, this paper seeks to explore the links between the CSR practices and CSP of Chinese international contractors, so that the corporations can configure and utilize the limited resources more effectively to maximize CSP.

Based on stakeholder theory, enterprise resource view theory, social exchange theory and social network theory, this study mainly analyzes the relationship network between CSR practices and CSP. First, the literature research method was used to sort out the existing research to preliminarily determine content of CSR practices and CSP of Chinese international contractors. Second, the initial questionnaire suitable for this research was formed through expert interview and questionnaire survey, and the revised questionnaire was used for formal investigation based on expert opinions and pre-survey data. The data collection was mainly conducted by distributing online questionnaires, and a total of 355 valid questionnaires were collected after removing and screening the recovered questionnaires. Finally, SPSS26.0 and UCINET were used for analysis and testing of the valid sample data.

The results of the study show the relationship between each CSR practice and CSP. The key CSR practices are "Increase investment in technology research and development", "Help partners improve production capacity and technology", "Assess the impact of projects on the community in advance", "Protect industry intellectual property rights", "Include social responsibility standards in cooperation agreements", "Organize employees to participate in environmental protection activities", and "Establish a compliance management system". The core CSP include "Promote technological innovation in the industry", "Corporate reputation", "Increase resources for innovation", "Reduce pollutant emissions", "Improve the local community" and "Reducing energy consumption". The social network of CSR practices and CSP of Chinese international contractors presents the "three-keys" network characteristics. In the core-periphery structure, the 3 practices and in the core region are more closely related to CSP than those in the periphery region. Therefore, this paper demonstrates the network characteristics of CSR practices and CSP of Chinese international contractors. It also provides useful reference for corporations in the deployment of CSR resource cooperation programs, and makes some theoretical contributions to the realization of "shared value" of stakeholders.

[1]Loosemore M, Lim B T H, Ling F Y Y, et al. A comparison of corporate social responsibility practices in the Singapore, Australia and New Zealand construction industries[J]. Journal of cleaner production, 2018, 190: 149-159.

[2]Hu M M, Zhang C B, Dong L, et al. Economical pillar of sustainability assessment on resource circulation-development and application of life cycle costing approach[J]. China Environmental Science, 2018, 38(12): 4788-4800.

[3]Guo H, Lu W. How Do Chinese International Construction Companies View Corporate Social Responsibility? [C]//Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate. Springer Singapore, 2021: 1407-1419.

[4]Ye M, Lu W, Flanagan R, et al. Corporate social responsibility “glocalisation”: Evidence from the international construction business[J]. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2020, 27(2): 655-669.

[5]Engineering News-Record. ENR’s 2022 Top 250 International Contractors 1-100 [EB/OL]. https://www.enr.com/toplists/2022-Top-250-International-Contractors-Preview.

[6]Zhang Q, Oo B L, Lim B T H. Unveiling corporate social responsibility awareness and implementation: a study of the Chinese construction firms[J]. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2022a: 1-29.

[7]Wang H, Lu W, Ye M, et al. The curvilinear relationship between corporate social performance and corporate financial performance: Evidence from the international construction industry[J]. Journal of cleaner production, 2016, 137: 1313-1322.

[8]Albasu J, Nyameh J. Relevance of stakeholders theory, organizational identity theory and social exchange theory to corporate social responsibility and employees performance in the commercial banks in Nigeria[J]. International journal of business, economics and management, 2017, 4(5): 95-105.

[9]Van der Kroft B, Bams W F M, Maas K E H. Heterogeneous CSR approaches, corporate social performance and corporate financial performance[J]. 2021.

[10]de Villiers C, Jia J, Li Z. Corporate social responsibility: A review of empirical research using Thomson Reuters Asset4 data[J]. Accounting & Finance, 2022, 62(4): 4523-4568.

[11]Brahmana R K, Brahmana R K, Fei Ho T C. Training and development policy, corporate governance, and firm performance[J]. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 2018, 20(1): 59-87.

[12]Lin X, Ho C M F, Shen G Q P. Research on corporate social responsibility in the construction context: a critical review and future directions[J]. International Journal of Construction Management, 2018, 18(5): 394-404.

[13]Porter M E, Kramer M R. The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility[J]. Harvard business review, 2006, 84(12): 78-92.

[14]Chernev A, Blair S. Doing well by doing good: The benevolent halo of corporate social responsibility[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2015, 41(6): 1412-1425.

[15]Doane D. Beyond corporate social responsibility: minnows, mammoths and markets[J]. Futures, 2005, 37(2-3): 215-229.

