论文中文题名: | 制造业企业供应链整合对财务绩效影响的实证研究 |
姓名: | |
学号: | 19202098071 |
保密级别: | 公开 |
论文语种: | chi |
学科代码: | 120201 |
学科名称: | 管理学 - 工商管理 - 会计学 |
学生类型: | 硕士 |
学位级别: | 管理学硕士 |
学位年度: | 2022 |
培养单位: | 西安科技大学 |
院系: | |
专业: | |
研究方向: | 财务管理理论与实务 |
第一导师姓名: | |
第一导师单位: | |
论文提交日期: | 2022-06-14 |
论文答辩日期: | 2022-06-08 |
论文外文题名: | An Empirical Study on the Impact of Supply Chain Integration on Financial Performance of Manufacturing Enterprises |
论文中文关键词: | |
论文外文关键词: | Supplier integration ; Customer integration ; Internal integration ; Financial performance |
论文中文摘要: |
《中国制造2025》提出了实现制造业强国的目标,“十四五”规划和2035年远景目标纲要再次强调要深入实施制造强国战略,体现出制造业的重要经济地位。随着市场环境日趋复杂,制造业竞争不断加剧且利润提升难度增加。供应链整合作为一种参与市场竞争的有效模式可以提升企业生产效率,增强企业竞争优势,促进企业可持续发展。基于此,探究制造业企业供应链整合与财务绩效的关系对制造业整体效益的提升和高质量发展具有重要意义。 首先,本文基于相关概念与理论,在系统梳理国内外相关文献的基础上,将供应链整合划分为供应商整合、客户整合和内部整合三个维度,并对供应链整合各维度与财务绩效的关系进行机理分析。其次,选取2011年至2020年沪深两市772家制造业企业为研究样本,采用因子分析法对内部整合进行测算,根据研究假设建立面板数据模型。最后,利用线性回归和中介效应进行实证检验与分析,全面探讨供应链整合与财务绩效的关系,并通过替换财务绩效指标的方式进行稳健性检验。研究结果表明:(1)外部整合正向促进财务绩效,企业通过供应商整合和客户整合可以降低制造成本,扩大市场份额,从而提高财务绩效;(2)内部整合正向影响财务绩效,企业通过内部整合可以提高柔性生产效率,改善管理水平,从而促进财务绩效的提升;(3)内部整合在外部整合与财务绩效的关系中发挥中介作用,进一步探究发现,内部整合在供应商整合与财务绩效、客户整合与财务绩效的关系中存在部分中介效应,且内部整合在客户整合与财务绩效间的中介效应更显著。 基于上述实证结论,本文对企业实施供应链整合提出以下对策建议:第一,完善供应商管理体系,事前建立供应商评估系统,事中提高供应商参与度,事后完善供应商审核;第二,加强客户关系管理,提高企业与客户合作意识及客户参与度;第三,强化内部整合,加强企业全员参与性,并以企业自身内部整合为核心构建从供应商到客户的标准业务流程。 |
论文外文摘要: |
The "Made in China 2025" put forward the goal of becoming a manufacturing power, and the "14th Five-Year Plan" and the outline of the vision for 2035 once again emphasized the in-depth implementation of the strategy of becoming a manufacturing power, reflecting the important economic status of the manufacturing industry. As the market environment becomes more and more complex, the competition in manufacturing industry becomes increasingly fierce and the difficulty of profit promotion increases. As an effective mode to participate in market competition, supply chain integration can improve the production efficiency of enterprises, enhance their competitive advantages, and promote sustainable development of enterprises. Based on this, it is of great significance to explore the relationship between supply chain integration and financial performance of manufacturing enterprises to improve the overall efficiency and high-quality development of manufacturing industry. First of all, based on relevant concepts and theories and on the basis of systematic review of relevant literature at home and abroad, this paper divides supply chain integration into three dimensions: supplier integration, customer integration and internal integration, and analyzes the relationship between each dimension of supply chain integration and financial performance. Secondly, 772 manufacturing