论文中文题名: |
基于元分析的煤矿工人不安全行为研究
|
姓名: |
吴昊坤
|
学号: |
22202230098
|
保密级别: |
公开
|
论文语种: |
chi
|
学科代码: |
125600
|
学科名称: |
管理学 - 工程管理
|
学生类型: |
硕士
|
学位级别: |
工程管理硕士
|
学位年度: |
2025
|
培养单位: |
西安科技大学
|
院系: |
管理学院
|
专业: |
工业工程与管理
|
研究方向: |
人因工程
|
第一导师姓名: |
孙林辉
|
第一导师单位: |
西安科技大学
|
论文提交日期: |
2025-06-17
|
论文答辩日期: |
2025-05-29
|
论文外文题名: |
A meta-analysis-based study of coal miners' unsafe behaviors
|
论文中文关键词: |
元分析 ; 不安全行为 ; 煤矿工人 ; 计划行为理论 ; 结构方程模型
|
论文外文关键词: |
Meta-analysis ; Unsafe behavior ; Coal miners ; Theory of Planned Behavior ; structural equation model
|
论文中文摘要: |
︿
煤矿行业的现代化发展在安全生产领域取得了显著的成效,“群死群伤”的大型事故数量已经明显减少,但煤矿工人不安全行为造成的危害和安全隐患依然存在。煤矿安全领域已形成较为丰富的不安全行为实证研究体系,但是由于研究特征、研究方法等的不同,各独立研究结论存在不一致的情况,本研究以计划行为理论(TPB)为基本框架,构建煤矿工人不安全行为模型,解析其形成机制,厘清各变量间的交互关系,考虑所搜集文献中可能存在的调节变量,通过严格的元分析流程进行假设检验,在得到验证结果的同时,解释部分异质性的来源,最后再结合假设检验的结果,以现实煤矿企业生产为背景,对其进行数据分析,从而对企业安全生产提出符合实际情况的具体对策。
首先,基于计划行为理论,从行为态度、主观规范和知觉行为控制三个维度出发,结合煤矿安全生产特性,系统选取影响煤矿工人不安全行为的关键因素。其次,按照文献纳入标准筛选文献,阅读去重后的1669 篇文献题目,最终得到符合纳入标准的文献 99篇,提供了188条实证样本,包括中文文献 49 篇,英文文献 50 篇。然后,对搜集到的文献进行敏感度分析,以保证其稳健性,利用元分析法验证了各组变量间的主效应假设,针对所选择的调节变量,分别使用亚组分析法和元回归分析法进行验证,以及通过Mplus和R语言软件构建元结构方程模型,验证模型间的中介假设,同时根据验证的结果进行数据分析,为后文的改善策略提供依据。
最后,根据煤矿工人不安全行为模型假设的验证和数据分析,为企业改善不安全行为提供思路分析,在煤矿企业改善煤矿工人不安全行为和维持企业正常运作两方面提出针对性的建议,研究结果既验证了前人的研究结论,又对有异质性的结果提供了解释,同时也为煤矿工人不安全行为领域后续的研究提供了一定的思路
﹀
|
论文外文摘要: |
︿
The modernization and development of the coal mining industry has achieved remarkable results in the field of production safety, and the number of large-scale accidents with “mass deaths and injuries” has been significantly reduced, but the hazards and safety hazards caused by the unsafe behaviors of coal miners still exist. A rich empirical research system on unsafe behaviors has been formed in the field of coal mine safety, but due to the differences in research characteristics and methods, there are inconsistencies in the conclusions of independent studies. This study takes the theory of planned behavior (TPB) as the basic framework, constructs a theoretical model of coal miners' unsafe behaviors, analyzes the formation mechanism, clarifies the interactive relationship between variables, considers the possible existence of moderating variables in the collected literature, and analyzes the relationship between variables through a rigorous meta-analysis. moderating variables, carry out hypothesis testing through a strict meta-analysis process, explain the source of partial heterogeneity while obtaining the validation results, and finally combine the results of the hypothesis testing with the real coal mine enterprise production as the background to analyze the data, so as to propose an unsafe behavior improvement strategy for the enterprise's safe production in line with the actual situation.