[16]Juscius V, Jonikas D. Integration of CSR into value creation chain: Conceptual framework[J]. Engineering economics, 2013, 24(1): 63-70.

[17]Korschun D, Bhattacharya C B, Swain S D. Corporate social responsibility, customer orientation, and the job performance of frontline employees[J]. Journal of marketing, 2014, 78(3): 20-37.

[18]Penrose E T. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm[M]. Oxford university press, 2009.

[19]Saglam Y C, Çankaya S Y, Golgeci I, et al. The role of communication quality, relational commitment, and reciprocity in building supply chain resilience: A social exchange theory perspective[J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2022, 167: 102936.

[20]Zhang W, Fei D. Differentiation in Emotional Investments in Work Groups among Different Social Status of Construction Industry Practitioners: A Perspective from the Social Exchange Theory[J]. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022, 2022.

[21]Kotler P, Lee N. Best of breed: When it comes to gaining a market edge while supporting a social cause,“corporate social marketing” leads the pack[J]. Social marketing quarterly, 2005, 11(3-4): 91-103.

[22]Dhaliwal D S, Li O Z, Tsang A, et al. Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting[J]. The accounting review, 2011, 86(1): 59-100.

[23]Turban D B, Greening D W. Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees[J]. Academy of management journal, 1997, 40(3): 658-672.

[24]Farooq O, Payaud M, Merunka D, et al. The impact of corporate social responsibility on organizational commitment: Exploring multiple mediation mechanisms[J]. Journal of business ethics, 2014, 125: 563-580.

[25]杜杏华,刘昌玮.基于新制度主义视角的我国中小企业履行社会责任动机研究[J/OL].企业经济,2023(10):74-84.

[26]孔维伟,陈子涵.制度距离对海外投资企业社会责任的影响研究[J].财会通讯,2023(19):78-83.

[27]雷钦华,苏时鹏.绿色乐善的企业未来经济绩效会更高吗？——来自上市公司的经验证据[J].资源开发与市场,2023,39(10):1333-1342.

[28]谢琳琳,韩婷,胡毅等.我国建筑施工企业社会责任指标体系[J].土木工程与管理学报,2018,35(06):36-42.

[29]张涑贤,雷超.建筑企业社会责任的实证研究[J].企业经济,2013,32(03):62-68.

[30]舒欢,秦丽群,李明钊.大型建筑企业社会责任效率提升模式构建——基于模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)[J].管理现代化,2021,41(04):73-76.

[31]李振宇,刘向伟.CSR:国际工程承包企业发展的新思维[J].国际经济合作,2008(09):46-50.

[32]万冬君,马雪瑞,孙成双.国际工程承包商CSR履行评价指标体系研究[J].北京建筑大学学报,2020,36(01):91-98.

[33]卢健锋.国际工程建筑企业社会责任影响因素研究[J].价值工程,2019,38(24):62-63.

[34]许萍. 国际工程项目社会责任对项目绩效的影响研究[D].山东大学,2016.

[35]付鸿彦,任国升,廉晓洁.战略型社会责任与企业财务绩效的实证研究——基于客户企业社会责任满意度的中介效应[J].会计之友,2018,(24):

[36]辛杰.消费者视角下的企业社会责任研究综述[J].发展研究,2010(11):78-81.

[37]田敏, 李纯青, 萧庆龙.企业社会责任行为对消费者品牌评价的影响[J]. 南开管理评论, 2014, 17(06):19-29.

[38]张思雪,林汉川.创新、社会责任与产品海外形象——来自世界新兴市场的经验证据[J].科研管理,2018,39(12):69-77.

[39]沈铭辉,张中元.中国企业海外投资的企业社会责任——基于案例分析的研究[J].中国社会科学院研究生院学报,2016(02):53-61.

[40]马俊,林珈忻,吴维库.组织心理学视角下以员工为中心的企业社会责任研究进展[J].技术经济,2019,38(04):73-83+128.

[41]王娟,张喆,贾明.员工感知的企业社会责任与反生产行为:基于亲社会动机和内在动机的视角[J].预测,2017,36(05):8-14+23.

[42]王新宇,余明阳,吴开尧.企业社会责任与员工忠诚关系实证研究[J].工业工程与管理,2010,15(05):91-96.

[43]聂军.数字化转型、社会责任履行与企业技术创新绩效[J].技术经济与管理研究,2023(01):50-54.

[44]余浩,季琼岚.企业社会责任对创新绩效的影响研究——基于合法性的中介作用[J].现代管理科学,2021(07):83-93.