enterprises in Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets from 2011 to 2020 are selected as the research samples. The internal integration is measured by factor analysis method, and the panel data model is established according to the research assumptions. Finally, empirical test and analysis are carried out by using linear regression and mediation effect to comprehensively explore the relationship between supply chain integration and financial performance, and robustness test is carried out by replacing financial performance indicators. The results show that :(1) external integration positively promotes financial performance. Through supplier integration and customer integration, enterprises can reduce manufacturing costs and expand market share, thus improving financial performance; (2) Internal integration has a positive impact on financial performance. Enterprises can improve flexible production efficiency and management level through internal integration, thus promoting the improvement of financial performance; (3) Internal integration plays a mediating role in the relationship between external integration and financial performance. Further investigation shows that internal integration has a partial mediating effect on the relationship between supplier integration and financial performance, customer integration and financial performance, and internal integration has a more significant mediating effect on customer integration and financial performance. Based on the above empirical conclusions, this paper puts forward the following countermeasures and suggestions for enterprises to implement supply chain integration: first, improve the supplier management system, establish a supplier evaluation system in advance, improve supplier participation during the process, and improve supplier audit afterwards; Second, strengthen customer relationship management, improve the awareness of cooperation between enterprises and customers and customer participation; Thirdly, strengthen the internal integration, strengthen the participation of all employees in the enterprise, and take the internal integration of the enterprise itself as the core to build a standard business process from suppliers to customers. |
参考文献: |
[30]陈正林,王彧.供应链集成影响上市公司财务绩效的实证研究[J].会计研究,2014(2):49-95. [31]李艳平,陈正林,朱忆琳.企业供应商、客户关系及供应链整合对现金持有量的影响[J].统计与决策,2016(14):171-174. [32]冯长利,刘洪涛,梅小敏.供应链整合与企业绩效的关系研究—基于Meta分析[J].管理评论,2016,28(11):217-227. [33]郭晓顺,李文婷.供应链集成对电子设备制造业财务绩效影响的实证检验[J].财会月刊,2017(11):55-59. [34]王淑英,肖星野.基于创新资源配置导向的供应链集成与企业技术创新绩效的关系研究[J].科技管理研究,2018,38(11):122-127. [35]王海芳,李娜,陈芮.组织场域、供应链整合与融资绩效:一个理论模型[J].财会通讯,2020(02):21-27. [36]黄节根,吉祥熙,李元旭.企业创新战略对经营绩效的影响—以制造型企业供应链整合战略为例[J].科学管理研究,2021,39(01):111-115. [37]李晓明,杨洪焦,王元庆.