First, based on the theory of planned behavior, the key factors affecting coal miners' unsafe behaviors are systematically selected from the three dimensions of behavioral attitudes, subjective norms, and perceptual behavioral control, combined with the characteristics of coal mine safety production. Second, the literature was screened according to the literature inclusion criteria, and 1669 titles of literature were read after de-emphasis, and finally 99 pieces of literature meeting the inclusion criteria were obtained, providing 188 empirical samples, including 49 pieces of literature in Chinese and 50 pieces of literature in English. Then, the collected literature was subjected to sensitivity analysis to ensure its robustness, and the hypothesis of main effects between groups of variables was verified using meta-analysis, and for the selected moderating variables, subgroup analysis and meta-regression analysis were used to verify respectively, as well as constructing meta-structural equation models through Mplus and R language software to verify the mediation hypothesis between models, and at the same time, the data were analyzed based on the results of the verification that provides the basis for the improvement strategies in the later paper.
Finally, based on the validation of the assumptions of the model of coal miners' unsafe behavior and data analysis, it provides an analysis of the ideas for enterprises to improve unsafe behavior, and puts forward targeted suggestions in both the improvement of coal miners' unsafe behavior in coal mining enterprises and the maintenance of normal operation of the enterprises, and the results of the study not only validate the conclusions of the previous studies, but also provide an explanation for the results with heterogeneity, and also provide some ideas for the subsequent research provides certain ideas.
﹀
|
参考文献: |
︿
[1]王海军,王帅.新形势下煤矿采矿安全管理工作[J].当代化工研究,2024,(10):188-190. [2]赵庆国.建设智能煤矿促进煤炭高质量发展[N].中国经济导报,2024-06-15(002). [3]张培森,张晓乐,董宇航,等.2008—2021年我国煤矿事故规律分析及预测研究[J].矿业安全与环保,2023,50(02):136-140+146. [4]张尧,尧春洪,田应祥,等.我国煤炭行业事故统计分析研究[J].采矿技术,2024,24(02):254-258. [5]燕勇,栗继祖.智能化变革背景下矿工工作压力对风险行为的影响研究[J].煤矿安全,2021,52(08):253-258. [6]REASON J. Human error: models and management[J]. Bmj, 2000, 320(7237): 768-770. [7]傅贵,李宣东,李军.事故的共性原因及其行为科学预防策略[J].安全与环境学报,2005,(01):80-83. [8]田水承,刘芬,杨禄,等.基于计划行为理论的矿工不安全行为研究[J].矿业安全与环保,2014,41(01):109-112. [9]栗继祖,王晓佳.矿工主观幸福感与不安全行为研究[J].中国煤炭,2017,43(05):125-129. [10]CARD N A. Applied meta-analysis for social science research[M]. Guilford Press, 2012. [11]张翼,樊耘,赵菁.国外管理学研究中的元分析评介[J].外国经济与管理,2009,31(07):1-8. [12]YANG J, YE G, XIANG Q, et al. Insights into the mechanism of construction workers’ unsafe behaviors from an individual perspective[J]. Safety Science, 2021, 133: 105004. [13]HEINRICH H W. Industrial Accident Prevention. A Scientific Approach[J]. 1941. [14]倪国栋,高富宁,徐恒,等.国内建筑工人不安全行为研究综述[J].工程管理学报,2020,34(01):54-59. [15]张孟春,方东平,佟瑞鹏.脚手架工人低估不安全行为风险的研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2011,21(08):145-150. [16]叶贵,越宏哲,杨晶晶,等.建筑工人认知水平对不安全行为影响仿真研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2019,29(09):36-42. [17]CHEN C F. Personality, safety attitudes and risky driving behaviors—Evidence from young Taiwanese motorcyclists[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2009, 41(5): 963-968. [18]MORROW S L, MCGONAGLE A K, DOVE-STEINKAMP M L, et al. Relationships between psychological safety climate facets and safety behavior in the rail industry: A dominance analysis[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2010, 42(5): 1460-1467. [19]ROWDEN P, MATTHEWS G, WATSON B, et al. The relative impact of work-related stress, life stress and driving environment stress on driving outcomes[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2011, 43(4): 1332-1340. [20]徐辉.