[45]冉戎,董迪,胡轩等.抑制或促进：企业社会责任与绿色创新绩效[J].科研管理,2023,44(06):95-106.

[46]韩庆潇,董永超,李强.企业履行社会责任有利于创新绩效提升吗?——基于战略性新兴企业的跨期再检验[J].南京财经大学学报,2023(03):22-32.

[47]伊力奇,李涛,丹二丽等.企业社会责任与环境绩效:“真心”还是“掩饰”?[J].管理工程学报,2023,37(02):1-10.

[48]杨冬云,谢杨.企业社会责任、绿色创新能力与企业环境绩效[J].财会通讯,2019(06):100-104.

[49]李正,宓纯琦.“一带一路”实施过程中的企业社会责任问题及对策[J].财务与会计,2018(03):20-21.

[50]杨学儒,曾馨莹,李浩铭.企业社区参与的研究进展、评析与启示[J].学术研究,2020(08):106-113.

[51]Lin X, Ho C M F, Shen G Q P. Research on corporate social responsibility in the construction context: a critical review and future directions[J]. International Journal of Construction Management, 2018, 18(5): 394-404.

[52]韩予兰. 中国土木工程集团有限公司: 属地化经营助力企地发展[J]. WTO 经济导刊, 2014(02): 52-53.

[53]魏萌,任 旭.海外项目属地化水平评价应用研究[J].工程管理学报,2016,30(05):18-22.

[54]Liao P C, Liao J Q, Wu G, et al. Comparing international contractors' CSR communication patterns: A semantic analysis[J]. Journal of cleaner production, 2018, 203: 353-366.

[55]Xia B, Olanipekun A, Chen Q, et al. Conceptualising the state of the art of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the construction industry and its nexus to sustainable development[J]. Journal of cleaner production, 2018, 195: 340-353.

[56]Olanipekun A O, Oshodi O S, Darko A, et al. The state of corporate social responsibility practice in the construction sector[J]. Smart and sustainable built environment, 2020, 9(2): 91-111.

[57]杨卫.国际工程翻译人员的培养与管理[J].建材世界,2014,35(04):170-174.

[58]林晓彤. 基于价值链的对外承包工程企业战略转型研究[D].北京交通大学,2020.

[59]Sheldon O. The philosophy of Management[J]. Bath, England: Sir Isaac Pitman & Sons, 1923.

[60]Bowen H R. CHA Responsibilities of the Businessman[M]. New York: Harper, 1953.

[61]Friedman. The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits[J]. New York Time Magazine. 1970, 13(13): 122-126.

[62]Carroll A B. The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders[J]. Business horizons, 1991, 34(4): 39-48.

[63]International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2010), “International Standardization Organization (ISO) 26000 Social Responsibility”, International Standardization Organization (ISO), Geneva, Switzerland

[64]袁家方.企业社会责任[M].北京:海洋出版社, 1990.

[65]Carroll A B. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance[J]. Academy of management review, 1979, 4(4): 497-505.

[66]Egemen Wartick S L, Cochran P L. The evolution of the corporate social performance model[J]. Academy of management review, 1985, 10(4): 758-769.

[67]Wood D J. Corporate social performance revisited[J]. Academy of management review, 1991, 16(4): 691-718.

[68]郑海东.企业社会责任行为表现：测量维度、影响因素及对企业绩效的影响[D].浙江大学,2007.

[69]郭倩倩,胡兵.企业社会绩效、营销能力与企业财务绩效——基于2010-2014年中国上市公司的经验证据[J].华东经济管理,2016,30(05):179-184.

[70]张晓宇. 基于AHP的ZSH企业社会绩效评价体系研究[D].西安石油大学,2019.

[71]赵苑. 行政审批制度改革与企业社会绩效[D].重庆大学,2022.

[72]Freeman R E. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach[M]. Cambridge university press,1984

[73]薛鹏.国际工程建筑企业社会责任对企业绩效的影响研究[D].天津大学,2020.

[74]Othman A, Abdellatif M. Partnership for integrating the corporate social responsibility of project stakeholders towards affordable housing development: A South African perspective[J]. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 2011, 9(3): 273-295.

[75]Clarkson M E. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance[J]. Academy of management review, 1995, 20(1): 92-117.

[76]Egemen M, Mohamed A N. Clients’ needs, wants and expectations from contractors and approach to the concept of repetitive works in the Northern Cyprus construction market[J]. Building and Environment, 2006, 41(5): 602-614.