供应链整合与公司绩效间的关系研究—基于中国制造公司的实证研究[J].当代经济科学,2013,(02):52-60. [38]谢志明,谢青青,易玄.绿色供应链管理对制造企业绩效的影响[J].财经理论与实践,2015,36(01):111-116. [39]杨晓艳,顿妍妍.关系资本、供应链整合与创新绩效关系[J].企业经济,2017,36(07):87-92. [40]旷乐.供应链集成对经营性营运资金管理绩效的影响[J].会计之友,2018(03):95-101. [41]王可,周亚拿.信息化建设、供应链信息分享与企业绩效—基于中国制造业企业的实证研究[J].中国管理科学,2019,27(10):34-43. [42]侯海涛.供应链整合对企业绩效的影响研究—基于质量管理角度[J].商业经济研究,2022,(07):117-121. [43]李咏梅,陈婧钰.环境不确定性、供应链集成与企业财务绩效[J].会计之友,2019(06):119-124. [44]李茜,徐佳铭,熊杰,刘海鑫.企业社会责任一致性对财务绩效的影响研究[J].管理学报,2022,19(02):245-253. [45]郭萌.技术创新投入对企业财务绩效影响的实证研究—来自沪深A股市场的经验证据[J].经济研究导刊,2021(10):66-68. [46]窦鑫丰.企业社会责任对财务绩效影响的滞后效应—基于沪深上市公司面板数据的实证分析[J].产业经济研究,2015(03):74-81. [47]徐晓莉,徐文超.经济政策不确定性、财务柔性与企业财务绩效[J].会计之友,2021(18):49-55. [48]杨汝梁,孙元欣.供应链整合与企业绩效关系的情境性研究—基于企业规模的调节作用[J].现代管理科学,2015(08):100-102. [49]庄伯超,余世清,张红.供应链集中度、资金营运和经营绩效—基于中国制造业上市公司的实证研究[J].软科学,2015,29(03):9-14. [50]付美丽.供应链整合对公司财务绩效的影响研究—基于中国制造业的实证分析[D].山西财经大学,2016. [51]童梦婕.无形资产资本化、非财务指标绩效评价与企业财务绩效[J].财会通讯, 2020(18):35-38. [52]赵刚,许德惠.企业资源对供应商整合及财务绩效的影响[J].科研管理,2017,38(02):135-143. [53]江三良,张晨.企业家精神、产业政策与企业绩效—来自沪深A股制造业上市公司的证据[J].南京审计大学学报,2020,17(84):44-53. [54]韩艳旗,赵晓飞.农产品供应链质量整合对农业企业财务绩效的影响研究[J].商业经济与管理,2021,(12):5-18. [55]杨建华,任芳芳.供应链整合对企业绩效的影响研究—基于农业类上市公司的经验数据[J].会计之友,2018(06):90-94. [56]宋光,王妍,宋少华,施先亮.全渠道零售策略下的供应链整合与企业绩效关系研究[J].管理评论,2019,31(06):238-246. [57]卜妙玲.供应链整合与零售企业绩效:供应链柔性的中介作用[J].商业经济研究,2020(22):121-124. [58]王海林,段彩艳.业务伙伴集中度越高企业绩效越好吗?—基于沪市制造业上市公司的数据[J].财会通讯,2016,(06):42-44. [59]王莉,李殿伟.制造企业供应链整合度与财务绩效的研究[J].东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2016(S1):55-57. [60]许江波,蒋晓浩.供应链集中度、内部控制有效性与上市公司绩效[J].首都经济贸易大学学报,2018,20(04):87-93. [61]齐严.全渠道零售背景下供应链整合对企业绩效的影响[J].中国流通经济,2021,35(10):39-54. [62]鲍群,于博,盛明泉.财务柔性、供应链关系与企业价值—基于新常态背景的实证检验[J].现代财经(天津财经大学学报),2017(10):90-102. [63]蒋庆荣,惠国琴.企业家精神视角下供应链整合影响企业绩效的路径与优化策略[J].南通大学学报(社会科学版),2018,34(01):131-135. [64]冯自钦,李虹亮.供应链集成对汽车制造业上市公司绩效的影响[J].财会月刊,2019(09):44-49. [65]赵晓飞,鲁楠.农产品供应链整合对公司绩效的影响—基于全渠道模式的研究视角[J].北京工商大学学报(社会科学版),2021,36(05):51-63. [66]刘华明,王勇,李后建.伙伴关系、物流能力与供应链整合关系研究[J].中国管理科学,2016,24(12):148-157. [67]曾敏刚,林倩,潘焕雯,朱佳.信息技术能力、信任与供应链整合的关系研究[J].管理评论,2017,29(12):217-225+257. [68]陈宏明,张畅.上市公司客户集中度与盈利能力实证研究—来自创业板制造业的经验证据[J].会计之友,2017,(07):37-41. [69]李欢,郑杲娉,李丹.大客户能够提升上市公司业绩吗?—基于我国供应链客户关系的研究[J].会计研究,2018,(04):58-65. [70]任立改.战略导向、绿色管理与企业财务绩效[J].财会通讯,2021,(06):61-65. [73]冯长利,张明月,刘洪涛,张慧中,何明海.供应链知识共享与企业绩效关系研究—供应链敏捷性的中介作用和环境动态性的调节作用[J].管理评论,2015,27(11):181-191. [74]简兆权,曾经莲,刘艳.服务供应链外部整合对企业运营绩效的影响机理分析—被调节的中介效应[J].管理评论,2021,33(08):290-301. [77]刘端,朱颖,王竹青,李胜勇.客户关系集中度对企业财务绩效的影响—基于三大有形资源效率的中介效应[J].系统管理学报,2018,27(06):1044-1053. [79]孙晓波,骆温平.供应链整合维度间互动关系研究[J].运筹与管理,2014,23(05):17-26. [80]孙晓波,骆温平.供应链整合与客户服务运作绩效的关系[J].中国流通经济,2014,28(02):76-82. [81]薛爽,耀友福,王雪方.供应链集中度与审计意见购买[J].会计研究,2018(08):57-64. |
中图分类号: | F272.5 |
开放日期: | 2022-06-15 |