电力企业人因安全的研究与应用研究[J].电子测试,2016,(21):162+149. [21]吴声声.电力企业人因安全的研究与应用[D].北京交通大学,2013,1-163. [22]石娟,常丁懿,郑鹏.基于BP神经网络的建筑工人不安全行为预警模型[J].中国安全科学学报,2022,32(01):27-33. [23]LEUNG M, CHAN I Y S, YU J. Preventing construction worker injury incidents through the management of personal stress and organizational stressors[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2012, 48: 156-166. [24]HSU S H, LEE C C, WU M C, et al. A cross-cultural study of organizational factors on safety: Japanese vs. Taiwanese oil refinery plants[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2008, 40(1): 24-34. [25]郝玉双.2003—2021年中国煤矿安全生产事故统计及研究热点分析[J].能源技术与管理,2023,48(01):192-196. [26]HOFMANN D A, STETZER A. The role of safety climate and communication in accident interpretation: Implications for learning from negative events[J]. Academy of management journal, 1998, 41(6): 644-657. [27]李磊,田水承,邓军,等.矿工不安全行为影响因素分析及控制对策[J].西安科技大学学报,2011,31(06):794-798+813. [28]李妙慧,栗继祖.群体动力对矿工不安全行为意向的影响研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2021,31(07):48-55. [29]许正权,张妮,王华清,等.矿工不安全行为的网络传播性分析[J].科技进步与对策,2014,31(11):54-56. [30]安宇, 王袆, 李子琪. 基于TPB的矿工不安全行为形成机制[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(10): 20. [31]成连华,赵帅,吴锋,等.知识型和经验型矿工群体的不安全行为研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2017,27(12):1-7. [32]王家坤,王新华,王晨.基于工作满意度的煤矿员工不安全行为研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2018,28(11):14-20. [33]周孟然,李学松,朱梓伟,等.井下矿工多目标检测与跟踪联合算法[J].工矿自动化,2022,48(10):40-47. [34]曹璐璐,刘艳.有限空间作业人员不安全心理及行为量表研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2020,30(11):37-42. [35]YOU M, LI S, LI D, et al. Study on the influencing factors of miners’ unsafe behavior propagation[J]. Frontiers in psychology, 2019, 10: 2467. [36]YANG L, WANG X, ZHU J, et al. Influencing factors, formation mechanism, and pre-controlmethods of coal miners′ unsafe behavior: A systematic literature review[J]. Frontiers in public health, 2022, 10: 792015. [37]CHENG L, GUO H, LIN H. The influence of leadership behavior on miners’ work safety behavior[J]. Safety science, 2020, 132: 104986. [38]HARRISON F. Getting started with meta‐analysis[J]. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2011, 2(1): 1-10. [39]GLASS G V. Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research[J]. Educational researcher,1976, 5(10): 3-8. [40]黄月,曲新婷,董艳.面向小学数学的思维能力训练有效果吗?—基于51篇国内外实证研究的元分析[J].现代教育技术,2024,34(06):91-99. [41]綦萌,舒子夕,董玉杰,等.基于元分析的团队断裂带与团队创新的关系研究[J].科技管理研究,2022,42(23):134-141. [42]齐奥每倩,栗继祖.基于JD-R模型的矿工反生产行为研究的元分析[J].矿业研究与开发,2023,43(09):201-208. [43]刘娜,张峻菖,张生太,等.基于元分析的自动驾驶技术用户采纳研究[J].北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版),2021,23(02):1-10. [44]ARCELUS J, BOUMAN W P, VAN DEN NOORTGATE W, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence studies in transsexualism[J]. European Psychiatry, 2015, 30(6): 807-815. [45]EAGLY A H, MAKHIJANI M G, KLONSKY B G. Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis[J]. Psychological bulletin, 1992, 111(1): 3. [46]陈伟珂,武晓燕.基于突变理论的建筑工人不安全行为研究[J].安全与环境学报,2017,17(05):1838-1843. [47]AJZEN I. Perceived behavioral control, self‐efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior 1[J]. Journal of applied social psychology, 2002, 32(4): 665-683. [48]赵斌,栾虹,李新建,等.科技人员创新行为产生机理研究——基于计划行为理论[J].科学学研究,2013,31(02):286-297. [49]FISHBEIN M, AJZEN I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research[J]. 1977. [50]王燕青,丁钇文,林育任.基于扩展计划行为理论的民航飞行学员安全作风形成机理研究[J].科学技术与工程,2025,25(04):1743-1751. [51]江和原,李景平.意向、外因与行为:基于计划行为理论扩展模型的领导干部“不作为”影响机制探析[J].管理现代化,2024,44(02):147-156. [52]张颖,冀巨海.矿工违章作业演化博弈分析——计划行为理论视角[J].矿业安全与环保,2021,48(01):126-130. [53]AJZEN I. The theory of planned behaviour: Reactions and reflections[J]. Psychology & health, 2011, 26(9): 1113-1127. [54]文强,熊学财.