[77]Türkel S, Uzunoğlu E, Kaplan M D, et al. A strategic approach to CSR communication: Examining the impact of brand familiarity on consumer responses[J]. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2016, 23(4): 228-242.

[78]Richard Welford, Executive Compensation, Organizational Effectiveness, CHA Performance and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation[J], Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 1992,Vol.19(1), 25-38.

[79]Davis, Keith, Understanding the CHA Responsibility Puzzle: What Does the Businessman Owe to Society? [J], Business Horizon,1967, Vol.21(3), 45-50.

[80]Abbott, W. F., and Monsen, R. J., On the Measurement of Corporate CHA Responsibility: Self-report Disclosure as a Method of Measuring CHA Involvement[J], Academy of Management Journal,1979, Vol.22(3), 501-515.

[81]常宏建,张体勤,李国锋.项目利益相关者协调度测评研究[J].南开管理评论,2014,17(01):85-94.

[82]Zhao Z Y, Zhao X J, Zuo J, et al. Corporate social responsibility for construction contractors: a China study[J]. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 2016, 14(3): 614-640.

[83]Petrovic‐Lazarevic S. The development of corporate social responsibility in the Australian construction industry[J]. Construction management and Economics, 2008, 26(2): 93-101

[84]Somachandra W, Sylva K K K, Bandara C S, et al. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices in the construction industry of Sri Lanka[J]. International Journal of Construction Management, 2023, 23(13): 2230-2238.

[85]Jiang W, Wong J K W. Key activity areas of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the construction industry: a study of China[J]. Journal of cleaner production, 2016, 113: 850-860.

[86]Barney J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage[J]. Journal of management, 1991, 17(1): 99-120.

[87]ALI S. 企业社会责任对组织绩效的影响：负责任的领导力的调节作用[D].江苏大学,2023.

[88]Shaukat A, Qiu Y, Trojanowski G. Board attributes, corporate social responsibility strategy, and corporate environmental and social performance[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2016, 135: 569-585.

[89]Gouldner A W. The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement[J]. American sociological review, 1960: 161-178.

[90]Kieserling A. Blau (1964): exchange and power in social life[J]. Schlüsselwerke der Netzwerkforschung, 2019: 51-54.

[91]龙永红. 互惠利他链：官民慈善组织资源动员的比较研究[D].南京大学,2012.

[92]涂铭. 产品伤害危机如何影响消费者行为：情绪和动机的视角[D].华中科技大学,2013.

[93]黄慧丹. 平台型企业社会责任感知与顾客忠诚度关系研究[D].浙江工商大学,2021.DOI:10.27462/d.cnki.ghzhc.2021.000013.

[94]Borgatti S P, Everett M G. Network analysis of 2-mode data[J]. Social networks, 1997, 19(3): 243-269.

[95]Tabassum S, Pereira F S F, Fernandes S, et al. Social network analysis: An overview[J]. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2018, 8(5): e1256.

[96]Zhang Q, Oo B L, Lim B T H. Key practices and impact factors of corporate social responsibility implementation: Evidence from construction firms[J]. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 2022b, 30(5): 2124-2154.

[97]Deng X, Low S P, Zhao X, et al. Identifying micro variables contributing to political risks in international construction projects[J]. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 2018, 25(3): 317-334.

[98]Gao L, Luo X, Yang W, et al. Relationship between social support and repatriation intention of expatriates in international construction projects[J]. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 2023, 30(8): 3292-3309.

[99]Lin X, McKenna B, Ho C M F, et al. Stakeholders’ influence strategies on social responsibility implementation in construction projects[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 235: 348-358.

[100]Jones P, Comfort D, Hillier D. Corporate social responsibility and the UK construction industry[J]. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 2006, 19(1): 23-37.

[101]Loosemore M, Reid S. The social procurement practices of tier-one construction contractors in Australia[J]. Construction management and economics, 2019, 37(4): 183-200.

[102]Zeng S, Chen H, Ma H, et al. Governance of social responsibility in international infrastructure megaprojects[J]. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 2022, 9(2): 343.

[103]Ali M H, Zailani S, Iranmanesh M, et al. Impacts of environmental factors on waste, energy, and resource management and sustainable performance[J]. Sustainability, 2019, 11(8): 2443.

[104]Liao P C, Xia N N, Wu C L, et al. Communicating the corporate social responsibility (CSR) of international contractors: Content analysis of CSR reporting[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 156: 327-336.

[105]Wang T K, Zhang Q, Chong H Y, et al. Integrated supplier selection framework in a resilient construction supply chain: An approach via analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and grey relational analysis (GRA)[J]. Sustainability, 2017, 9(2): 289.

