论文中文题名: | 会计师事务所审计失败案例研究——以瑞华审计索菱股份为例 |
姓名: | |
学号: | 19302220102 |
保密级别: | 公开 |
论文语种: | chi |
学科代码: | 125300 |
学科名称: | 管理学 - 会计 |
学生类型: | 硕士 |
学位级别: | 管理学硕士 |
学位年度: | 2022 |
培养单位: | 西安科技大学 |
院系: | |
专业: | |
研究方向: | 审计理论与实务 |
第一导师姓名: | |
第一导师单位: | |
论文提交日期: | 2022-06-15 |
论文答辩日期: | 2022-06-07 |
论文外文题名: | A Case Study of Audit Failure of Accounting Firms——An Example of Ruihua's Audit of Soling Co., Ltd. |
论文中文关键词: | |
论文外文关键词: | Audit Failed ; Financial Failures ; Accounting Firm ; Precautionary Measures |
论文中文摘要: |
近年来,随着我国资本市场的快速发展,上市企业的数量大幅增加,与之而来的财务造假事件也频频发生。而会计师事务所在进行审计时,却未能及时、有效地发现并揭露被审计单位的这些财务舞弊行为,从而引发了一系列的审计失败事件。因审计失败而受到我国证监会处罚的会计师事务所以及注册会计师也引起了社会各界的广泛关注和思考。通过查阅近十年我国证监会官方网站公开披露的相关信息,并对其进行统计后发现,因审计失败被证监会行政处罚的案件有39起,其中一共涉及19家会计师事务所和92名注册会计师。连年频发的审计失败案件,不仅给会计师事务所和注册会计师造成了一定经济和声誉等方面的影响,也引发了预期财务报表使用者、分析师以及社会公众对会计师事务所的信任危机。这也使得对会计师事务所审计失败的原因及防范对策进行研究变得刻不容缓。 本文在对国内外审计失败的相关文献进行梳理的基础上,选取瑞华对索菱股份审计失败的案例为研究对象,深入剖析我国会计师事务所审计失败的成因及防范对策。首先,界定了审计失败和审计质量的定义,并对相关理论进行阐述。其次,基于证监会发布的行政处罚书,主要从审计失败的处罚数量和原因两方面对我国审计失败的现状进行分析。再次,对瑞华审计索菱股份的案例进行回顾,并对索菱股份财务舞弊的手段、瑞华审计过程中存在的问题以及审计失败的原因进行具体分析。最后,基于上述分析,从会计师事务所、注册会计师以及外部监管环境三个层面提出防范对策,指出会计师事务所应不断加强审计业务质量控制和分所的管理力度;注册会计师需严格执行审计程序,全面进行风险识别与评估,并在审计过程中时刻保持职业怀疑和独立性,不断提升专业胜任能力;外部监管需加强处罚力度,缩短处罚周期,健全交叉空白地带的监管。 本文通过对瑞华审计索菱股份失败的案例进行深入研究,分析了会计师事务所不断发生审计失败的原因,并提出防范措施,期望能为缓解当前会计师事务所审计失败频发的情形提供一定参考。 |
论文外文摘要: |
In recent years, with the rapid development of China's capital market, the number of listed enterprises has increased significantly, and the financial fraud incidents that come with it have also occurred frequently.However, when the accounting firm conducted the audit, it failed to timely and effectively discover and expose these financial frauds of the audited unit, which triggered a series of audit failures. Accounting firms and certified public accountants who have been punished by China's securities regulatory commissions for failing audits have also attracted widespread attention and thinking from all walks of life. Through consulting the relevant information publicly disclosed on the official website of China's Securities Regulatory Commission in the past ten years and counting it, it was found that there were 39 cases of administrative penalties imposed by the CSRC due to audit failure, of which a total of 19 accounting firms and 92 certified public accountants were involved. The frequent occurrence of audit failure cases over the years has not only caused certain economic and reputational impacts on accounting firms and certified public accountants, but also triggered a crisis of trust in accounting firms by users of expected financial statements, analysts and the public. This also makes it urgent to study the reasons for the failure of the audit of accounting firms and the countermeasures for prevention. On the basis of sorting out the relevant literature on audit failures at home and abroad, this paper selects the cases of Ruihua's audit failure of Soling shares as the research object, and deeply analyzes the causes and preventive countermeasures of audit failures of accounting firms in China. First, the definitions of audit failure and audit quality are defined, and the relevant theories are elaborated. Secondly, based on the administrative penalty letter issued by the CSRC, the current situation of audit failure in China is mainly analyzed from the two aspects of the number and reasons for audit failure. Third, the case of Ruihua's audit of Soling shares is reviewed, and the means of financial fraud of Soling shares, the problems existing in the audit process of Ruihua shares, and the reasons for audit failure are specifically analyzed. Finally, based on the