基于轨迹交叉理论的有源医疗器械不良事件致因模型研究[J].中国药物警戒,2011,8(01):34-37. [55]杨守国,姚亚金,庞拾亿,等.基于轨迹交叉理论的煤矿事故分析[J].煤炭工程,2019,51(05):177-180. [56]GLASS G V, SMITH M L. Meta-analysis of research on class size and achievement[J]. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 1979, 1(1): 2-16. [57]RAUDENBUSH S W. Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings[J]. 1991. [58]毛良斌,郑全全.元分析的特点、方法及其应用的现状分析[J].应用心理学,2005,(04):354-359. [59]闫岩.计划行为理论的产生、发展和评述[J].国际新闻界,2014,36(07):113-129. [60]李乃文,冀永红,陈香宇.高危岗位员工安全注意力影响机制仿真研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2014,24(03):16-21. [61]李乃文,马跃,牛莉霞.基于计划行为理论的矿工故意违章行为意向研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2011,21(10):3-9. [62]杨佳丽,栗继祖,冯国瑞,等.ABC分析法在煤矿意向性不安全行为管理中的应用[J].中国安全科学学报,2016,26(05):140-145. [63]JIANG Z, FANG D, ZHANG M. Understanding the causation of construction workers’ unsafe behaviors based on system dynamics modeling[J]. Journal of Management in Engineering, 2015, 31(6): 04014099. [64]唐玲玲,张云波,祁神军,等.正式群体安全氛围对建筑工人从众性不安全行为的影响[J].华侨大学学报(自然科学版),2020,41(01):26-31. [65]叶贵,段帅亮,汪红霞.建筑工人不安全行为致因研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(02):170-177. [66]JIANG Z, FANG D, ZHANG M. Understanding the causation of construction workers’ unsafe behaviors based on system dynamics modeling[J]. Journal of Management in Engineering, 2015, 31(6): 04014099. [67]YE G, XIANG Q, YANG L, et al. Safety stressors and construction workers' safety performance: The mediating role of ego depletion and self-efficacy[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2022, 12: 818955. [68]FOGARTY G J, SHAW A. Safety climate and the theory of planned behavior: Towards the prediction of unsafe behavior[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2010, 42(5): 1455-1459. [69]PAUL P S, MAITI J. The synergic role of sociotechnical and personal characteristics on work injuries in mines[J]. Ergonomics, 2008, 51(5): 737-767. [70]ALIABADI M M, AGHAEI H, KALATPOUR O, et al. Effects of human and organizational deficiencies on workers’ safety behavior at a mining site in Iran[J]. Epidemiology and health, 2018, 40. [71]FU W, LUO Z, WANG J, et al. Structural equation model of the influence of noise annoyance on miners’ unsafe behavior in coal mines[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2023, 82: 104978. [72]CHENG L, GUO H, LIN H. The influence of leadership behavior on miners’ work safety behavior[J]. Safety science, 2020, 132: 104986. [73]QIN K, JIA Z, LU T, et al. The role of work engagement in the association between psychological capital and safety citizenship behavior in coal miners: A mediation analysis[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021, 18(17): 9303. [74]SHI G, TAN H, LI H, et al. Influences of cognitive structure variables on miners’ unsafe behavior intentions[J]. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2021, 2021(1): 5556396. [75]NIU L, ZHAO R. The effect of safety attitudes on coal miners’ human errors: A moderated mediation model[J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14(16): 9917. [76]田水承,刘乔,陈洋,等.矿工个体特征因素对煤矿险兆事件影响的SEM研究[J].煤炭工程,2020,52(03):168-171. [77]CHEN T, HU W, LI H. The effect of empowering leadership on miners’ unsafe behavior: a cross-level chain mediation model[J]. International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics, 2023, 29(4): 1345-1357. [78]CHEN T, HU W, LIU J, et al. Effect of work values on miners’ safety behavior: The mediating role of psychological empowerment and the moderating role of safety climate[J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14(15): 9553. [79]LI H, ZHANG Y, YANG W. Safety Stressors and Coal Miners’ Safety Performance: The Mediating Role of Resilience and Coping Styles[J]. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 2024: 79-99. [80]WANG L, CHAI W, SUN N, et al. Unlocking the mechanism of work environment on miners’ unsafe behaviors: A meta-analysis and system dynamics[J]. Resources Policy, 2024, 96: 105217. [81]LI Y, PEI J, WANG S, et al. Analyzing the Unsafe Behaviors of Frontline Construction Workers Based on Structural Equation Modeling[J]. Buildings, 2024, 14(1): 209. [82]DU J, MA J. Study on the Influence of Safety Culture Level on The Unsafe Behavior of Coal Miners[J]. Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management, 2024, 13(2): 163-167. [83]XIN Z, HAI S, NI Y, et al. Work drains them, family heals them: How and when interpersonal conflicts at work drive unsafe behavior in the high-risk industry?[J]. Safety Science, 2024, 178: 106629. [84]张力,魏振宽.煤矿事故的人因失误原因及控制[J].中国煤炭,2004,(07):52-53. [85]赵文金.关于煤矿企业员工岗位胜任力的研究[J].能源技术与管理,2018,43(02):173-175. [86]张钎,栗继祖,申敏.情绪对矿工安全行为能力影响研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2024,34(06):39-47. [87]李广利,温情,苏锴轩,等.矿工不安全情绪对其风险偏好的影响研究[J].安全与环境学报,2024,24(08):3154-3164. [88]赵大龙,田水承,王璟,等.矿工大五人格特质对煤矿险兆事件上报的影响[J].西安科技大学学报,2018,38(03):360-366. [89]LI N, BAO S, NASEEM S, et al. Extending the association between leader-member exchange differentiation and safety performance: a moderated mediation model[J]. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 2021: 1603-1613. [90]陈伟珂,陈瑞瑞.施工现场工人不良职业心理与不安全行为机理研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(04):118-123. [91]陈梅,祁神军,牛达钰,等.主观社会支持对建筑工人心理及不安全行为的影响[J].中国安全科学学报,2021,31(01):30-37. [92]SIU O, PHILLIPS D R, LEUNG T. Safety climate and safety performance among construction workers in Hong Kong: The role of psychological strains as mediators[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2004, 36(3): 359-366. [93]GULDENMUND F W. The nature of safety culture: a review of theory and research[J]. Safety science, 2000, 34(1-3): 215-257. [94]陈彦霖,黄文炜,李弘扬.建筑企业差错管理氛围与工人安全绩效关系[J].中国安全科学学报,2022,32(05):28-34. [95]HAN Y, LI J, CAO X, et al. Structural equation modeling approach to studying the relationships among safety investment, construction employees safety cognition, and behavioral performance[J]. Journal of construction engineering and management, 2020, 146(7): 04020065. [96]成家磊,祁神军,张云波.组织氛围对建筑工人不安全行为的影响机理及实证研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(11):11-16. [97]LI Y, GAO J, QIAN C, et al. The mediation role of safety attitude in the impact of resilience on the safety behavior of coal miners in China[J]. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022, 19(22): 15164. [98]韩文民,黄劲松,吴俊,等.基于近红外光学脑成像实验的轻型装配作业的中断效应研究[J].工业工程,2019,22(03):57-64. [99]余琦玮,唐为昊,耿洁.面向复杂装配任务的脑力负荷综合评估方法[J].工业工程,2024,27(02):67-73+97. [100]WEISS H M, CROPANZANO R. Affective events theory[J]. Research in organizational behavior, 1996, 18(1): 1-74. [101]TONG R, WANG X, WANG L, et al. A dual perspective on work stress and its effect on unsafe behaviors: The mediating role of fatigue and the moderating role of safety climate[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2022, 165: 929-940. [102]王连聪,梁运涛,罗海珠.我国矿井热动力灾害理论研究进展与展望[J].煤炭科学技术,2018,46(07):1-9. [103]熊玮,余双,陈碧珍.某铁矿噪声环境作业对井下采矿工听力的影响[J].江苏预防医学,2018,29(04):449-450. [104]顾清华,何鑫鑫,王倩,等.基于改进YOLOv5的煤矿井下暗环境矿工安全穿戴智能识别[J].矿业研究与开发,2024,44(03):201-208. [105]王建国,盖金梦,王经伟.高温高湿环境下风速对矿工安全工作极限时间的影响[J].煤矿安全,2022,53(04):253-256. [106]张江石,吴悠,郭金山,等.煤矿环境对矿工个体行为的影响机制研究[J].安全与环境学报,2021,21(02):649-655. [107]COOPER M D. Exploratory analyses of the effects of managerial support and feedback consequences on behavioral safety maintenance[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 2006, 26(3): 1-41. [108]田水承,李广利,李停军,等.基于SD的矿工不安全行为干预模型仿真[J].