[106]潘佳,刘益,王良.企业技术创新与企业社会绩效关系实证研究——基于国有企业和民营企业的分类样本[J].科技进步与对策,2014,31(13):73-77.

[107]Li, X.S.“Exploration on the localization management of Chinese enterprises’ international construction — taking the Dubai market as an example”, Journal of Shijiazhuang Railway University (Social Science Edition), 2021, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 23-26.

[108]Paul J. H. Schoemaker,Raphael Amit.Strategic assets and organizational rent[J].33-46,1993,14(1):33-46.

[109]Aguilera‐Caracuel J, Guerrero‐Villegas J. How corporate social responsibility helps MNEs to improve their reputation. The moderating effects of geographical diversification and operating in developing regions[J]. Corporate social responsibility and environmental management, 2018, 25(4): 355-372.

[110]Sendjaya, S., Development and validation of the short servant leadership behavior scale (SLBS-6). Business Healthcare, 2003.

[111]Zhang Q, Oo B L, Lim B T H. Drivers, motivations, and barriers to the implementation of corporate social responsibility practices by construction enterprises: A review[J]. Journal of cleaner production, 2019, 210: 563-584.

[112]Loosemore M, Lim B T H. Linking corporate social responsibility and organizational performance in the construction industry[J]. Construction management and economics, 2017, 35(3): 90-105.

[113]Chang Y H, Yeh C H. Corporate social responsibility and customer loyalty in intercity bus services[J]. Transport policy, 2017, 59: 38-45.

[114]Xu X, Zeng S, Chen H. Signaling good by doing good: How does environmental corporate social responsibility affect international expansion?[J]. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2018, 27(7): 946-959.

[115]Li Y, Sun H, Li D, et al. Effects of digital technology adoption on sustainability performance in construction projects: The mediating role of stakeholder collaboration[J]. Journal of Management in Engineering, 2022, 38(3): 04022016.

[116]Zhang Q, Oo B L, Lim B T H. Linking corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices and organizational performance in the construction industry: A resource collaboration network[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2022, 179: 106113.

[117]Palacios-Manzano M, Leon-Gomez A, Santos-Jaén J M. Corporate social responsibility as a vehicle for ensuring the survival of construction SMEs. The mediating role of job satisfaction and innovation[J]. IEEE transactions on engineering management, 2021.

[118]Harman H H. Modern factor analysis[M]. University of Chicago press, 1976.

[119]Podsakoff P M, MacKenzie S B, Lee J Y, et al. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies[J]. Journal of applied psychology, 2003, 88(5): 879.

[120]Drahota A, Dewey A. The sociogram: A useful tool in the analysis of focus groups[J]. Nursing research, 2008, 57(4): 293-297.

[121]Fan S L, Chong H Y, Liao P C, et al. Latent provisions for building information modeling (BIM) contracts: A social network analysis approach[J]. KSCE Journal of civil engineering, 2019, 23: 1427-1435.

[122]彭佳迪.基于社会网络分析法的绿色宜居村镇建设利益相关者研究[D].湖南工业大学,2022.

[123]Freeman L C, Roeder D, Mulholland R R. Centrality in social networks: II. Experimental results[J]. Social networks, 1979, 2(2): 119-141.

[124]Malik H A M, Mahesar A W, Abid F, et al. Two-mode network modeling and analysis of dengue epidemic behavior in Gombak, Malaysia[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2017, 43: 207-220.

[125]Besiou M, Van Wassenhove L N. Addressing the challenge of modeling for decision‐making in socially responsible operations[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2015, 24(9): 1390-1401.

[126]Kramer M R, Porter M. Creating shared value[M]. Boston, MA, USA: FSG, 2011.

[127]Cheung D K K, Welford R J, Hills P R. CSR and the environment: business supply chain partnerships in Hong Kong and PRDR, China[J]. Corporate social responsibility and environmental management, 2009, 16(5): 250-263.

[128]Smith, V., Lau, J., & Dumay, J. (2022). Shareholder use of CSR reports: an accountability perspective. Meditari Accountancy Research, 30(6), 1658-1679.

[129]ACS,2022. INTEGRATED REPORT ACS GROUP 2022. Actividades de Construcciones y Servicios, Madrid, Spanish. Available from website: https://www.grupoacs.com/ficheros_editor/File/03_accionistas_inversores/03_informe_anual/INFORME%20INTEGRADO%202022_ENG.pdf.