above analysis, from the three levels of accounting firms, certified public accountants and external regulatory environment, preventive countermeasures are proposed, pointing out that accounting firms should continuously strengthen the quality control of audit business and the management of branches; certified public accountants need to strictly implement audit procedures, comprehensively identify and assess risks, and maintain professional suspicion and independence at all times in the audit process, and continuously improve professional competence; external supervision needs to strengthen penalties, shorten the penalty cycle, and improve the supervision of cross-blank areas. This paper analyzes the reasons for the continuous failure of audit failures of accounting firms through the in-depth study of the failure of Ruihua Audit Soling Shares, and proposes preventive measures, hoping to provide a certain reference for alleviating the current frequent failure of audits of accounting firms. |
参考文献: |
[1]Arens, J K Loebbecke:张杰明、文善恩等译.当代审计学[M].中国商业出版社,1990.110. [2]Mauts,R.K,Sharaf.H.A.审计理论结构[M].中国商业出版社,1990. [18]De Angelo.Auditor size and audit quality[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economies, 1981:183-199. [25]毛艳羚.基于注册会计师的审计失败原因与对策分析—以莲花味精案为例[J]财会通讯,2016,16:80-82. [26]李杰,佐岩.审计失败的反思与应对——以天丰节能公司审计失败案为例[J].财会通讯, 2018(01):85-88. [27]丁立琪.康美药业审计失败案例分析[J].经济研究导刊,2020,(23):121-122. [28]魏敏哲.审计失败的成因及防范策略分析[J].中国集体经济,2020,(07):65-66. [29]秦荣生.注册会计师审计失败的成因及规避[J].注册会计师通讯,1999(04):25-29. [30]毕小卓.注册会计师审计失败问题研究[J].经贸实践,2016(14):198-200. [31]刘贝贝.注册会计师审计失败的原因及对策分析[J].中国集体经济,2017(03):135-136. [32]李杰.审计失败的反思与应对—以天丰节能公司审计失败案为例[J].财会通讯,2018,1:85-88. [33]陈波.会计师事务所内部治理、产权性质与审计质量——基于我国A股上市公司2008-2010年的数据[J].会计与经济研究,2014,28(05):68-86. [34]王运运,胡本源.会计师事务所忙碌程度与审计质量关系的实证检验——基于突发性审计工作量增加的角度[J].财会月刊,2018(04):138-145. [35]张旺峰.事务所规模、审计任期与审计质量[J].财会月刊,2018(02):135-142. [36]叶陈刚,王云汉.会计师事务所审计失败问题研究[J].会计之友,2020(20):36-42. [37]王静静.从华锐风电审计失败案例看职业怀疑在审计中的运用[J].财务与会计, 2016(16):42-44. [38]闫焕民.签字会计师个人执业经验如何影响审计质量?——来自中国证券市场的经验证据[J].审计与经济研究,2016,31(03):41-52. [39]闫焕民,蒋煦涵,何恩良.审计师工作压力传导与审计质量——基于JD-C模型的理论分析框架[J].当代财经,2016(12):119-127. [40]耿琳.审计判断偏误及控制措施分析[J].财会通讯,2018(34):98-101. [41]谢志华,陶玉侠.内部审计质量及其特征因素对外部审计费用的影响——来自深市主板的经验证据[J].东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2015,17(03):76-84+147. [42]刘启云.注册会计师审计失败原因与应对策略[J].财会通讯,2015(34):117-118. [43]李寿喜,何逸冰.上市公司为何多年出现审计失败——基于航天通信的案例分析[J].会计之友,2017(05):127-130. [44]翁坚克.非公允关联交易审计失败反思[J].财会通讯,2019(01):91-95. [45]张根文,田田,张王飞.注册会计师审计失败与财务舞弊处罚研究——基于财务欺诈聚集理论[J].财会通讯,2016(34):8-10. [46]吴勋,王彦.证券市场审计失败与审计监管——基于证监会2001-2016年处罚公告的分析[J].中国注册会计师,2017(07):86-91. [47]李莫愁.审计准则与审计失败——基于中国证监会历年行政处罚公告的分析[J].审计与经济研究,2017,32(02):56-65. [48]郝玉贵,陈伊宁.会计师事务所连续受罚与审计监管分析——以L会计师事务所为例[J].财会月刊,2018(07):151-155. [49]乔贵涛,高平,赵洪宝.事务所规模、审计行业专长与事务所审计质量传染效应[J].财经理论与实践,2014,35(06):70-77. [50]孔宁宁,李雪.制度环境、会计师事务所转制与审计质量[J].审计与经济研究, 2016,31 (02):33-41. [51]刘婧,刘衍,许金玲,王超凤.基于审计风险的会计师事务所内部治理研究[J].中国注册会计师,2019(04):43-47+3. [52]陈晓刚.新证券法下上市公司财务报表审计对策研究[J].中国注册会计师, 2020 (11): 93-95. [53]于凌云,吴建新.审计判断偏误及其应对策略分析[J].会计之友,2012(29):102-104. [54]李晓慧,周羽杰.对注册会计师职业怀疑缺失的问题分析及建议——以利安达对天丰节能IPO审计失败为例[J].中国注册会计师,2015(11):35-41+3. [55]周萍,项军.上市公司审计失败现状、成因及规避措施——基于2008-2018年证监会处罚决定的统计分析[J].会计之友,2020(02):141-145. [56]杜珊.上市公司审计失败的破窗效应分析——以辉山乳业事件为例[J].中国注册会计师,2017(12):87-90+2. [57]李杰,佐岩.审计失败的反思与应对——以天丰节能公司审计失败案为例[J].财会通讯,2018(01):85-88. [58]邓文涛,平瑷嘉,熊欢欢.内部控制、管理层权力对审计费用影响研究[J].中国注册会计师,2018(05):49-54+3. [59]徐紫明.新形势下如何应对会计师事务所不正当低价竞争[J].中国注册会计师,2020 (11):96-98+3. [60]张连起.把注册会计师的财会监督优势转化为国家治理效能[J].中国注册会计师, 2020(08):10-13. [61]李莫愁,任婧.不痛不痒的行政处罚?——行政处罚与审计意见、审计收费的关系研究[J].会计与经济研究,2017,31(01):84-101. |
中图分类号: | F239 |
开放日期: | 2022-06-15 |