煤矿安全,2014,45(08):245-248. [109]佟瑞鹏,陈策,刘大鹏.矿工不安全行为组织干预时效性研究[J].矿业科学学报,2016,1(02):155-161. [110]李琰,李芳,李红霞.矿工社会网络结构对煤炭企业安全文化影响分析[J].煤矿安全,2014,45(05):224-227. [111]林新奇,刘彦君.领导行为风格对新生代员工创新行为的影响研究—基于组织认同中介作用的分析[J].中国物价,2021,(05):92-94+109. [112]陈宝智,吴敏.事故致因理论与安全理念[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2008,(01):42-46. [113]XIA N, XIE Q, HU X, et al. A dual perspective on risk perception and its effect on safety behavior: A moderated mediation model of safety motivation, and supervisor’s and coworkers’ safety climate[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2020, 134: 105350. [114]NEAL A, GRIFFIN M A, HART P M. The impact of organizational climate on safety climate and individual behavior[J]. Safety science, 2000, 34(1-3): 99-109. [115]JU D, QIN X, XU M, et al. Boundary conditions of the emotional exhaustion-unsafe behavior link: The dark side of group norms and personal control[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2016, 33: 113-140. [116]祁神军,姚明亮,成家磊,等.安全激励对具从众动机的建筑工人不安全行为的干预作用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2018,14(12):186-192. [117]NAHRGANG J D, MORGESON F P, HOFMANN D A. Safety at work: a meta-analytic investigation of the link between job demands, job resources, burnout, engagement, and safety outcomes[J]. Journal of applied psychology, 2011, 96(1): 71. [118]康梦月,祁神军,张云波,等.精神支持对建筑工人消极情绪的干预机制[J].中国安全科学学报,2023,33(01):56-63. [119]王燕青,丁钇文,林育任.基于扩展计划行为理论的民航飞行学员安全作风形成机理研究[J].科学技术与工程,2025,25(04):1743-1751. [120]CRISTEA M, GHEORGHIU A. Attitude, perceived behavioral control, and intention to adopt risky behaviors[J]. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 2016, 43: 157-165. [121]KIM B J, JI W K, JEON S G. A Mediating Effect of Job Stress Between Physical Environmental Risk and Safety Behavior, and Moderating Effect of Perceived Control[J]. Journal of the Korean Society of Safety, 2017, 32(2): 105-111. [122]ATASOY O, MOREWEDGE C K. Digital goods are valued less than physical goods[J]. Journal of consumer research, 2018, 44(6): 1343-1357. [123]祁慧,章大林,张静,等.制度信任对矿工自主安全行为意愿的影响分析[J].中国矿业,2016,25(10):14-17. [124]马小平,金珠.蚁群聚类算法在煤矿安全评价人因事故分析中的应用[J].煤炭学报,2009,34(05):678-682. [125]MAITI J, BHATTACHERJEE A. Evaluation of risk of occupational injuries among underground coal mine workers through multinomial logit analysis[J]. Journal of Safety Research, 1999, 30(2): 93-101. [126]郝建营.煤矿井下人员不安全行为测度模型与应用研究[J].山东煤炭科技,2024,42(10):175-178+184. [127]姚明亮,祁神军,成家磊,等.工作负荷与建筑工人不安全行为的结构关系研究[J].建筑经济,2019,40(01):30-35. [128]PALMER JONES R, JACKSON C. Work intensity, gender and sustainable development[J]. Food Policy, 1997, 22(1): 39-62. [129]USECHE S A, MONTORO L, ALONSO F, et al. Does gender really matter? A structural equation model to explain risky and positive cycling behaviors[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2018, 118: 86-95. [130]苑红伟,肖贵平.基于交通心理的行人不安全行为研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2008,(01):20-26+179. [131]BYRNES J P, MILLER D C, SCHAFER W D. Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis[J]. Psychological bulletin, 1999, 125(3): 367. [132]陈雪锋,陈文涛.建筑工人安全态度及其影响因素研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2017,27(04):31-36. [133]GRIFFETH R W, HOM P W, GAERTNER S. A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: Update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium[J]. Journal of management, 2000, 26(3): 463-488. [134]王永贵,张言彩.元分析方法在国内外经济管理研究中的应用比较[J].经济管理,2012,34(04):182-190. [135]HEDGES L V. Meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1992, 17(4): 279-296. [136]王琦玮,梅强,刘素霞,等.基于员工安全行为视角的企业安全生产影响元分析[J].管理评论,2020,32(03):226-237. [137]COHEN J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences [M]. Routledge, 2013.
﹀
|
中图分类号: |
TD79
|
开放日期: |
2025-06-17
|